Abstract

AbstractFibers are now accepted as a means of reducing flexural and direct tension crack widths when used in combination with conventional reinforcement. However, methods used to predict in‐service crack widths incorporate performance parameters for fiber‐reinforced concrete (FRC) measured at much wider crack widths than those that occur in service. This may result in a discrepancy between tests and in‐service behavior, especially for FRC mixtures exhibiting rapidly changing performance immediately after cracking. This investigation has examined whether the crack width at which FRC performance is measured in standard beam tests has an influence on the accuracy of crack width predictions using Model Code 2010, and whether these predictions are realistic for a wide range of fiber types. The results indicate that predictions based on post‐crack residual strength appear reasonable for a wide range of fiber types, but that accuracy is improved if post‐crack performance is assessed at a crack width that more closely approximates the narrow widths that occur in service.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.