Abstract

The strategies of politeness are not arbitrarily chosen by speakers in interaction. Instead, the choice of a strategy is constrained by a number of contextual features (socio-cultural variables), such as the relative power of the speakers, the social distance of the speakers and what the speakers happen to be negotiating at the time of speaking. This study focuses on the linguistic strategies of politeness, and more specifically on the positive politeness, as represented in fiction. The novel chosen is that of Montgomery’s Anne of Green Gables- a novel in which the main character Anne Shirley tries her best to establish common grounds with others until she achieves friendly and social harmonious relationships with nearly everybody. To show the above point, Brown and Levinson’s (1987) theory of politeness is adopted to account for the linguistic strategies, in addition to some subsequent contribution provided by Spencer-Oatey (2002) to account for sociality rights and obligations. This model is chosen to explore the relation between language use and the social relationship of the speakers. A point of departure, and according to O’Driscoll (1996), Brown and Levinson’s hierarchy of politeness strategies allows attention to positive to cover more ground than that subsumed under positive politeness (super-strategy 2). That is why baldly on-record (super-strategy 1) is used to pay positive face. The analysis shows that most of Anne’s directives in this speech event, which are linguistic realizations of both super-strategy 1 and 2, are meant to establish common grounds to achieve friendly and harmonious relationships with others.

Highlights

  • One of the prevalent pragmatic theories used in the analysis of literary works is that of politeness theory

  • A number of outputs are used to minimize the imposition including positive politeness strategy 1 'attend to H's wants, interests and concerns' as reflected in 'if you say so, I'll stop', positive politeness strategy 13 'give reasons' as in 'I can stop when I make up my mind' and negative politeness strategy 2 'hedges' represented by the use of 'rather' and negative politeness strategy 3 'be pessimistic' due to the use of the subjunctive 'would'

  • Directives 28, 30 and 33 in (28), (29) and (34)are linguistic realizations of super-strategy 1 where yes/no questions are issued with the discourse goal 'To get information from Matthew'. It is through such super-strategies and the sub-strategies that accompany them, the orphan female tries her best to establish a sort of familiarity and common ground in order to minimize the social distance and to initiate a smooth and friendly social relationship with Matthew who, despite the P and D variables, seems welcoming and interested in her talk and company from the beginning and in return, she feels comfortable and satisfied in her first meeting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the prevalent pragmatic theories used in the analysis of literary works is that of politeness theory. Face is the 'public self-image' which speakers in a society claim for themselves It has two related aspects, called 'positive' and 'negative' face. Speakers often perform acts which may be said to 'threaten' the face wants of both speakers and hearers and such acts are called face threatening acts ( FTAs). Such acts intrinsically threaten face or, in Brown and Levinson's (1987, p.65) words, 'run contrary to the face wants of the addressee and/or of the speaker'.

Positive politeness strategies
Summary
Functions fulfilled in relation to the strategies
11 And what does make the roads red?
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.