Abstract

Clinical supervision (CS) has been organised and conducted around specific modernist principles, despite claims of the need for, or existence of, heterogeneity. A postmodernist perspective is used to challenge the idea that there is a correct structure (hierarchical) and function (developing supervisee self-awareness, detecting and resolving “real” problems) for CS. The meaning of CS can be locally constructed. In an egalitarian consultation, expertise is shared and multiplicity in clinical stories is celebrated. Practitioners are liberated in relation to deciding what approaches fit for the person in context. They feel strengthened by the cohesion of a group with a flattened hierarchy and, within limits, able to challenge existing policy and practice.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.