Abstract

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the most effective treatments for major depression disorder (MDD). ECT can induce neurogenesis and synaptogenesis in hippocampus, which contains distinct subfields, e.g., the cornu ammonis (CA) subfields, a granule cell layer (GCL), a molecular layer (ML), and the subiculum. It is unclear which subfields are affected by ECT and whether we predict the future treatment response to ECT by using volumetric information of hippocampal subfields at baseline? In this study, 24 patients with severe MDD received the ECT and their structural brain images were acquired with magnetic resonance imaging before and after ECT. A state-of-the-art hippocampal segmentation algorithm from Freesurfer 6.0 was used. We found that ECT induced volume increases in CA subfields, GCL, ML and subiculum. We applied a machine learning algorithm to the hippocampal subfield volumes at baseline and were able to predict the change in depressive symptoms (r = 0.81; within remitters, r = 0.93). Receiver operating characteristic analysis also showed robust prediction of remission with an area under the curve of 0.90. Our findings provide evidence for particular hippocampal subfields having specific roles in the response to ECT. We also provide an analytic approach for generating predictions about clinical outcomes for ECT in MDD.

Highlights

  • Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the most effective treatments for major depression disorder (MDD)

  • All p-values survived the Bonferroni correction. These results indicated that patients with smaller hippocampal subfields might achieve betters outcome from ECT

  • Our results showed that lower volumes of specific subfields, such as CA3, CA4, granule cell layer (GCL), molecular layer (ML) and subiculum were associated with better outcomes of ECT

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the most effective treatments for major depression disorder (MDD). ECT can induce neurogenesis and synaptogenesis in hippocampus, which contains distinct subfields, e.g., the cornu ammonis (CA) subfields, a granule cell layer (GCL), a molecular layer (ML), and the subiculum It is unclear which subfields are affected by ECT and whether we predict the future treatment response to ECT by using volumetric information of hippocampal subfields at baseline? Neurogenesis were considered sensitive to the mood disorder episodes, especially the manic episode, such as CA2/3, CA4, GCL, ML and subiculum[15] These subfields might in turn be responsive to the seizure-induced neuronal changes due to ECT. A recent hippocampal segmentation method could provide more accurate estimation of hippocampal subfield volumes than prior methods[14,21,22,23] It remains unclear which hippocampal subfields were reliably affected by ECT and whether subfield volumes at baseline could be predictive of ECT treatment response

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.