Abstract

Landslide of loose rock mass at mountain tunnel exit occurs easily, and prediction of landslide position is one of the engineering problems to be solved urgently. Currently, existing and used prediction methods, such as field monitoring measurement, numerical analysis, nonlinear theories, and the geometric method, play a very important role and have their limitations. For example, there is a bigger difference between calculation mode by Wang et al.’s method and actual engineering situation; besides, there exists a relatively big discrepancy between the predicted and true position. Aiming to solve this problem, this article combined theoretical analysis and actual engineering situation to establish an optimal calculation mode. At the same time, this article re‐deduced instability criteria based on the stress‐transferring theory and examined the factors that influence solutions. The improved method can predict landslide position more accurately because the parameters (β, s, H, α, γ, c, φ, and T) related to the occurrence of landslide are taken into consideration. It is pointed out that landslide possibly occurs in the case of Δ ≥ 0 and Y ≤ 0. In addition, the equations s1 < s < s2 and 0 ≤ s ≤ H/sin α can determine landslide position accurately. The method is applied to two engineering examples, and the calculation results show that the deviations of predictive position from the actual landslide position are only 0.10% and 0.07%, respectively, indicating that prediction results are accurate and reliable. It is suggested that the proposed method is a useful tool in the design of tunnel engineering.

Highlights

  • Speaking, the run-through of a tunnel should choose a two-way excavation method

  • When a mountain tunnel is excavated to the exit in a one-way driving way, landslides occur for the cover is thinner and the rock mass is in the junction of soil and rock with obvious lithology changes and serious efflorescence

  • It is the focal point of geological hazard prevention in tunnel construction [11,12,13]. erefore, it is of great practical significance to expand prediction of landslide and landslide position at mountain tunnel exit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The run-through of a tunnel should choose a two-way excavation method. The work face of mountain tunnel exit is difficult to unfold and a two-way excavation method is even invalid due to the constraints of geographical conditions, construction progress delay, and other factors in the construction [4,5,6]. At this point, it is often necessary to adopt the construction form of one-way driving to be out of a tunnel according to the actual engineering situation. The proposed method is applied to two case histories for verification

Failure Modes of Shallow-Buried Tunnel
Instability Criterion and Prediction of Landslide Position
D Excavation direction d
Derivation of Instability Criterion
Case 1
Case 2
Weakly weathered tuff Boundary of weathered zones
Findings
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.