Abstract

We analyze institutions and social constructions as constituent parts of the policymaking process. We use Ingram and Schneider’s policy design framework, which suggests that, in degenerative contexts, policymakers distribute burdens and benefits to the population based on social constructions and using instruments that maintain or exacerbate some groups’ positioning to the detriment of others. However, we take a different path; we carry out a case study of the trans people policy in Uruguay, a context that could be considered progressive. Through category analysis, we identify social constructions and both formal and informal institutions that shape the issue context and its effects on policy formulation. The results indicate shifts in the social construction of trans people driven by a political strategy for agent coordination around the notion of diversity in a context of institutional opening towards more inclusive policies.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.