Abstract

Predictions during language comprehension are currently discussed from many points of view. One area where predictive processing may play a particular role concerns poetic language that is regularized by meter and rhyme, thus allowing strong predictions regarding the timing and stress of individual syllables. While there is growing evidence that these prosodic regularities influence language processing, less is known about the potential influence of prosodic preferences (binary, strong-weak patterns) on neurophysiological processes. To this end, the present electroencephalogram (EEG) study examined whether the predictability of strong and weak syllables within metered speech would differ as a function of meter (trochee vs. iamb). Strong, i.e., accented positions within a foot should be more predictable than weak, i.e., unaccented positions. Our focus was on disyllabic pseudowords that solely differed between trochaic and iambic structure, with trochees providing the preferred foot in German. Methodologically, we focused on the omission Mismatch Negativity (oMMN) that is elicited when an anticipated auditory stimulus is omitted. The resulting electrophysiological brain response is particularly interesting because its elicitation does not depend on a physical stimulus. Omissions in deviant position of a passive oddball paradigm occurred at either first- or second-syllable position of the aforementioned pseudowords, resulting in a 2-by-2 design with the factors foot type and omission position. Analyses focused on the mean oMMN amplitude and latency differences across the four conditions. The result pattern was characterized by an interaction of the effects of foot type and omission position for both amplitudes and latencies. In first position, omissions resulted in larger and earlier oMMNs for trochees than for iambs. In second position, omissions resulted in larger oMMNs for iambs than for trochees, but the oMMN latency did not differ. The results suggest that omissions, particularly in initial position, are modulated by a trochaic preference in German. The preferred strong-weak pattern may have strengthened the prosodic prediction, especially for matching, trochaic stimuli, such that the violation of this prediction led to an earlier and stronger prediction error. Altogether, predictive processing seems to play a particular role in metered speech, especially if the meter is based on the preferred foot type.

Highlights

  • Spoken language is based on »quasi-regular« properties, exemplified by physiological and articulatory processes such as the vibration pattern of the vocal folds or the repetitious sequence of consonants and vowels (Greenberg et al, 2003; Reetz and Jongman, 2008). That these regularities are considered within models of speech processing that capitalize on predictions (e.g., Kutas et al, 2011; Pickering and Garrod, 2013; Schröger et al, 2015; Kuperberg and Jaeger, 2016)

  • Omission Mismatch Negativity (MMN) were reliably elicited in the typical time windows between 100 and 200 ms after deviance onset

  • For both mean and peak amplitudes, omission MMNs were larger for omissions in the second syllable than in the first syllable

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Spoken language is based on »quasi-regular« properties, exemplified by physiological and articulatory processes such as the vibration pattern of the vocal folds or the repetitious sequence of consonants and vowels (Greenberg et al, 2003; Reetz and Jongman, 2008). Oddball paradigms elicit typical ERPresponses to both deviants and standards, and an additional mismatch response to the deviant, best seen in the difference wave form between deviant ERP and standard ERP This response is called Mismatch Negativity (MMN), typically elicited by physical stimulus changes as well as violations of higher-order regularities (Näätänen, 1995; Näätänen and Alho, 1997; Winkler, 2007). We expect that the omission MMN is sensitive to patterns of strong and weak syllables (i.e., higher-order regularities), and we hypothesize that the omission of sounds in strong positions of trochaic patterns lead to the strongest omission response. We expect that this 2 × 2-design would show an interaction of the effects of position of omission (first syllable, second syllable) and foot type (trochee, iamb)

Participants
Design
Procedure
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.