Abstract

An important consequence of the principle of freedom of contract is the function in trade of named contracts, unnamed and mixed contracts. The practice of data circulation shows the emergence of new contractual categories, whichdo not fit into any traditional form of property rights, while not being appropriate to classify in the category of unnamed contracts. A complex problem cannot be eliminated by simply shifting these new contract forms to the category of unnamed contracts. Many agreements that result in disputes, subsequently settled by courts, are not completely deprived of normative regulations, and these should therefore be used accordingly. The doctrinal isolation of independent categories of named, unnamed and mixed contracts is not a purely theoretical measure, since it is the sole way of achieving useful results in the process of law application. The doctrinal isolation of independent categories of named, unnamed and mixed contracts is not a purely theoretical measure, since it is the sole way of achieving useful results in the process of law application.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.