Pregnancy after bariatric surgery - does weight loss surgery influence maternal and fetal outcomes? Findings from the maternal outcomes of bariatric surgery and pregnancy study (MOMBARIS 2).

Diabetes and Pregnancy

To estimate the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) according to The International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria and the pregnancy complications in women fulfilling these criteria but who are not considered diabetic according to the Canadian Diabetes Association criteria. We estimated the rate of GDM according to the IADPSG criteria from November 2008 to October 2010. Then, we conducted a chart review to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes between women classified as GDM according to the IADPSG criteria but not by the Canadian Diabetes Association criteria (group 1; n=186) and nondiabetic women according to both criteria (group 2; n=372). Results were expressed as crude (odds ratio [OR]) or adjusted OR and 95% confidence interval (CI). The study has a statistical power of 80% to detect a difference between 16% and 8% in large for gestational age newborns (α level of 0.05; two-tailed). The rate of GDM using the IADPSG criteria was 27.51% (95% CI 25.92-29.11). Group 1 presented similar rates of large-for-gestational-age newborns (9.1% compared with 5.9%, adjusted OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.79-3.13; P=.19), delivery complications (37.1% compared with 30.1%, OR 1.37, 95% CI 0.95-1.98; P=.10), preeclampsia (6.5% compared with 2.7%, adjusted OR 2.40, 95% CI 0.92-6.27; P=.07), prematurity (6.5% compared with 2.7%, OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.53-2.27; P=.85), neonatal complications at delivery (13.4% compared with 9.7%, OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.84-2.49; P=.20), and metabolic complications (10.8% compared with 14.2%, OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.42-1.26; P=.29) compared with group 2. Women classified as nondiabetic by the Canadian Diabetes Association Criteria but considered GDM according to the IADPSG criteria have similar pregnancy outcomes as women without GDM. More randomized studies with cost-effectiveness analyses are needed before implementation of these criteria. II.

Maternal Fetal Health

Improved neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with coexisting gestational diabetes and preeclampsia in normal birthweight neonates- insights from a retrospective cohort study

Background: With the increasing need to explore the association between interpregnancy interval (IPI) and adverse maternal and neonatal outcome, numerous studies have been conducted worldwide. However, national reports of the IPI in China are lacking. Furthermore, except for age as a known factor for IPI and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, the effect of gestational age in previous pregnancy is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the IPI distribution between 2010 and 2019 and identify the effect of IPI and gestational age in previous pregnancy on adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in China. Methods: We used individual data from China's National Maternal Near Miss Surveillance System (NMNMSS) between 2010 and 2019. The surveillance system collected data prospectively on all pregnant and postpartum women admitted to the obstetric department. The analysis was restricted to women with records of at least two consecutive singleton births and without any complication that the NMNMSS collected during their previous pregnancy. Multivariable generalized linear models with the restricted cubic spline (RCS) were used to evaluate the effect of IPI on each adverse neonatal and maternal outcome on different categories of gestational age in previous pregnancy. Further analysis was performed in subgroups categorized by the gestational age of previous pregnancy. Results: Over the study period, 408,843 women with 420,810 pregnancies were enrolled in our study. The median and quartile range of IPI was 32 [22, 47] months. Few women (49,084, 11.67%) became pregnant again within an extremely short (≤6 months) or long (≥60 months) IPI, and over half (289,846, 68.88%) of the women became pregnant again after an IPI between 7 and 42 months. The risk of large for gestational age (LGA), Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) and gestational hypertension was increased with increased IPI, while the risk of spontaneous preterm and small for gestational age (SGA) was inversely decreased with increased IPI. The relationship between IPI and all the other adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes was in a “U” shape. The risk of adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes differs between subgroups stratified by gestational age in the previous pregnancy. The risk of spontaneous preterm and abortion at short IPI, iatrogenic preterm, GDM, preeclampsia or eclampsia and gestational hypertension at long IPI increased more when women were of a greater gestational age in the previous pregnancy. Conclusions: This was the first comprehensive exploration of the IPIs of Chinese women from a national database. In this research, both extreme short and long IPI were associated with a higher risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The gestational age in the previous pregnancy was also a determinant factor for the adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes in subsequent pregnancies. Funding Statement: This study was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFC1005100), the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, the China Medical Board (Grant No. 11-065), the WHO (Grant No. CHN-12-MCN-004888), and UNICEF (Grant No. 2016EJH016). Declaration of Interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics Approval Statement: This study was approved by the ethics committee of the West China Second University Hospital.

Periconception care of the infertile patient: Are we doing enough?

To investigate the prevalence of underweight, overweight and obesity as defined by pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) and the relationship between pre-pregnancy BMI and pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in women based on a retrospective cohort. Women registered via the Free Pre-pregnancy Health Check (FPHC) program from 2017 to 2019 in Hunan Province, China, were included to the study cohort. The data regarding maternal characteristics, pregnancy outcomes, and infant characteristics were retrieved from the surveillance system of the FPHC program. Logistic regressions were performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) to assess the associations between pre-pregnancy BMIs and the outcomes. Among a total of 398,368 women, 54,238 (13.62%) were underweight (BMI < 18.5 kg/m2), 51,251 (12.87%) were overweight (24.0 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 28.0 kg/m2), and 10,399 (2.61%) were obese (BMI ≥ 28.0 kg/m2). Underweight occurred more commonly in the 20–24 years old (17.98%), Han Chinese (13.89), college-educated (16.09%), rural (13.74%), and teacher/public servant/office clerk (16.09%) groups. Obesity occurred more often in the older than 35-year-old (4.48%), minority (3.64%), primary school or below (4.98%), urban (3.06%), and housewife (3.14%) groups (P < 0.001). Compared with the normal BMI group, underweight was associated with increased risk of low birth weight (LBW) (AOR = 1.25) and small-for-gestational age (SGA) (AOR = 1.11), but protected against gestational hypertensive disorder (GHD) (AOR = 0.85), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) (AOR = 0.69), macrosomia (AOR = 0.67), post-term pregnancy (AOR = 0.76), and cesarean-section (AOR = 0.81). Overweight and obesity were associated with increased risk of GHD (AOR = 1.28, 2.47), GDM (AOR = 1.63, 3.02), preterm birth (AOR = 1.18, 1.47), macrosomia (AOR = 1.51, 2.11), large-for-gestational age (LGA) (AOR = 1.19, 1.35), post-term pregnancy (AOR = 1.39, 1.66), and cesarean- section (AOR = 1.60, 2.05). Pre-pregnancy underweight is relatively common in Hunan Province, China. Pre-pregnancy underweight to some extent is associated with better maternal outcomes, but it has certain adverse effects on neonatal outcomes. Pre-pregnancy overweight, especially obesity, has a substantial adverse effect on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes.

Use of bariatric surgery has increased dramatically during the past 10 years, particularly among women of reproductive age. To estimate bariatric surgery rates among women aged 18 to 45 years and to assess the published literature on pregnancy outcomes and fertility after surgery. Search of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1998-2005) and multiple electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, Controlled Clinical Trials Register Database, and the Cochrane Database of Reviews of Effectiveness) to identify articles published between 1985 and February 2008 on bariatric surgery among women of reproductive age. Search terms included bariatric procedures, fertility, contraception, pregnancy, and nutritional deficiencies. Information was abstracted about study design, fertility, and nutritional, neonatal, and pregnancy outcomes after surgery. Of 260 screened articles, 75 were included. Women aged 18 to 45 years accounted for 49% of all patients undergoing bariatric surgery (>50,000 cases annually for the 3 most recent years). Three matched cohort studies showed lower maternal complication rates after bariatric surgery than in obese women without bariatric surgery, or rates approaching those of nonobese controls. In 1 matched cohort study that compared maternal complication rates in women after laparoscopic adjustable gastric band surgery with obese women without surgery, rates of gestational diabetes (0% vs 22.1%, P < .05) and preeclampsia (0% vs 3.1%, P < .05) were lower in the bariatric surgery group. Findings were supported by 13 other bariatric cohort studies. Neonatal outcomes were similar or better after surgery compared with obese women without laparoscopic adjustable gastric band surgery (7.7% vs 7.1% for premature delivery; 7.7% vs 10.6% for low birth weight, P < .05; 7.7% vs 14.6% for macrosomia, P < .05). No differences in neonatal outcomes were found after gastric bypass compared with nonobese controls (26.3%-26.9% vs 22.4%-20.2% for premature delivery, P = not reported [1 study] and P = .43 [1 study]; 7.7% vs 9.0% for low birth weight, P = not reported [1 study]; and 0% vs 2.6%-4.3% for macrosomia, P = not reported [1 study] and P = .28 [1 study]). Findings were supported by 10 other studies. Studies regarding nutrition, fertility, cesarean delivery, and contraception were limited. Rates of many adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes may be lower in women who become pregnant after having had bariatric surgery compared with rates in pregnant women who are obese; however, further data are needed from rigorously designed studies.

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare neonatal and maternal outcomes in twin pregnancies with elective cesarean section (ECS) and induction of labor (IOL) to better inform women during the counselling process. Materials and methodsWe conducted a cohort study including all twin pregnancies referred to the Department of Obstetrics at Kolding University Hospital, Denmark between January 2007 to April 2019 (n = 819). The primary analysis compared maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies planned for IOL with those planned for ECS after week 34. A secondary analysis compared maternal and neonatal outcomes in pregnancies who underwent IOL followed by successful vaginal delivery with outcomes in those who underwent ECS. ResultsAmong 587 eligible twin pregnancies, the rates of unplanned CS did not differ between those planned for ECS compared to those planned for IOL (38% vs. 33%; p = 0.27). IOL resulted in successful vaginal delivery in 67% (155/231) of those planned for IOL. Maternal outcomes did not differ between women who were planned for, or received, delivery with either IOL or ECS. Regarding neonatal outcomes, significantly more neonates required treatment with C-PAP in ECS group, than in the IOL group, and a higher median number of maturity days among mothers planned for ECS. However, no other significant difference in neonatal outcomes was observed when comparing successful IOL with successful ECS. ConclusionInduction of labor was not associated with worse outcomes compared to elective caesarean section in this large cohort of routinely handled twin pregnancies. In women with twin pregnancies indicated for delivery, who does not go into spontaneous labor, induction of labor is a safe option for both the mothers and their neonates.

1226: Pregnancy outcomes with specialist care after bariatric surgery

Study question Does bariatric surgery (BS) decrease the occurrence of adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in morbidly obese women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS)? Summary answer Patients with PCOS who underwent BS were at lower risk for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH), than other women with PCOS. What is known already Studies have shown that PCOS in pregnancy is associated with the occurrence of GDM, preeclampsia, PIH, preterm birth (PTB), cesarean section, miscarriage, hypoglycemia, and neonatal death. Patients with PCOS may have an increased risk of obesity compared to the general population, which magnifies the inherent insulin resistance many fold. PCOS patients who underwent bariatric surgery have a marked improvement in menstrual irregularities, hirsutism, T2DM, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. The benefit of bariatric surgery for PCOS patients and the improvement of pregnancy related complications has not been adequately studied, with most studies being small. Study design, size, duration This is a retrospective study using the Health Care Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) database from 2004 to 2014. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, we compared women with PCOS who underwent BS with a control group consisting of pregnant patients with PCOS of all BMIs who had not had weight reduction operations regarding pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes. Participants/materials, setting, methods The study group included pregnant PCOS patients who underwent BS and the control group consisted of pregnant patients with PCOS; who delivered between 2004 and 2014. Demographic and clinical characteristics, pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to control for all statistically different (P &amp;lt; 0.05) confounding effects. Each subject was included once per delivery. Main results and the role of chance We identified 9,096,788 pregnancies during the study period. 141 patients had a history of PCOS and underwent BS. The control group was composed of 14,741 patients with PCOS who didn’t undergo BS. Prevalence of PCOS patients who underwent BS increased from 0/1,000 in 2004 to 14.6/1,000 in 2014(p = 0.001). Those who underwent BS were more likely to be older than 35-years(42.6% vs. 18.7%, p &amp;lt; 0.0001), obese at delivery(44.7% vs. 22%, p &amp;lt; 0.0001) and have a history of previous cesarean sections (24.8% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.045). Differences in pre-gestational diabetes (7.1% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.086) and hypertension (12% vs. 8.4%, p = 0.125) .The BS group was less likely to develop PIH (aOR–0.39, 95%CI–0.21–0.72) and GDM( aOR–0.40, 95%CI–0.23–0.70) when compared to the control group. When comparing the PCOS with and without BS; differences in gestational hypertension(95%CI–0.22–1.30), preeclampsia(95%CI–0.19–1.15), spontaneous vaginal delivery (95%CI 0.58–1.3), operative vaginal delivery (95%CI 0.34–1.8), Cesarean section (95%CI 0.79–1.79), post partum hemorrhage (95%CI–0.12–1.94), transfusion (95%CI–0.1–5.22), preterm delivery (95%CI–0.56–1.75) and maternal infection (95%CI–0.27–2.07) were similar. Regarding neonatal outcomes of PCOS with and without BS: small for gestational age babies (95%CI–0.26–2.68), and congenital anomalies (95%CI–0.09–4.52) were similar. Limitations, reasons for caution Limitations of our study include its retrospective design. Information regarding the time interval between the surgical intervention and pregnancy wasn’t available. Nor was information on the type of gastric bypass performed. Wider implications of the findings: Our study demonstrated an association between bariatric surgery in the setting of PCOS patients and a reduced risk of GDM and PIH. Although no differences were noted in other delivery and neonatal outcomes, data was not compared to a group of strictly obese PCOS controls. Trial registration number Not applicable

Introduction Hepatitis B is the most common form of viral hepatitis. Much has been done for the prevention of Hepatitis B transmission from mother to child. However, there is still very limited evidence looking at maternal obstetrics and perinatal outcomes, such as gestational diabetes, antepartum haemorrhage and preterm labour, hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and small for gestational age, with Hepatitis B infected women. These adverse pregnancy outcomes, if significant, may affect future antenatal care and have a negative impact on public health. This study aims to determine the association between these adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes with maternal Hepatitis B carrier state. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study comparing adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in primigravid women who delivered singleton babies after 24 completed weeks of gestation and are carrier for Hepatitis B virus with those who are non-carrier for Hepatitis B virus, between 1992 and 2013 in Aberdeen Maternity Hospital. The adverse pregnancy and neonatal outcomes studied include hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, antepartum haemorrhage, preterm birth &lt;37 weeks, induction of labour, caesarean delivery, low birth weight and admission to neonatal unit. Data was extracted from the Aberdeen Maternity and Neonatal Databank (AMND), which was established in 1950 to record all pregnancy-related events occurring in Aberdeen city and district in the northeast of Scotland. Statistical analysis was done with SPSS version 21 using independent samples t-test for normally distributed continuous variables and chi-squared test for categorical variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis using a multilevel random effects regression model was also conducted to adjust for confounding factors. Results The data set contained a sample size of 35116 primigravid women with singleton pregnancies, with 59 being carrier for Hepatitis B virus (represented by positive HBsAg status). HBsAg-positive women had significantly lower mean Body Mass Index and were more likely to be from the manual social class (registrar general’s occupation-based social class). On unadjusted analysis, there were no significant differences in the prevalence of all maternal and perinatal outcomes in both groups. However, after adjusting for confounding factors, HBsAg-positive women were more likely to have smaller babies (aOR 4.28; 95% CI 1.57-11.66). Conclusion Our study suggested higher frequencies of low birth weight babies in women with hepatitis B infection. We found no statistically significant differences in other adverse pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. As current evidence still shows inconsistent results, further research evaluating the possible effects of Hepatitis B viraemia on pregnancy outcomes is justified.

Background Antenatal care plays a crucial role in ensuring optimal maternal and neonatal health outcomes. However, disparities in access to prenatal care persist, with a subset of pregnant women failing to register for antenatal care, referred to as "unbooked" or "unregistered" pregnancies. This study aims to investigate the impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, considering various demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors. Understanding the factors influencing registration status and its implications on maternal and fetal health outcomes is essential for developing targeted interventions to improve prenatal care access and enhance overall pregnancy outcomes. Objective To see the difference in obstetrical complications along with feto-maternal outcomes in both registered and unregistered antenatal cases and to determine the correlation of maternal and fetal outcomes with antenatal care. Materials and methods This two-year observational study at Dr. D.Y. Patil Medical College's Obstetrics and Gynecology IPD in Pimpri, Pune, examined maternal and fetal outcomes in registered and unregistered pregnancies. Consent was obtained, and patients were categorized as registered and unregistered based on the number of antenatal visits. This was an observational prospective cohort study. Data on socioeconomic factors like income and education were analyzed to assess their association with registration status. Maternal outcomes included preterm delivery and complications such as preeclampsia, gestational diabetes, oligohydramnios, premature rupture of membranes, anemia, and postpartum complications. Fetal outcomes included birth weight and NICU admissions. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression, were used to examine relationships between variables and registration status. Results This study analyzed 502 cases, comprising 251 registered and 251 unregistered pregnancies, to investigate the impact of antenatal registration on maternal and fetal outcomes. Significant associations were observed between socioeconomic factors, such as lower income and education levels in unregistered pregnancies.Specifically, 46 (18.3%) unregistered cases were in the lowest income bracket, while 103 (41.0%) were in the lower-middle bracket, and the majority (132, 52.2%) had only completed secondary education. Unregistered pregnancies were linked to a higher prevalence of adverse outcomes, including preterm delivery (101, 40.23%), anemia (178, 70.9%), hypertensive disorders (30, 11.9%), gestational diabetes mellitus (16, 6.37%), fetal growth restriction (39, 15.3%), low birth weight (181, 72.1%), and NICU admissions (112, 44.6%), compared to registered pregnancies. Conclusion In conclusion, this study highlights the significant impact of registration status on pregnancy outcomes, emphasizing the need for comprehensive interventions to improve prenatal care access and to promote maternal and neonatal health equity. By addressing socioeconomic barriers and implementing targeted interventions, healthcare systems can strive towardensuring optimal pregnancy outcomes for all expectant mothers. This is done by ensuring that all antenatal patients are registered for prenatal care by involving a combination of strategies focused on support, education, and accessibility.

Background: Obesity poses a substantial health burden globally, increasing the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes in reproductive-age females. This study aimed to investigate the impact of bariatric surgery on adverse maternal outcomes in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Methods: A retrospective single-center study was conducted at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between 2020 and 2023. The study included 48 out of 438 individuals aged 18-45, who underwent bariatric surgery and subsequently became pregnant. Exclusion criteria comprised patients with primary endometriosis, family history of infertility, uterine fibroids, endometrial tuberculosis, or incomplete data. Data related to the first pregnancy after bariatric surgery were collected and analyzed. Results: Among the 48 females studied, pregnancy complications included maternal anemia (54.2%), vitamin D insufficiency (35.4%), gestational diabetes (8.3%), and pregnancy-induced hypertension (4.2%). Modes of delivery comprised spontaneous vaginal delivery (62.5%), miscarriage (33.3%), and cesarean section (22.9%). The mean number of pregnancies after bariatric surgery was 1.58 ± 0.89, the mean age of patients after the first child&amp;apos;s birth post-bariatric surgery was 33.31 ± 5.54 years, the mean duration between bariatric surgery and conception was 4.05 ± 2.49 years, and the mean weight before pregnancy and weight gain during pregnancy were 67.69 ± 15.55 kg and 10.74 ± 683 kg, respectively. The mean weeks of gestation were 37.4 ± 4.51. Conclusion: This study highlights a significant relationship between bariatric surgery and the duration of conception. However, no significant association was observed between the type of bariatric surgery and pregnancy complications, mode of delivery, or outcome of the first pregnancy post-surgery. Further research is warranted to investigate the heterogeneity of bariatric surgeries by comparing their types and their effects on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.

Gestational diabetes mellitus and COVID-19: results from the COVID-19–Related Obstetric and Neonatal Outcome Study (CRONOS)