Preliminary Psychometric Review of Neurologists' Speech Ratings on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.
The purpose of this study was to conduct a preliminary psychometric evaluation of the speech item of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III. Twenty neurologists specializing in movement disorders evaluated the speech-unscripted and sentence reading-of people with Parkinson's disease (PD) on the MDS-UPDRS Part III. The concurrent validity of the speech item was evaluated by comparing the ratings to a previously collected estimate of the speakers' intelligibility during sentence reading. The reproducibility of the ratings was evaluated in terms of reliability (intra- and interrater) and agreement. MDS-UPDRS Part III speech ratings based on sentence reading were moderately and negatively correlated with previously collected estimates of intelligibility. No such relationship was found for MDS-UPDRS Part III speech ratings based on unscripted speech. Individual correlations for each rater ranged widely, with some showing weak, negligible, or positive relationships with intelligibility. Intrarater reliability was high, but interrater reliability was fair for both speech tasks. Movement disorders specialists agreed on MDS-UPDRS speech ratings, on average, less than 70% of the time. A critical communication outcome-intelligibility during unscripted speech-is not captured by MDS-UPDRS Part III speech ratings, suggesting weak concurrent validity of this widely used metric of speech function. The reproducibility of MDS-UPDRS Part III speech ratings across providers is fair. These speech ratings may be insufficient to assess the speech function of people with PD and identify those in need of speech services.
- # Movement Disorder Society-sponsored Revision Of The Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
- # Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale
- # Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating
- # Speech Ratings
- # Parkinson's Disease Rating
- # Unified Parkinson's Disease
- # Disease Rating Scale
- # Sentence Reading
- # Parkinson's Disease
- # Unscripted Speech
- Research Article
6234
- 10.1002/mds.22340
- Nov 15, 2008
- Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society
We present a clinimetric assessment of the Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). The MDS-UDPRS Task Force revised and expanded the UPDRS using recommendations from a published critique. The MDS-UPDRS has four parts, namely, I: Non-motor Experiences of Daily Living; II: Motor Experiences of Daily Living; III: Motor Examination; IV: Motor Complications. Twenty questions are completed by the patient/caregiver. Item-specific instructions and an appendix of complementary additional scales are provided. Movement disorder specialists and study coordinators administered the UPDRS (55 items) and MDS-UPDRS (65 items) to 877 English speaking (78% non-Latino Caucasian) patients with Parkinson's disease from 39 sites. We compared the two scales using correlative techniques and factor analysis. The MDS-UPDRS showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79-0.93 across parts) and correlated with the original UPDRS (rho = 0.96). MDS-UPDRS across-part correlations ranged from 0.22 to 0.66. Reliable factor structures for each part were obtained (comparative fit index > 0.90 for each part), which support the use of sum scores for each part in preference to a total score of all parts. The combined clinimetric results of this study support the validity of the MDS-UPDRS for rating PD.
- Research Article
1
- 10.1002/mds.70096
- Oct 27, 2025
- Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society
Predicting initiation of dopaminergic therapy in early Parkinson's disease (PD) is important for clinical management and trial design. Prior cross-sectional work identified a six-item patient-reported subset from the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Parts IB + II, but its longitudinal utility is unknown. To test whether modeling longitudinal symptom trajectories improves prediction of dopaminergic therapy initiation beyond baseline-only models, and to identify an abbreviated patient-reported subset with stable prognostic value and utility for trial stratification. Data were harmonized from 1787 untreated early PD patients across six multicenter studies. All 20 MDS-UPDRS Parts IB + II items were analyzed using a longitudinal item response theory model. Items were ranked by discrimination and information functions, and cumulative subsets evaluated in Cox models with time-dependent covariates, adjusted for age, sex, disease duration, and Hoehn and Yahr stage. Predictive accuracy was quantified by concordance index (C-index) for full follow-up and truncation at 1 and 2 years. Risk stratification was assessed based on baseline abbreviated subset scores using Kaplan-Meier analyses. An 11-item model consistently outperformed the full 20-item scale (C-index 0.609 vs. 0.597, P < 0.001 with full follow-up; 0.621 vs. 0.599, P < 0.001 at 1 year; 0.615 vs. 0.602, P < 0.001 at 2 years). Longitudinal updates improved discrimination over baseline-only models (eg, 0.609 vs. 0.594 for full follow-up). Higher baseline 11-item scores were strongly associated with earlier therapy initiation. Longitudinal symptom modeling improves prediction of therapy initiation in early PD. An abbreviated 11-item patient-reported MDS-UPDRS provides stronger prognostic value than the full scale and supports trial stratification and clinical monitoring. © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
- Research Article
1269
- 10.1002/mds.21198
- Jan 1, 2007
- Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society
This article presents the revision process, major innovations, and clinimetric testing program for the Movement Disorder Society (MDS)-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), known as the MDS-UPDRS. The UPDRS is the most widely used scale for the clinical study of Parkinson's disease (PD). The MDS previously organized a critique of the UPDRS, which cited many strengths, but recommended revision of the scale to accommodate new advances and to resolve problematic areas. An MDS-UPDRS committee prepared the revision using the recommendations of the published critique of the scale. Subcommittees developed new material that was reviewed by the entire committee. A 1-day face-to-face committee meeting was organized to resolve areas of debate and to arrive at a working draft ready for clinimetric testing. The MDS-UPDRS retains the UPDRS structure of four parts with a total summed score, but the parts have been modified to provide a section that integrates nonmotor elements of PD: I, Nonmotor Experiences of Daily Living; II, Motor Experiences of Daily Living; III, Motor Examination; and IV, Motor Complications. All items have five response options with uniform anchors of 0 = normal, 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, and 4 = severe. Several questions in Part I and all of Part II are written as a patient/caregiver questionnaire, so that the total rater time should remain approximately 30 minutes. Detailed instructions for testing and data acquisition accompany the MDS-UPDRS in order to increase uniform usage. Multiple language editions are planned. A three-part clinimetric program will provide testing of reliability, validity, and responsiveness to interventions. Although the MDS-UPDRS will not be published until it has successfully passed clinimetric testing, explanation of the process, key changes, and clinimetric programs allow clinicians and researchers to understand and participate in the revision process.
- Research Article
136
- 10.1007/s10072-012-1112-z
- Jun 8, 2012
- Neurological Sciences
The Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) has been available in English since 2008. As part of this process, the MDS-UPDRS organizing team developed guidelines for development of official non-English translations. We present here the formal process for completing officially approved non-English versions of the MDS-UPDRS and specifically focus on the first of these versions in Italian. The MDS-UPDRS was translated into Italian and tested in 377 native-Italian speaking PD patients. Confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses determined whether the factor structure for the English-language MDS-UPDRS could be confirmed in data collected using the Italian translation. To be designated an 'Official MDS translation,' the Comparative Fit Index (CFI) had to be ≥0.90 relative to the English-language version. For all four parts of the Italian MDS-UPDRS, the CFI, in comparison with the English-language data, was ≥0.94. Exploratory factor analyses revealed some differences between the two datasets, however these differences were considered to be within an acceptable range. The Italian version of the MDS-UPDRS reaches the criterion to be designated as an Official Translation and is now available for use. This protocol will serve as outline for further validation of this in multiple languages.
- Research Article
18
- 10.3988/jcn.2020.16.4.633
- Sep 25, 2020
- Journal of Clinical Neurology (Seoul, Korea)
Background and PurposeThe Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is widely used for estimating the symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Translation and validation of the MDS-UPDRS is necessary for non-English speaking countries and regions. The aim of this study was to validate the Korean version of the MDS-UPDRS.MethodsAltogether, 362 patients in 19 centers were recruited for this study. We translated the MDS-UPDRS to Korean using the translation-back translation method and cognitive pretesting. We performed both confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses to validate the scale. We calculated the comparative fit index (CFI) for confirmatory factor analysis, and used unweighted least squares for exploratory factor analysis.ResultsThe CFI was higher than 0.90 for all parts of the scale. Exploratory factor analysis also showed that the Korean MDS-UPDRS has the same number of factors in each part as the English version.ConclusionsThe Korean MDS-UPDRS has the same overall structure as the English MDS-UPDRS. Our translated scale can be designated as the official Korean MDS-UPDRS.
- Research Article
43
- 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.08.001
- Aug 13, 2014
- Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
Relationships among cognitive impairment, sleep, and fatigue in Parkinson's disease using the MDS-UPDRS.
- Research Article
27
- 10.1002/mdc3.13030
- Sep 16, 2020
- Movement Disorders Clinical Practice
Parkinson's Disease Symptoms Have a Distinct Impact on Caregivers' and Patients' Stress: A Study Assessing the Consequences of the COVID-19 Lockdown.
- Research Article
- 10.3389/fneur.2024.1362763
- Apr 2, 2024
- Frontiers in Neurology
Limited research has explored the relationship between the valence of olfactory dysfunction and PD clinical symptoms. This study aimed to investigate correlations between the emotional valence of olfactory impairment and different domains of PD symptoms. PD patients who fulfilled the clinically probable PD diagnostic criteria of the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's Disease were recruited from the Center for Parkinson and Movement Disorders at Taichung Veterans General Hospital between October 2016 and April 2022. Demographic data and serial clinical assessments were collected, including the traditional Chinese version of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT-TC) and Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Thirty-five odors from the UPSIT-TC were classified into neutral, pleasant or unpleasant groups. Group comparisons, correlation analyses, and linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between olfactory impairment of UPSIT-TC odors, considering emotional valence, and MDS-UPDRS subscores across various domains. A total of 176 PD patients were recruited for analysis. Patients in the predominantly neutral/unpleasant odor impairment groups had higher MDS-UPDRS part III scores compared to those in the predominantly pleasant odor impairment group (pleasant vs. neutral vs. unpleasant odor impairment groups: 26.79 ± 13.59 vs. 35.33 ± 16.36 vs. 31.57 ± 12.37, p = 0.009). This trend was also noted in MDS-UPDRS rigidity, bradykinesia, and akinetic-rigid subscores (p = 0.003, p = 0.012, and p = 0.001, respectively). Correlation analysis revealed a weak but significant correlation between rigidity/akinetic-rigid subscores and misidentification numbers for neutral/unpleasant odors (all p < 0.05), with age, gender, LEDD, and disease duration as covariates. All significances were retained in the linear regression analysis. Our results emphasize the link between olfactory impairment of specific emotional valence, neutral/unpleasant odors, and PD severity, particularly with respect to akinetic-rigid symptoms. A concise olfactory test that focuses on both neutral and unpleasant odors may offer deeper insights into PD symptoms.
- Research Article
302
- 10.1093/brain/aws093
- May 4, 2012
- Brain
Parkinsonism, as a gradually progressive disorder, has a prodromal interval during which neurodegeneration has begun but cardinal manifestations have not fully developed. A systematic direct assessment of this interval has never been performed. Since patients with idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder are at very high risk of parkinsonism, they provide a unique opportunity to observe directly the development of parkinsonism. Patients with idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder in an ongoing cohort study were evaluated annually with several quantitative motor measures, including the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Purdue Pegboard, alternate-tap test and timed up-and-go. Patients who developed parkinsonism were identified from this cohort and matched according to age to normal controls. Their results on motor testing from the preceding years were plotted, and then assessed with regression analysis, to determine when markers first deviated from normal values. Sensitivity and specificity of quantitative motor markers for diagnosing prodromal parkinsonism were assessed. Of 78 patients, 20 developed parkinsonism. On regression analysis, the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale first intersected normal values at an estimated 4.5 years before diagnosis. Voice and face akinesia intersected earliest (estimated prodromal interval = 9.8 years), followed by rigidity (4.4 years), gait abnormalities (4.4 years) and limb bradykinesia (4.2 years). Quantitative motor tests intersected normal values at longer prodromal intervals than subjective examination (Purdue Pegboard = 8.6 years, alternate-tap = 8.2, timed up-and-go = 6.3). Using Purdue Pegboard and the alternate-tap test, parkinsonism could be detected with 71-82% sensitivity and specificity 3 years before diagnosis, whereas a Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score >4 identified prodromal parkinsonism with 88% sensitivity and 94% specificity 2 years before diagnosis. Removal of action tremor scores improved sensitivity to 94% and specificity to 97% at 2 years before diagnosis (cut-off >3). Although distinction between conditions was often difficult, prodromal dementia with Lewy bodies appeared to have a slower progression than Parkinson's disease (prodromal interval = 6.0 versus 3.8 years). Using a cut-off of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale >3 (excluding action tremor), 25% of patients with 'still-idiopathic' REM sleep behaviour disorder demonstrated evidence of possible prodromal parkinsonism. Therefore, using direct assessment of motor examination before parkinsonism in a REM sleep behaviour disorder, we have estimated a prodromal interval of ∼4.5 years on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale; other quantitative markers may detect parkinsonism earlier. Simple quantitative motor measures may be capable of reliably detecting parkinsonism, even before a clinical diagnosis can be made by experienced movement disorders neurologists.
- Research Article
7
- 10.1111/ncn3.179
- Mar 6, 2015
- Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience
BackgroundLittle is known about single administration of zonisamide in Parkinson's disease patients.AimWe aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of zonisamide monotherapy in early Parkinson's disease patients.MethodsA total of 10 untreated (de novo) patients with Yahr stage I or II participated. Zonisamide was given at a daily dose of 25 mg for 1 month and increased to 50 mg for the next 2 months. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale parts I–IV and tremor‐related Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (items 16, 20 and 21) were examined every month. Serum zonisamide concentrations and urinary homovanillic acid concentrations were measured. Three patients had rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder. Sleep condition was asked to patients? spouses.ResultsAt 1 month after zonisamide treatment, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale scores did not differ from the baseline scores statistically. At 2 and 3 months after zonisamide treatment, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III and tremor‐related scores were reduced significantly compared with pretreatment (P < 0.01). Sleep state improved markedly in three patients with rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder at 1–2 months after zonisamide treatment. The mean serum concentrations of zonisamide (standard deviation) were 2.0 μg/mL (0.9) at 25 mg/day and 6.6 μg/mL (2.3) at 50 mg/day. Urinary homovanillic acid concentrations were not altered before and after zonisamide administration.ConclusionsThe present study showed that zonisamide monotherapy improved motor and sleep dysfunction in de novo patients with early Parkinson's disease. Significant therapeutic benefits were present within 1–2 months. Finally, the data highlight a therapeutic potential of zonisamide monotherapy in tremor‐predominant patients with early Parkinson's disease.
- Research Article
9
- 10.1007/s10072-020-04406-5
- Apr 23, 2020
- Neurological Sciences
Non-motor symptoms (NMSs) negatively impact the health-related quality of life (HrQOL) of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). The Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) is a comprehensive scale for evaluating PD. It remains unclear whether the NMSs evaluated with MDS-UPDRS are predictive of HrQOL. This study aimed to investigate whether NMSs, as evaluated with the MDS-UPDRS, could predict the HrQOL of patients with PD. We conducted a 2-year retrospective observational cohort study assessing 108 patients with PD who were recruited from a single tertiary center between January 2015 and December 2017. MDS-UPDRS was used to assess NMSs and motor symptoms and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) to measure patients' HrQOL. The median age of patients was 69years, and 65.7% were female. The median MDS-UPDRS part I, part II, part III, and PDQ-39-summary index scores were 8, 10, 22, and 25, respectively. The final stepwise multiple linear regression model showed that female sex (standard partial regression coefficient β = 0.131, P < 0.05) and baseline MDS-UPDRS part I (β = 0.272, P < 0.01) and part II (β = 0.571, P < 0.01) scores significantly predicted the PDQ-39-SI scores at the 2-year follow-up. In addition to motor symptoms, NMSs at the 2-year follow-up may be useful for predicting the HrQOL of patients with PD. In clinical practice, MDS-UPDRS-guided assessment and treatment of motor symptoms and NMSs may contribute to improving HrQOL in patients with PD.
- Research Article
185
- 10.1002/mds.23740
- Apr 29, 2011
- Movement Disorders
Bradykinesia encompasses slowness, decreased movement amplitude, and dysrhythmia. Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-based bradykinesia-related items require that clinicians condense abnormalities in speed, amplitude, fatiguing, hesitations, and arrests into a single score. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability of a modified bradykinesia rating scale, which separately assesses speed, amplitude, and rhythm and its correlation with kinematic measures from motion sensors. Fifty patients with Parkinson's disease performed Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale-directed finger tapping, hand grasping, and pronation-supination while wearing motion sensors. Videos were rated blindly and independently by 4 clinicians. The modified bradykinesia rating scale and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale demonstrated similar inter- and intrarater reliability. Raters placed greater weight on amplitude than on speed or rhythm when assigning a Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale score. Modified bradykinesia rating scale scores for speed, amplitude, and rhythm correlated highly with quantitative kinematic variables. The modified bradykinesia rating scale separately captures bradykinesia components with interrater and intrarater reliability similar to that of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale. Kinematic sensors can accurately quantify speed, amplitude, and rhythm to aid in the development and evaluation of novel therapies in Parkinson's disease.
- Research Article
12
- 10.1002/mds.29279
- Dec 8, 2022
- Movement Disorders
Original clinimetric analyses by the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) developers did not confirm the validity of summing the scores of its parts. Recent studies used the summed score of Part III and other parts as efficacy outcomes. The aim of this study was to establish whether summing scores of MDS-UPDRS parts can be recommended. Using 7466 full MDS-UPDRS scores, we applied two-step factor analysis as in the original article to reassess the validity analysis with the threshold criterion set at comparative fit index ≥0.9. All comparative fit indexes of any combination including Part III were lower than 0.90. Summing Part III MDS-UPDRS scores with other parts is not clinimetrically sound. The MDS-UPDRS is a validated four-part scale with corresponding individual part scores and needs to be used within the limits originally presented. © 2022 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
- Research Article
9
- 10.3389/fneur.2021.651157
- Apr 7, 2021
- Frontiers in Neurology
Background: The literature is conflicting on whether rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) is associated with more rapid progression of Parkinson disease (PD).Objective: We aimed to determine (1) how stable probable RBD (pRBD) is over time and (2) whether it predicts faster PD progression.Methods: We evaluated participants in the Parkinson's Disease Biomarker Project (PDBP) who were prospectively assessed every 6–12 months with a series of motor, non-motor, disability, and health status scales. For aim 1, we calculated the incidence and disappearance rates of pRBD and compared stability of pRBD in PD with control subjects. For aim 2, we developed multiple regression models to determine if pRBD at baseline influenced the rate of change or average value at 48 months of 10 outcome variables.Results: We found that pRBD was a less stable diagnosis for PD than controls. In pRBD+ subjects, the Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III score progressed 2.78 points per year faster (p < 0.01), MDS-UPDRS total score progressed 3.98 points per year faster (p < 0.01), a global composite outcome (GCO) worsened by 0.09 points per year faster (p = 0.02), and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) mobility score progressed 2.57 percentage points per year faster (p < 0.01). The average scores at 48 months were 8.89 (p = 0.02) and 14.3 (p = 0.01) points higher for pRBD+ in MDS-UPDRS part III and total scores, respectively.Conclusions: Our study confirms that pRBD detected at the start of a study portends more rapid progression of PD. Knowing this could be useful for enriching clinical trials with fast progressors to accelerate discovery of a disease modifying agent.
- Research Article
8
- 10.3109/00207454.2012.711399
- Aug 21, 2012
- International Journal of Neuroscience
ABSTRACTAlthough gait and balance difficulties often occur together in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, it is believed that they are actually two separate symptoms. However, there are no simple tests to distinguish them. We have developed the self-administered Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) question to distinguish between gait and balance issues in PD and it was tested in 102 consecutive PD patients. The responses were compared with those of the walking and balance question (item # 2.12) of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), and the MDS-UPDRS motor examination and its subsets such as gait and postural stability (PS). Fifty-five patients reported balance difficulty on the BNI question and 64 reported walking and balance difficulty on the MDS-UPDRS question. Of the patients who reported balance difficulty on the BNI question, 74.5% had a PS score ≥2 and 25.4% fell at least three times per month. Of the patients who reported walking and balance difficulty on the MDS-UPDRS question, only 59.4% had a PS score ≥2 and only 10.9% fell three or more times per month. These statistically significant results suggest that the BNI question is better able to detect balance difficulty and its associated falls in PD and can be a supplement to the MDS-UPDRS or a stand-alone question to evaluate balance difficulty and its associated falls in PD.
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.