Abstract

BackgroundA proper reduction and internal fixation of posterior malleolar fractures can be challenging, as intraoperative fluoroscopy often underestimates the extent of the fracture. Our aim was to assess the value of a modified classification system for posterior malleolar fractures, which is based on computed tomography (CT) images, optimizing screw trajectory during fluoroscopic-guided surgery, and to compare it to the Lauge-Hansen classification system to the CT-based classification.MethodsA retrospective review of all ankle fracture operations from January 2014 to December 2016 was performed. Fractures were included if a CT scan was performed within 1 week of the surgery, and the posterior malleolar fragment occupied one third or more of the antero-posterior talar surface or jeopardize the ankle stability. Eighty-five adult ankle fractures with posterior malleolar fragments were included in this study. Fractures were categorized into one of three types, namely “postero-lateral,” “postero-medial,” or “postero-central,” according to the location of the fracture fragment on axial CT image. An optimal trajectory angle for a single-lag screw fixation was measured on the CT cut between a central antero-posterior line and the line intersecting the posterior fragment perpendicular to the major fracture line. Mean trajectory angles were calculated for each fracture type. Fractures were also categorized according to the Lauge-Hansen system.ResultsThe mean trajectory angle was 21° lateral for “postero-lateral” fragments, 7° lateral for “postero-central” fragments, and 28° medial for “postero-medial” fragments (p < 0.01 for comparisons among the groups). The range of trajectory angles within each group was about 10°, as compared to about 20° within each Lauge-Hansen type. There were no differences in trajectory angle among the Lauge-Hansen groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).ConclusionsThere are 3 distinct anatomic subgroups of posterior malleolar fragments, each with an ideal screw trajectory that needs to be used in order to achieve an optimal reduction and fixation.

Highlights

  • A proper reduction and internal fixation of posterior malleolar fractures can be challenging, as intraoperative fluoroscopy often underestimates the extent of the fracture

  • Seven to 12% of all ankle fractures can be classified as trimalleolar fractures, which involve the posterior malleolus in addition to the medial and lateral malleoli [3, 4]

  • While medial and lateral malleolar fractures can be reduced anatomically during surgery, intraoperative fluoroscopic anterior posterior (AP), lateral, and mortise views generally underestimate the extent of the posterior malleolar fractures [12, 14]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A proper reduction and internal fixation of posterior malleolar fractures can be challenging, as intraoperative fluoroscopy often underestimates the extent of the fracture. Seven to 12% of all ankle fractures can be classified as trimalleolar fractures, which involve the posterior malleolus in addition to the medial and lateral malleoli [3, 4]. Other authors support surgical intervention only when the fragment involves more than 50% of the articular surface [11] Another common indication for surgery is a posterior malleolar fracture in combination with lateral malleolar fractures [12]. While medial and lateral malleolar fractures can be reduced anatomically during surgery, intraoperative fluoroscopic anterior posterior (AP), lateral, and mortise views generally underestimate the extent of the posterior malleolar fractures [12, 14]. Some surgeons may employ early postoperative CT to assess the accuracy of their reduction

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.