Pre-Treatment 18F-FDG PET/CT reveals altered brain metabolic network connectivity in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Implications for cancer-related cognitive impairment.

Bioavailable 25(OH)D level is associated with clinical outcomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: An exploratory study.

Background5-Hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), an important DNA epigenetic modification, plays a vital role in tumorigenesis, progression and prognosis in many cancers. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) can involve almost any organ, but the prognosis of patients with DLBCL at different primary sites varies greatly. Previous studies have shown that 5hmC displays a tissue-specific atlas, but its role in DLBCLs at different primary sites remains unknown.ResultsWe found that primary gastric DLBCL (PG-DLBCL) and lymph node-involved DLBCL (LN-DLBCL) patients had a favorable prognosis, while primary central nervous system DLBCL (PCNS-DLBCL) patients faced the worst prognosis, followed by primary testicular DLBCL (PT-DLBCL) and primary intestinal DLBCL (PI-DLBCL) patients. Thus, we used hmC-CATCH, a bisulfite-free and cost-effective 5hmC detection technology, to first generate the 5hmC profiles from plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of DLBCL patients at these five different primary sites. Specifically, we found robust cancer-associated features that could be used to distinguish healthy individuals from DLBCL patients and distinguish among different primary sites. Through functional enrichment analysis of the differentially 5hmC-enriched genes, almost all DLBCL patients were enriched in tumor-related pathways, and DLBCL patients at different primary sites had unique characteristics. Moreover, 5hmC-based biomarkers can also highly reflect clinical features.ConclusionsCollectively, we revealed the primary site differential 5hmC regions of DLBCL at different primary sites. This new strategy may help develop minimally invasive and effective methods to diagnose and determine the primary sites of DLBCL.

The Construction of Novel Risk Scores in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Diabetes and the Identification of Glycosylation-Related Prognostic Biomarkers

Radiation Therapy Significantly Improves Survival Of Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Associated With MYC Translocation: A Report From The International DLBCL Rituximab-CHOP Consortium Program

Radiation Therapy Significantly Improves Survival Of Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Associated With MYC Translocation: A Report From The International DLBCL Rituximab-CHOP Consortium Program

Evaluation of T-Cell Compartment By Complex Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Reveals Distinct Patterns of T-Cell Exhaustion in DLBCL, FL and HL Patients

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) are common types of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and real-world evidence continues to be lacking for healthcare costs and utilization among DLBCL and FL patients. Our study aims to describe medical and pharmacy costs and health resource utilization and to characterize longitudinal treatment patterns among these patients. A retrospective observational study was performed among adult patients with DLBCL or FL using the US MarketScan (Truven) administrative claims data from 1 January2007 to 31 December2015. Diagnoses of DLBCL and FL were based upon ICD-9 codes. Identifications of treatment lines involved 30 lymphoma-specific anticancer systemic agents. Direct healthcare costs and utilizations were computed in the 1-year postdiagnosis period. Generalized linear models with a gamma link were used to compare healthcare costs between therapies with and without rituximab. A total of 2767 DLBCL and 5989 FL patients received frontline therapy. The majority received treatment within 3 months after initial diagnosis (DLBCL 79.9% and FL 62.4%) and were treated with rituximab or bendamustine either alone or in combination (DLBCL 67.4% and FL 84.7%). The total healthcare costs were US $15,555 and $10,192 per patient per month within 1 year following their initial diagnosis for DLBCL and FL, respectively. The medical costs were nearly twice as much as the drug costs for DLBCL patients. Both DLBCL and FL patients receiving rituximab had higher pharmacy costs but lower medical costs (p<0.001). During the first year following initial diagnosis, the resource utilization (per patient per month) of DLBCL patients included 0.21 inpatient admissions, 0.26 radiation therapy, 2.63 outpatient or office visits, 0.18 emergency room visits, 0.06 intensive care unit admissions and 0.10 stem cell transplantation. FL patients occupied less health resources than DLBCL patients. The healthcare costs and health resources utilized were considerable in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, especially DLBCL patients.

Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Patients with Composite Histology Have Improved Early Outcome Compared to De Novo DLBCL When Treated with R-CHOP

Loss of CIITA and MHC Class II Expression in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Is Not Explained by Methylation of CIITA Promoters III and IV.

PurposeMYC gene rearrangements in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients are associated with poor prognosis. Our aim was to compare patterns of 2[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET/CT) response in MYC + and MYC- DLBCL patients.MethodsInterim PET/CT (I-PET) and end of treatment PET/CT (EoT-PET) scans of 81 MYC + and 129 MYC- DLBCL patients from 2 HOVON trials were reviewed using the Deauville 5-point scale (DS). DS1-3 was regarded as negative and DS4-5 as positive. Standardized uptake values (SUV) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were quantified at baseline, I-PET, and EoT-PET. Negative (NPV) and positive predictive values (PPV) were calculated using 2-year overall survival.ResultsMYC + DLBCL patients had significantly more positive EoT-PET scans than MYC- patients (32.5 vs 15.7%, p = 0.004). I-PET positivity rates were comparable (28.8 vs 23.8%). In MYC + patients 23.2% of the I-PET negative patients converted to positive at EoT-PET, vs only 2% for the MYC- patients (p = 0.002). Nine (34.6%) MYC + DLBCL showed initially uninvolved localizations at EoT-PET, compared to one (5.3%) MYC- patient. A total of 80.8% of EoT-PET positive MYC + patients showed both increased lesional SUV and MTV compared to I-PET. In MYC- patients, 31.6% showed increased SUV and 42.1% showed increased MTV. NPV of I-PET and EoT-PET was high for both MYC subgroups (81.8–94.1%). PPV was highest at EoT-PET for MYC + patients (61.5%).ConclusionMYC + DLBCL patients demonstrate aberrant PET response patterns compared to MYC- patients with more frequent progression during treatment after I-PET negative assessment and new lesions at sites that were not initially involved.Trial registration number and date of registrationHOVON-84: EudraCT: 2006–005,174-42, retrospectively registered 01–08-2008. HOVON-130: EudraCT: 2014–002,654-39, registered 26–01-2015

Deep Peripheral T Cell Immune-Profiling in Relapsed/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Evaluation of Baseline Samples from the Epcoritamab Epcore NHL-1 Trial

Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy is effective in the treatment of early-stage H pylori–positive gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphomas

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) not otherwise specified is defined as monoclonal EBV+ B-cell proliferation affecting patients without any known immunosuppression. Non-neoplastic EBV+ cells proliferating in or adjacent to EBV- DLBCL were reported recently, but their clinical significance is unclear. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of EBV+ cells in DLBCL. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics of 30 EBV+ DLBCL patients and 29 and 604 EBV- DLBCL patients with and without EBV+ bystander cells (median age of onset 71, 67 and 62 years, respectively). Both EBV+ DLBCL patients and EBV- DLBCL patients with EBV+ bystander cells tended to have high and high-intermediate International Prognostic Index scores (60% and 59%, respectively), as compared with only 46% of EBV- DLBCL patients without EBV+ bystander cells. EBV- DLBCL patients with EBV+ bystander cells showed a significantly higher incidence of lung involvement than those without EBV+ bystander cells (10% versus 2%, P < 0.05). Furthermore, EBV+ DLBCL patients and EBV- DLBCL patients with EBV+ bystander cells had a poorer prognosis than patients without any detectable EBV+ cells [median overall survival (OS) of 100 months and 40 months versus not reached, P < 0.01]. Notably, EBV+ DLBCL patients and EBV- DLBCL patients with EBV+ bystander cells treated with rituximab showed overlapping survival curves (OS, P = 0.77; progression-free survival, P = 1.0). EBV- DLBCL with bystander EBV+ cells has similar clinical characteristics to EBV+ DLBCL. DLBCL with EBV+ bystander cells may be related to both age-related and microenvironment-related immunological deterioration.

A Multi-Omic Study Unveils a Clonal Population of TET2-Mutated Infiltrating T-Cells in Germinal Center B Cell Lymphomas (DLBCL and FL)

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) ranked fourth among all cancer types in Saudi Arabia, as reported by the Saudi Health Council in 2015. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common histological type of NHL. On the other hand, classical Hodgkin's lymphoma (cHL) ranked sixth and had a modest tendency to affect young men more frequently.Over recent decades, DLBCL patients were treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride, oncovin, and prednisolone (CHOP) alone. Adding rituximab (R) to the standard regimen (CHOP) shows significant improvement in overall survival. However, it also has a considerable effect on the immune system, impacting complement-mediated and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and causing an immunosuppressive state through modulating T-cell immunity via neutropenia, which can let the infection spread. This study aims to evaluate the incidence and risk factors associated with infections in DLBCL patients in comparison to patients with cHLtreated with doxorubicin hydrochloride (Adriamycin), bleomycin sulfate, vinblastine sulfate, and dacarbazine (ABVD). This study is a retrospective case-control study that included 201 patients acquired between January 1st, 2010, and January 1st, 2020. Sixty-seven patients had a diagnosis ofcHL and had received ABVD, and 134 had DLBCL and had received rituximab. Clinical data were obtained from the medical records. During the study period, we enrolled 201 patients, of whom 67 had cHL, and 134 had DLBCL. DLBCL patients had a higher serum lactate dehydrogenase upon diagnosis than cHL (p = 0.005). Both groups have similar response rates with complete remission/partial remission. Compared to cHL, patients with DLBCL were more likely to have advanced disease when they first presented (stage III/IV, DLBCL: 67.3 vs. cHL: 56.5; p = 0.005). DLBCL patients had an increased risk of infection as compared to cHL patients (DLBCL: 32.1 % vs. 16.4%; p = 0.02). However, patients with a poor response to treatment had an increased risk of infection compared to patients with a favorable response regardless of the type of disease (odds ratio: 4.6; p = <0.001).When using multivariate analysis, it is revealed that unfavorable therapeutic response continues to be the only predictor raising the probability of infection in the population (odds ratio: 4.2; p = 0.003). Our study explored all potential risk factors for the occurrence of infection in DLBCL patients who received R-CHOP versus cHL. The most reliable predictor of an increased risk of infection during the follow-up period was having an unfavorable response to medication. To assess these results, additional prospective research is required.