Abstract
Some of you are probably old enough (like me) to remember when polaroid sunglasses first became available. They were a sensation. Glare light is reduced by more than the background light with the result that you actually have better visionânot just less light in your eyes. They work best in situations where the sun is more or less in front of you and the combination of reflected light and near-specular scatter causes a bright glare that dominates your field of view. Because reflectance is a function polarization, the glare light (which has been reflected once) often has a horizontal polarization component that is much stronger than the vertical component. Normal background light (which has been reflected many times, at many angles) is more evenly divided between the two polarizations. Polaroid sunglasses simply discriminate against the horizontal component to reduce the fraction of glare light. If you look at the blue sky, which is a source of scattered light, through your sunglasses, you will find that rotating the glasses 90 degrees causes the sky to look dimmer (i.e., the sky has a strong vertical component). This effect is most strongly pronounced if you look in a direction perpendicular to the sun's rays. These two examples clearly demonstrate that scattering is polarization sensitive. When light is scattered, its polarization, as well as its amplitude and direction, is changed. The changes depend on the sample shape and material, as well as the polarization, amplitude, and direction of the incident beam. All three quantities must be considered to examine the effect of a sample on the reflected and transmitted light. A complete description of the polarization characteristics of an EM wave, before or after sample interaction, can be accomplished by straightforward measurements. Comparison of polarization amplitude and direction, before and after interaction with the sample, allows information about the sample material to be obtained. The trick is to relate the before-and-after changes to useful, or needed, sample characteristics. Chapters 3 and 4 discussed the relationship between smooth reflector topography and the resulting changes in the reflected light.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.