Abstract

Purpose: The paper focuses on how the problem of process capability assessment can be handled when taught, using convenient numerical and graphical means. The contents of the paper results from the authors’ own academic and practical experience, which suggested that many important steps are overlooked in the process of selecting and using capability indices.Methodology/Approach: Selected problems in capability assessment are illustrated with suitable examples and graphs.Findings: The authors’ experience is reflected in the paper, aiming to emphasize what matters and how, and what does not. Also, a new capability index is introduced.Research Limitation/implication: The style in which the problems are analysed may serve as a guide for further studies in the field and capability index applications.Originality/Value of paper: The paper also contains, aside from specific examples, some more advanced techniques, and is therefore accompanied by software readouts, since computer support is required in such cases.

Highlights

  • This paper presents our experience with education in the field of process capability assessment

  • During courses run in a selected corporate sector, we encountered many imperfections, ambiguities and problems that we tried to clarify in the paper in an illustrative way, using computational examples and graphical tools

  • The paper pays attention to the evaluation of capability indices and the term “robustness” that has its place in the theory of process capability assessment for all those who seek excellence (Zgodavova and Slimak, 2008)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

This paper presents our experience with education in the field of process capability assessment. The paper pays attention to the evaluation of capability indices and the term “robustness” that has its place in the theory of process capability assessment for all those who seek excellence (Zgodavova and Slimak, 2008) The practice, it appears, is such that only one specific capability index is applied, whatever the process, or such usage is even required in this context. Nowadays there are capability indices suitable basically for any situation, so there is no reason to improvise and use a specific index outside the conditions that define its application In this context, it is perhaps necessary to say that when an organization strictly requires that its suppliers calculate a specific index, such as Cpk , regardless of whether the index matches the suppliers’ production environment, it does not boost its credibility. What follows is the selection of an appropriate capability index

SELECTION OF A CAPABILITY INDEX
Symmetric Tolerance
Unbounded Tolerance
One-sided Tolerance
ROBUSTNESS AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE
EVALUATION OF A CAPABILITY INDEX
MULTIVARIATE INDICES
A ROBUST VERSION OF THE CPK INDEX
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.