Abstract
Certain “Big Five” factors of personality are theoretically and empirically related to workplace deviance. However, the Big Five are complex in that each is comprised of multiple facets. To advance theory on how personality relates to deviant behaviors, and to maximize the prediction afforded by personality variables, we investigated the relations between the Big Five and their constituent facets and workplace deviance. Usable data were collected from 198 participants with work experience. We found that the Big Five obscured important facet–criterion relations. For example, Neuroticism did not predict deviant behaviors, whereas its facet, Anger, was a significant predictor. Moreover, five facets selected a priori by expert judges were found to predict 91% as much variance in deviance as did the Big Five. The implications are two-fold: facet-level measurement and interpretation in personnel contexts may be more (a) efficient and (b) defensible. Efficiency is enhanced by minimizing the items needed to achieve comparable prediction, and defensibility is enhanced by having a clearer content domain that is more readily linked to job dimensions. Finally, theoretical understanding is likely to be greater for facets than for factors because the former provide clearer insights regarding the conceptual linkage with the criterion.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
