Preoperative Cutaneous Conditions and Postoperative Skin Injuries in Patients Undergoing Surgery in the Lateral Decubitus Position: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BackgroundSkin barrier functions develop after birth and may be related to skin disorders in infants. We aimed to assess associations between dynamic trends of four skin barrier functional parameters in early life with infant atopic dermatitis (AD).MethodsBased on the prospective cohort MKNFOAD (NCT02889081), we examined transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum hydration (SCH), skin pH, and sebum content at five anatomical sites (cheek, forehead, forearm, abdomen, and lower leg) in 418 term infants at birth, 42 days, and 6 months. Trend differences by sex and association with AD at age 1 year were tested using variance analyses. Associations of the parameters with AD risk were tested using discrete time survival analysis, adjusting extensive covariates including parental history of allergy, infant’s sex, birth weight (kg), and delivery mode. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CIs) were reported.ResultsOverall TEWL and SCH appeared trends of increase while skin surface pH and sebum content showed trends of decrease within the first six postnatal months. Sex differences were significant for sebum content only (p < 0.001). After adjustment for parental and children covariates, cheek TEWL at birth (OR = 1.26, 95% CI 1.00–1.57, p = 0.045) and 42 days (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.17–1.97, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with increased AD risk. Associations were not observed between SCH, skin pH, and sebum content at birth or 42 days with AD.ConclusionsSkin barrier functions of Chinese term infants varied nonlinearly after birth. Higher postnatal TEWL levels in early life indicate higher risk of early‐onset AD.

Skin pH may be influenced by various factors, such as hydration of stratum corneum, rate of sebum excretion rate, transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and sweating in relation to skin ageing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between skin pH and wrinkle formation that is directly related to ageing. In addition, we investigated the factors related to skin ageing by comparing the association between skin pH and other skin properties. Three hundred volunteers were selected from three countries: Korea, Vietnam and Singapore. Hydration on the stratum corneum, the rate of sebum excretion rate, melanin index, TEWL and skin temperature on the cheek were measured in a controlled room, and wrinkle length and depth using replicas were compared with skin pH variation. The mean and standard deviation of skin surface pH among the three countries were 5.510 ± 0.625. The greatest gap of skin pH that revealed significant differences for skin properties was represented between the Koreans and the Vietnamese. For all three countries, skin hydration, melanin contents, wrinkle length, wrinkle depth and skin temperature were significantly correlated with skin pH. Factors related to skin moisturizing, such as skin hydration, sebum excretion rate and skin temperature, were negatively correlated with skin pH. Wrinkle length and depth decreased as skin pH became more acidic. Skin properties displayed various values depending on skin pH. In particular, wrinkle formation significantly decreased as skin pH becomes more acidic. We conclude that skin pH is determined by skin properties, such as skin hydration, sebum excretion rate, melanin concentration, TEWL and skin temperature that affects wrinkle formation.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by impaired epidermal barrier function. Portable devices are available to measure stratum corneum hydration (SCH) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL). These could be incorporated into clinical practice to measure barrier function to define treatment success in AD. Despite the importance, there is minimal evidence for objective biophysical measurements to assess treatment success. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of SCH and TEWL in distinguishing treatment efficacy between methotrexate and topical treatments and their correlation with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). Patients with AD (n = 16) were recruited from a specialist eczema clinic, as well as healthy controls (n = 10). All cases were recruited when the current therapy switch was planned, namely at the point of treatment failure. Of the patients with AD, 56% (9 of 16) had not responded to topical therapy, and 44% (7 of 16) had not responded to methotrexate. EASI scores did not differ significantly between the groups with lack of response to topical treatment or methotrexate (mean 20.7, SD 10.9 vs. mean 18.2, SD 15.1, respectively; P = 0.70). Furthermore, DLQI and POEM scores did not significantly differ between topical or methotrexate treatment (P = 0.24 and P = 0.89, respectively). As expected, healthy control samples showed significantly better barrier function than both lesional (TEWL, P &amp;lt; 0.001; SCH, P = 0.002) and nonlesional skin (TEWL, P = 0.004; SCH, P = 0.02). EASI positively correlated with TEWL values in both lesional and nonlesional skin (r &amp;gt; 0.5, P &amp;lt; 0.05). However, SCH did not correlate well with EASI for lesional and nonlesional skin (r = 0.075 and 0.029, respectively). Interestingly, with topical treatment, lesions could be distinguished from nonlesions by both TEWL (P = 0.008) and SCH (P = 0.003), even in treatment failures. However, with methotrexate treatment, barrier function measures were equivalent between lesions and nonlesions for TEWL (P = 0.44) and SCH (P = 0.55). Skin barrier function correlated very weakly with patient-reported outcomes for both TEWL and SCH, with POEM (lesional r2 = 0.15 and 0.04, respectively; nonlesional r2 ≤ 0.005 and r2 = 0.04) and DLQI (lesional r2 = 0.11 and 0.22; nonlesional r2 = 0.06 and 0.21). In conclusion, barrier function, as defined by TEWL and SCH, was significantly impaired in AD compared with healthy controls, but only TEWL scores correlated with EASI. In the patients, SCH did significantly distinguish lesions from nonlesions, as did TEWL. However, unlike topical-treated cases, in those with methotrexate treatment, no difference was shown between lesional and nonlesional TEWL and SCH. These data suggest that systemic therapy with methotrexate may improve lesional skin barrier function to that of nonlesional skin, even in those who are deemed to have not responded to treatment. Therefore, additional measures may be required to automate the definition of therapeutic treatment success or failure.

Evaluation of skin barrier function based on skin dermoscopic features in patients with rosacea.

Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and surface capacitance measure skin barrier permeability and stratum corneum (SC) hydration, respectively, and are frequently utilized in atopic dermatitis clinical trials. Many barrier devices are costly and often used only in the academic setting. GPSkin is a low-cost, patient-operated device that measures both TEWL and SC hydration. This study aimed to test the reliability of GPSkin and assess its correlation with current industry standards. GPSkin was compared to the Biox AquaFlux (TEWL) and Courage-Khazaka Corneometer (SC hydration). Participants with healthy skin (n=50) collected measurements with GPSkin in Trial 1 without any device education and in Trial 2 with additional instruction. In Trial 2, the investigator also performed measurements with GPSkin. Spearman's coefficients (rs ) were performed to assess device correlation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine reliability. Overall, GPSkin was moderately correlated with current industry device measurements for TEWL (Trial 1 rs :0.48; Trial 2 rs :0.40 participant, 0.34 investigator) and SC hydration (Trial 1 rs :0.63; Trial 2 rs :0.45). GPSkin demonstrated "good" test-retest reliability for both TEWL (ICC: 0.89) and SC hydration (ICC: 0.85) measurements when participants were provided with some device education. There was no difference in reliability between participants provided with device education and investigators. Based on these findings, we concluded that GPSkin provides reasonably precise and reliable measurements of SC hydration and TEWL as compared to current devices.

Introduction: Compared to adults, newborns’ skin has a thinner epidermis and stratum corneum with decreased hydration levels, higher transepidermal water loss, and a pH variation between 5.5 and 7.5. These characteristics can predispose to the occurrence of dryness, infections, and dermatological conditions. Water and liquid soap with adequate formulation have shown to be beneficial and safe for newborns’ skin. However, studies evaluating the effect of bar soap, products widely used in Brazil and Latin America, are unknown. Therefore, the objective of this study was to compare the effects of liquid and bar soaps on the term newborns’ skin. Methods: This randomized controlled, parallel, single-blind clinical trial was conducted at a public university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. 100 healthy term newborns with no congenital anomalies, acute diseases, or dermatological conditions were randomized to use liquid soap (experimental group) or bar soap (control group). Skin pH, transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration, sebum content, and skin condition were assessed before and after the first bath, at 48 h, 14 days, and 28 days after birth. These evaluations were performed on the forearm, abdomen, buttocks, and thigh. In addition, the mother’s perception of soap use was also evaluated. Results: Data of 100 newborns were analyzed by intention to treat. The rate of retention was 53%. Newborns exposed to the liquid soap presented significantly better skin acidification (p < 0.001) and significantly better stratum corneum hydration (p < 0.001) than the skin of newborns exposed to the bar soap, regardless of the area evaluated. There were no significant differences in transepidermal water loss, sebum content, dryness, erythema, or skin breakdown and the mother’s perceptions of the use of the soaps. Conclusion: Newborns in the experimental group presented better skin acidification and stratum corneum hydration when compared to newborns in the control group.

Measurements of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum (SC) hydration are important for assessing epidermal functions. However, the availability of reliable and user-friendly devices, which can simultaneously measure both TEWL and SC hydration and can allow health providers to remotely access data in time, is limited. GPSkin Barrier® was compared with MPA5 system in the measurements of TEWL and SC hydration on the cheek, the dorsal hand, and the forearm in 200 normal volunteers, including 126 females and 74 males, aged 1-78years with an average age of 45.24±1.04years. Correlation of data measured with MPA5 system and GPSkin Barrier® was determined. Levels of both TEWL and SC hydration measured with the Barrie GPSkin Barrier® were lower than that with MPA5 system on all 3 body sites except for hydration on the cheek. The levels of both TEWL and SC hydration measured with GpSkin Barrier® were correlated well with that measured with MPA5 system on all 3 body sites CONCLUSIONS: GPSkin Barrier® is a reliable, affordable, and versatile device for assessing epidermal permeability barrier function and SC hydration.

We aimed to evaluate the trajectory of skin barrier properties in full-term newborns during the first four days after birth. Based on the MKNFOAD cohort (NCT02889081), transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum hydration (SCH), skin pH, and sebum content at five anatomical sites (cheek, forehead, volar forearm, abdomen, and dorsal lower leg) were examined once within 96 h after birth in 384 full-term infants. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess variations in these skin barrier parameters with age adjusted for gestational age, neonate's sex, parents' allergy history, delivery mode, amniotic fluid characteristics, and birth weight. The regression coefficient (ß) and 95% confidence interval were reported. We analyzed a total of 384 neonates including 198 (51.6%) boys. TEWL values remained stable and showed no significant association with age (days). pH values exhibited a declining trend with age (p for trend <0.001). Both SCH values and sebum content grew with age (p for trend <0.001). During the first four days after birth, the skin TEWL remained stable, pH decreased, and the SCH and sebum content increased over time. These findings provide insights into the neonatal skin physiological development at the beginning of life. From birth to 96 h, TEWL was stable, pH showed a steep decline, SCH and sebum content increased. This study provides the first evidence of skin adaptation in the newborn due to changes in utero to after birth in the first 4 days of life in an Asian population. These findings will provide a new theoretical basis for neonatal skin physiology and clinical strategies for guiding newborn skin care.

Transepidermal water-loss (TEWL), stratum-corneum hydration (SCH), erythema, elasticity, pH and melanin, are parameters of the epidermal barrier function and skin homeostasis that objectively indicate the integrity of the skin barrier. Sunscreens are necessary to protect people from skin cancer, but could modify the skin barrier function. Nevertheless, there are not many studies on their impact on skin homeostasis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of sunscreens on the epidermal-barrier function and skin homeostasis of healthy individuals. A prospective observational study was designed. TEWL, SCH, erythema, elasticity, pH and melanin were measured on the cheek and volar region of the forearm, using non-invasive methods before and after applying sunscreen. Four different sunscreens were tested, one full-body sunscreen and three facial sunscreens. The study included 51 healthy volunteers, 72.5% (37/51) women, with a mean age of 41.63 years. After full-body sunscreen application, temperature increased by 0.68 °C (p < 0.001), pH by 0.16 units (p < 0.001), and elasticity by 0.22% (p = 0.039), while melanin decreased by 10.95 AU (p < 0.001), erythema by 28.79 AU (p < 0.001) and TEWL by 0.66 g·m−2·h−1 (p = 0.019). On the cheek, facial sunscreen 1 increased temperature by 0.51 °C, TEWL 0.7 g·m−2·h−1 (p < 0.05), pH by 0.12 units (p < 0.001) and elasticity by 0.059% (p < 0.001), but decreased erythema by 19.87 AU (p < 0.05) and SCH by 5.63 AU (p < 0.001). Facial sunscreen 2 increased temperature by 0.67 °C, TEWL by 1.93 g·m−2·h−1 (p < 0.001), pH by 0.42 units (p < 0.001) and elasticity by 0.12% (p < 0.01), but decreased melanin by 15.2 AU (p = 0.000), erythema by 38.61 AU (p < 0.05) and SCH by 10.80 AU (p < 0.01). Facial sunscreen 3 increased temperature by 1.15 °C, TEWL by 2.29 g·m−2·h−1 (p < 0.001), pH by 0.46 units (p < 0.001) and elasticity by 0.15% (p < 0.01), but decreased erythema by 35.7 (p < 0.05) and SCH by 10.80 AU (p < 0.01). In conclusion, sunscreen could slightly modify the skin-barrier function. All of them decreased erythema, likely in relation to anti-inflammatory power.

BackgroundSkin measurements of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum hydration (SCH) reflect different aspects of skin physiology. Since epidermal water loss depends on epidermal‐to‐air water vapor gradients, a possible quantitative relationship between TEWL and SCH may exist. This investigation's purpose was to test the possible TEWL‐SCH relationship.Materials and MethodsSCH and TEWL were measured noninvasively on forearm and palmer thenar eminence (hand) in 40 young adults (20 males) along with total body fat percentage (FAT) via bioimpedance.ResultsA significant positive nonlinear correlation (p < 0.001) was detected between SCH and TEWL in hands of the male cohort that occurred when SCH exceeded a threshold level. This threshold level was not exceeded in male or female forearms and forearms did not display a SCH‐TEWL correlation. There was a weak inverse dependence of TEWL on FAT on both forearm and hand (p < 0.05), but no SCH‐FAT relationship was observed. TEWL values on the forearm and hand were moderately correlated with each other (p = 0.002) but SCH values were not.ConclusionThe findings clarify the relationship between forearm and palmer hydration and TEWL values, and their relationship to total body fat percentages in young healthy adults. The significant correlation between palmer stratum corneum hydration and palmer TEWL that was discovered in the male but not the female cohort suggests a threshold hydration level for which TEWL depends both on skin barrier function and stratum corneum hydration. This implies that conditions with increased SCH may in part account for elevated TEWL values.

BackgroundThe preterm infants' skin is structurally and functionally immature at birth because of immature stratum corneum barrier function, leading to problems with fluid loses, thermoregulation, and infection. Two parameters of barrier function can be non-invasively assessed: Stratum Corneum Hydration (SCH) and Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL). Skin-to-Skin Care (SSC) is the proposed independent variable that might affect barrier function by decreasing TEWL and increasing SCH, thereby improving stratum corneum barrier function and consequently decreasing the rate of infection. No study of SSC's effects on TEWL and SCH of preterm infants could be found. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of 5 daily Skin-to-Skin Contact sessions on infant skin hydration (SCH), transepidermal evaporated water loss (TEWL), and on SCH when TEWL was controlled, and on the presence of hospital acquired infection.MethodsA one-group pretest-test-posttest design with 10 preterm infants (28 - 30 wks GA < 32 wks postmenstrual age, and no infection at entry). Test = 90 minutes of SSC; pre-test and post-test = 30 minutes each of prone positioning in an incubator. SCH and TEWL were taken on Days 1 and 5 at the beginning, middle and end of each period using Multi-Probe Adaptor. A 3 X 3 X 2 Repeated Measures Mixed Models Design, including a covariate, was used to analyze level of Skin Hydration. Specifically, the model tested comparisons in SCH made across repetitions, time, and days, as well as all possible interactions while controlling for TEWL. Descriptive statistics described the number of positive blood cultures during hospitalization and the presence of infections four weeks post-discharge.ResultsSignificant differences in skin hydration were found across TIME (Pre-SSC, SSC, Post-SSC) (F = 21.86; p < 0.001). One infant had a positive blood culture during hospitalization; no infants had signs of infection by 4 weeks post-discharge. ConclusionsThe study has begun fulfilling the recommendation that SSC be tested as a strategy to improve skin hydration, but reveals that evaporative loss may be higher during SSC than during incubator care, and that the higher transepidermal evaporated water loss values may not necessarily be detrimental because few infections occurred even in its presence. A definitive randomized controlled trial is recommended.KeywordsSkin-to-skin contact; Skin hydration; Transepidermal water loss; Infection; Preterm

Transepidermal water loss (TEWL), stratum corneum hydration (SCH), and skin surface pH are indicators of skin barrier integrity. There is scant evidence on normative data for cutaneous homeostasis parameters in healthy individuals. To develop normative data for skin erythema, melanin, pH, SCH, and TEWL; identify differences in these variables among different anatomical locations; and explore factors that may modify these values. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 87 healthy volunteers (34 males) aged 20 to 40 years. TEWL, SCH, pH, erythema, and melanin were measured on the cheeks, volar forearms, and palms. The lowest TEWL value corresponded to volar forearms (9.69 ± 2.94 g m-2·h-1) and the highest to palms (49.32 ± 14.55 g m-2·h-1). Erythema was more evident on cheeks than palms or volar forearms (413.51 arbitruary units [AU] vs. 259.98 AU vs. 252.02 AU). The lowest melanin index was documented for palms (92.72 ± 41.70 AU). pH levels were similar among the different locations. The erythema index was significantly higher in males versus females for all locations. Linear regression analysis adjusted for age and SCH revealed an increase in 0.45 ± 0.18 g m-2·h-1 for TEWL on the cheek and 0.32 ± 0.10 g m-2·h-1 for TEWL on the forearm for each one-year increase in age. We provide normative data for individuals aged 20-40 years, across three anatomical locations, and propose a predictive model for TEWL on the cheek and forearm as a function of age and SCH.

Prevention of recurrent pressure ulcers (PU) is one of the most important challenges in wound care, furthermore, the risk factors for recurrent PUs are still not fully understood. This study aimed to explore the risk factors for recurrent PU development within two weeks, including biophysical skin properties, pro-inflammatory cytokine (tumour necrosis factor [TNF]-α) levels and bacterial species, in older patients. This prospective study was conducted in a long-term care facility with patients whose PU had healed within two months. Biophysical skin properties were evaluated by stratum corneum hydration, pH, sebum content and transepidermal water loss. TNF-α level was measured using skin blotting. Skin bacteria were collected using tape stripping and determined by species-specific gene amplification. These parameters, along with Braden scale and interface pressure, were evaluated every two weeks for a total period of eight weeks. A penalised generalised estimating equation analysis was used to determine the risk factors for recurrent PUs. In total, 20 patients were included in this study, with 57 observations. Of these, recurrent PU was seen in eight observations. Elevation of pH (p=0.049; odds ratio [OR] per 1 unit=3.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.01-15.15), presence of Acinetobacter spp. (p=0.039; OR versus culture-negative=6.28, 95%CI:1.10-35.86) and higher interface pressure (p=0.008; OR per 1 mmHg=1.06, 95%CI:1.01-1.10) on the healed PU were significantly related to the development of recurrent PU. Higher pH, existence of Acinetobacter spp. and higher interface pressure on the site of the healed PU were associated with the development of recurrent PUs in older patients undergoing conservative treatments.

BackgroundGentle cleansing of the skin without further compromising its barrier function and moisture content and being simultaneously devoid of adverse effects on the skin microbiome are important features of body cleansers for atopic‐prone skin sufferers. For this population, a new dexpanthenol‐containing liquid cleanser (DCLC) was developed.MethodsTwo prospective 4‐week studies have been conducted. Study 1 investigated the effect of once‐daily DCLC on stratum corneum (SC) hydration, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), skin pH, and skin microbiome (all on the volar forearm) in adult subjects with dry skin (N = 44). Study 2 explored the cutaneous tolerability of DCLC and its effect on the microbiome biodiversity of the volar forearm skin in infants/children with atopic‐prone skin (N = 33, aged 6 months to 6 years). In the latter study, DCLC was applied 2–3 days/week in combination with an emollient applied at least twice daily.ResultsIn Study 1, on Day 29, the mean change in skin surface capacitance from baseline was significantly greater in the forearm test area treated with DCLC than in the contralateral test area (control) treated with water only (5.16 vs. 3.65 a.u.; p = 0.011), suggesting long‐term SC hydration. DCLC use was not associated with changes in TEWL, skin pH, or microbiome biodiversity if compared to control. In Study 2, the 4‐week use of DCLC in combination with an emollient was well tolerated according to pediatrician skin assessment, and no flare‐ups were recorded. The microbiome biodiversity did not shift during the study.ConclusionThese findings support the use of DCLC in subjects with atopic‐prone skin.

Introduction: Three interrelated skin water assessments include stratum corneum hydration (SCH) via electrical measurements, skin water using tissue dielectric constant (TDC) measurements, and transepidermal water loss (TEWL). These are differentially used for skin physiology research, clinical assessments of dermatological conditions and to assess skin water in diabetes and lymphedema. Often volar forearm skin is used for assessments done at various times of day (TOD). The present goal was to assess the extent of intraday variability in SCH, TDC, and TEWL. Methods: Twelve medical students self-measured SCH, TDC, and TEWL on their forearm every 2 h from 08:00 to 24:00 h on 2 consecutive days. All participants were well trained and pre-certified in all procedures. Tests for parameter differences among TOD were via the nonparametric Friedman test. Results: No significant differences in SCH or TEWL were found among TOD over the 16-h interval for either day or combined. Contrastingly, TDC decreased slightly but significantly from morning through evening. There was no evidence of a diurnal pattern. Interestingly, a significant nonlinear relationship between TEWL and SCH was detected. Conclusion: Findings indicate only minor intraday variations with TOD trend except for TDC which decreases slightly from morning through evening. The clinical relevance relates to the confidence now gained associated with the parameter estimates when measured at different TOD during normal clinic hours or beyond. This should help in estimating the potential importance of small differences if measured at a different TOD. From a physiological viewpoint, the findings uncover and describe an interesting nonlinear relationship between TEWL and SCH which may serve to propel further investigations that might better characterize this process.