Abstract
The American Society of Anesthesiologists’ recently published Practice Guidelines for Postanesthetic Care1 contains a statement that is at best puzzling and at worst I believe sends the wrong message to the anesthesia community. To quote: “Assessment of neuromuscular function primarily includes physical examination and, on occasion, may include neuromuscular blockade monitoring.”There is now overwhelming evidence that traditional bedside or clinical tests of neuromuscular function such as head-lift, tidal volume, tongue protrusion, and others are very insensitive tests for the detection of residual neuromuscular weakness.2–5 To cite just one recent study “a reliable clinical test for detection of significant residual block... will probably remain elusive.”6 Thus one must ask what clinical signs the Task Force is referring to when they recommend a “physical examination”?The answer to the problem of postoperative residual neuromuscular block lies not with a postanesthesia evaluation, but with intelligent intraoperative monitoring of neuromuscular function ideally with a quantitative monitor.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
