Abstract

Transcutaneous stimulation of the human lumbar spine can be used to elicit root-evoked potentials (REPs). These sensory-motor responses display notable similarities to the monosynaptic H-reflex. The purpose of this study was to compare post-activation depression of the soleus REP to that of the H-reflex, when conditioned by either an H-reflex or an REP. Paired pulses were delivered 25–200ms apart and the recovery was characterized using three levels of stimulation. In all conditions, post-activation depression was reduced during contraction as compared to rest (P<0.001). REP doublets, delivered using an inter-pulse interval of 150ms, recovered to 68±8% of control during plantarflexion and 20±6% of control at rest. During contraction, recovery of a second REP was 65% of the corresponding recovery for a second H-reflex. The recovery of an H-reflex was equivalent, when conditioned by either an H-reflex or an REP, even though the spinal stimulus activated and/or engaged more afferent and efferent fibers. Our results suggest that the additional elements activated by the spinal stimulus did not affect the recovery of the H-reflex. However, the transcutaneous spinal stimulus produced more inhibition when it was assessed using two low-intensity REPs (P<0.05) suggesting that the pathway mediating the spinally-evoked response was more susceptible to being inhibited.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.