Abstract

Simple SummarySome diseases of dairy cows require the use of an antimicrobial and an anti-inflammatory drug in association to be fully cured and relieve pain. However, pharmacological treatments in cattle are subject to strict regulations and restrictions, and cow handling is not always easy and safe. For these reasons, only the antimicrobial is often administered, thus not fully applying the appropriate therapeutic protocol. This study investigated whether the use of a drug combining ceftiofur and ketoprofen in a single injection instead of ceftiofur alone can improve the healing and welfare of dairy cows affected by a pyretic inflammatory disease, such as acute puerperal metritis. The results show that the variation in the physiological parameters was similar between the two treatment groups, and daily activity and milk yield did not differ from healthy cows. However, affected cows that were treated with the combined drug seemed to be more likely to become pregnant within 120 days in milk than those that received the antimicrobial alone, having an estimated number of days open more similar to that of the healthy cows.This study aimed at investigating the benefits of using a drug combining ceftiofur and ketoprofen in a single injection on dairy cow welfare in the case of inflammatory disease with pyrexia, such as acute puerperal metritis (APM). Cows of an Italian dairy farm were examined between 5 and 14 days of calving: those with APM were randomly treated either with combined ceftiofur–ketoprofen (CD) or ceftiofur alone (C), starting from Day 0, and an equal number of healthy cows served as a control (CTR). Clinical examination and blood sampling were performed until Day 7 in each group according to specific schedules. Daily cow activity was recorded until Day 14 and daily milk production until Day 30. Additional data on fertility were collected until 120 days in milk (DIM). Data of 20 cows per group were analyzed. Body temperature and haptoglobin concentration dropped between Day 0 and 4 in both CD and C, approaching the level of CTR. The cure rate at Day 7 (body temperature < 39.0 °C) was 65 (CD) and 55% (C), without statistical difference. Neither cow activity nor milk production differed among the three groups. Reproductive performances in both CD and C were similar to CTR, but CD cows were 2.8 times more likely to be pregnant within 120 DIM than C, becoming pregnant about 14 days sooner. Both treatments (CD and C) have been effective in bringing the cows back to health conditions (CTR), and further studies would be needed to confirm the positive effect observed for CD on days open of the affected cows.

Highlights

  • Inflammatory conditions in dairy cows are responsible for cow depression, less locomotion, and reduced performances

  • Acute puerperal metritis in dairy cows was chosen to run this study because it is an inflammatory disease with pyrexia that is of interest for the dairy sector, which can be objectively diagnosed and classified, and for which the effectiveness of ceftiofur treatment has been already demonstrated [4,6,11]

  • This study investigated the benefits of administering a combined drug containing an antimicrobial and an anti-inflammatory instead of an antimicrobial alone in cases of inflammatory disease with pyrexia in dairy cows

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inflammatory conditions in dairy cows are responsible for cow depression, less locomotion, and reduced performances. Acute puerperal metritis (APM) is one of the most common and most serious inflammatory diseases during the puerperal period for the dairy cow [1]. It occurs typically within the first 4–10 days after parturition with a reported incidence rate ranging from 3 to 36% [1,2,3]. The condition is characterized by systemic signs of illness (fever ≥ 39.5 ◦ C, anorexia, dehydration, depression, and reduced milk production) associated with a foul-smelling, brown-red, watery uterine discharge, with or without retention of fetal membranes [3,4,5]. APM can cause high economic losses, mainly related to low fertility, decreased milk production, milk withdrawal, increased health expenses, and premature culling of up to +30% compared with healthy cows [6,9,10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.