Abstract

We developed a prescribing guideline containing recommendations for the initial empirical antibiotic therapy in community or nosocomial pneumonia. The aim of the present study was to examine the impact of this measure. The prescribing guideline was implemented in May 1999. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients>65 years with community-, or nursing home- or hospital-acquired pneumonia hospitalised in our department of acute geriatric care between May 1999 and November 2000. The criteria assessed were: consistence with the guideline, clinical effectiveness within 72 hours, adequation with the isolated germs and intra-hospital mortality. Data were collected on 112 patients (63 women et 49 men; mean age=80 +/- 8 Years). The pneumonia was community-acquired in 52 cases (46%), nursing home acquired in 25 cases (22%) and hospital-acquired in 35 cases (31%). Antibiotic prescription was consistent with the guideline in 64 cases (57%). When the antibiotic therapy was consistent, the patients were more likely to improve within 72 hours (45/64 versus 23/48; p=0.01). Despite a tendency, the number of antimicrobial treatments adapted to the isolated microorganisms was not significantly higher in the consistent group (22/36 adapted treatments versus 10/20). The intra-hospital mortality (25%) was similar in the two groups consistent and not consistent with the guideline. SARM was the most frequent multiresistant bacteria that was isolated. The use of a prescribing guideline might improve the efficiency of empirical probabilistic antibiotic therapies. The impact of the guideline use on overall antibiotic costs and microbiological flora remains to be determined.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.