Abstract
The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael (1999) established that the factors set forth in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993) concerning the admissibility of expert testimony applies to technical testimony, including social science disciplines like economics. (Berger, 2000) As a result of these rulings, the trial court is obligated to play the role of “gatekeeper,” deciding which technical testimony is relevant and reliable. The four Daubert factors related to reliability are:
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
