Abstract

BackgroundThere is a growing awareness that interaction between multiple genes play an important role in the risk of common, complex multi-factorial diseases. Many common diseases are affected by certain genotype combinations (associated with some genes and their interactions). The identification and characterization of these susceptibility genes and gene-gene interaction have been limited by small sample size and large number of potential interactions between genes. Several methods have been proposed to detect gene-gene interaction in a case control study. The penalized logistic regression (PLR), a variant of logistic regression with L2 regularization, is a parametric approach to detect gene-gene interaction. On the other hand, the Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction (MDR) is a nonparametric and genetic model-free approach to detect genotype combinations associated with disease risk.MethodsWe compared the power of MDR and PLR for detecting two-way and three-way interactions in a case-control study through extensive simulations. We generated several interaction models with different magnitudes of interaction effect. For each model, we simulated 100 datasets, each with 200 cases and 200 controls and 20 SNPs. We considered a wide variety of models such as models with just main effects, models with only interaction effects or models with both main and interaction effects. We also compared the performance of MDR and PLR to detect gene-gene interaction associated with acute rejection(AR) in kidney transplant patients.ResultsIn this paper, we have studied the power of MDR and PLR for detecting gene-gene interaction in a case-control study through extensive simulation. We have compared their performances for different two-way and three-way interaction models. We have studied the effect of different allele frequencies on these methods. We have also implemented their performance on a real dataset. As expected, none of these methods were consistently better for all data scenarios, but, generally MDR outperformed PLR for more complex models. The ROC analysis on the real dataset suggests that MDR outperforms PLR in detecting gene-gene interaction on the real dataset.ConclusionAs one might expect, the relative success of each method is context dependent. This study demonstrates the strengths and weaknesses of the methods to detect gene-gene interaction.

Highlights

  • There is a growing awareness that interaction between multiple genes play an important role in the risk of common, complex multi-factorial diseases

  • We have studied the power of Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction (MDR) and penalized logistic regression (PLR) for detecting gene-gene interaction in a case-control study for various interaction models

  • We considered a wide variety of models such as models with just main effects, models with only 2nd-order interaction effects or models with both main and interaction effects to represent the underlying genetic models for the effect of the associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) on the disease

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is a growing awareness that interaction between multiple genes play an important role in the risk of common, complex multi-factorial diseases. Genetic mapping of a trait involves implementation of a number of statistical strategies to identify relative position(s) of gene(s) influencing the trait in the genome. Such strategies have been a major breakthrough in identification of genes responsible for simple human diseases or traits. There is a growing evidence that these SNPs interact with each other in determining the susceptibility to complex traits or diseases The investigation of such gene-gene interactions presents new statistical challenges as the number of potential interactions between the SNPs can be large

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.