Planning and optimizing a digital self‐management support intervention: Acne Care Online

PROTOCOL: Interventions for promoting reintegration and reducing harmful behaviour and lifestyles in street‐connected children and young people

Rare cancers and cancer of unknown primary: Here's what you should know!

ObjectivesTreatment adherence in adolescents with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), ranges from 2%-93%, with the frequency of non-adherence ranging from 3%-57%.1 Non-adherence to a prescribed treatment regimen has significant clinical consequences....

Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus Associated with Surgical Procedures—New Jersey 2010 and Wisconsin 2011: February 27, 2015 / 64(07);165-170

BackgroundDental caries in adolescents remains a significant public health problem with few oral health promotion interventions aimed at reducing dental caries in secondary school-aged students. Previous oral health and mobile health (mHealth) research has suggested the need for the development of a school-based behaviour change intervention incorporating a digital component. This study aimed to describe the development process of a behaviour change intervention to improve the oral health of students aged 11–16 years attending secondary schools in the UK.MethodsA six-step process was used to develop the complex intervention informed by behaviour change theory and involving students, young people, parents and teachers in the process. The steps were: (1) identifying the target behaviours, namely tooth brushing with a fluoride toothpaste (2) identifying the theoretical basis and developing the causal model (3) reviewing the relevant literature and developing the logic model (4) designing the intervention with young people, parents and school staff (5) specifying the intervention content and (6) translating this content into features of the intervention and piloting.ResultsThe resultant intervention included a quality-assured classroom-based session (CBS) (guided by a lesson plan and teaching resources), delivered by school teachers which was embedded within the school curriculum. This CBS was followed by a series of (Short Message Service) SMS texts delivered twice daily to student’s mobile telephones with the content, duration and timing of the messages informed by involvement of students and young people.ConclusionsAn intervention to improve the oral health of secondary school students through improved tooth brushing was rigorously developed based on behaviour change theory and work with young people, parents and school staff. Further research is needed to evaluate the outcomes and processes involved following the delivery of this intervention.BRIGHT Trial Trial Registration ISRCTN12139369.

BackgroundThe public health policy “Making Every Contact Count” (MECC) compels healthcare professionals to deliver health behaviour change interventions during routine consultations. As healthcare systems continue their recovery from the impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency, supporting people to modify health behaviours is more important now than when the policy was introduced. The present study aims to: (a) examine changes in healthcare professionals’ awareness of, and engagement with the policy over a five-year period, (b) examine the psychosocial drivers associated with delivering behaviour change interventions, and (c) identify targets to increase healthcare professionals’ delivery of interventions.MethodsComparison of data from two independent representative surveys of NHS healthcare professionals working in the UK. In both surveys (July-September 2017; N = 1387, and February-March 2022; N = 1008), participants were asked to report: (1) awareness of the MECC policy, (2) the prevalence of MECC-related practice (perceived patient benefit, how often interventions were delivered, and time spent delivering interventions), and (3) perceptions of capabilities, opportunities and motivations to deliver behaviour change interventions. T- tests (independent-samples), MANOVA, multiple linear regression, and chi-square analyses were used to generate comparisons between the surveys.ResultsAwareness of the policy increased from 2017 (31.4%) to 2022 (52.0%). However, in 2022 compared with 2017, healthcare professionals reported (a) fewer patients would benefit from behaviour change interventions (49.1% versus 55.9%), (b) they delivered behaviour change interventions to a lower proportion of patients (38.0% versus 50.0%), and (c) they spent a lower proportion of the consultation time delivering interventions (26.5% versus 35.3%). Further, in 2022, compared with 2017, healthcare professionals reported fewer physical opportunities, fewer social opportunities, and fewer psychological capabilities to deliver behaviour change interventions. In the 2022 survey, perceptions of patient benefit and delivery of interventions was associated with greater perceptions of opportunities and motivations.ConclusionsHealth behaviour change interventions remain an important part of routine healthcare in the continued recovery from COVID-19 public health emergency, however reported engagement with MECC-related practices appears to have reduced over time. Future research should consider how healthcare professionals identify patients who might benefit from opportunistic behaviour change interventions, and to increase capabilities, opportunities, and motivations to deliver interventions during routine consultations.

BackgroundFlare-ups in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) are characterized by joint pain and swelling and often accompanied with fatigue, negative emotions, and reduced participation in activities. To minimize the impact of JIA on the physical and psychosocial development and well-being of young people (YP), it is essential to regularly monitor disease activity and side effects, as well as to support self-management such as adherence to treatment plans and engagement in general health-promoting behaviors. Smartphone technology has the potential to engage YP with their health care through convenient self-monitoring and easy access to information. In addition, having a more accurate summary of self-reported fluctuations in symptoms, behaviors, and psychosocial problems can help both YP and health care professionals (HCPs) better understand the patient’s condition, identify barriers to self-management, and assess treatment effectiveness and additional health care needs. No comprehensive smartphone app has yet been developed in collaboration with YP with JIA, their parents, and HCPs involved in their care.ObjectivesThe objective of this study was to design, develop, and evaluate the acceptability and usability of JIApp, a self-management smartphone app system for YP with JIA and HCPs.MethodsWe used a qualitative, user-centered design approach involving YP, parents, and HCPs from the rheumatology team. The study was conducted in three phases: (1) phase I focused on developing consensus on the features, content, and design of the app; (2) phase II was used for further refining and evaluating the app prototype; and (3) phase III focused on usability testing of the app. The interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.ResultsA total of 29 YP (aged 10-23, median age 17) with JIA, 7 parents, and 21 HCPs were interviewed. Major themes identified as the ones that helped inform app development in phase I were: (1) remote monitoring of symptoms, well-being, and activities; (2) treatment adherence; and (3) education and support. During phase II, three more themes emerged that informed further refinement of the app prototype. These included (4) adapting a reward system to motivate end users for using the app; (5) design of the app interface; and (6) clinical practice integration. The usability testing during phase III demonstrated high rates of overall satisfaction and further affirmed the content validity of the app.ConclusionsWe present the development and evaluation of a smartphone app to encourage self-management and engagement with health care for YP with JIA. The app was found to have high levels of acceptability and usability among YP and HCPs and has the potential to improve health care and outcomes for this age group. Future feasibility testing in a prospective study will firmly establish the reliability, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of such an app intervention for patients with arthritis.

BackgroundMeeting the needs of the growing number of older people is a challenge for health and social care services. Home-based interventions aiming to modify health-related behaviours of frail older people have the potential to improve functioning and well-being. Previous reviews have focused on whether such interventions are effective, rather than what might make them effective. Recent advances in behavioural science make possible the identification of potential ‘active ingredients’ of effective interventions, such as component behaviour change techniques (BCTs), and intended intervention functions (IFs; e.g. to educate, to impart skills). This paper reports a protocol for a systematic review that seeks to (a) identify health behaviour change interventions for older frail people, (b) describe the content of these interventions, and (c) explore links between intervention content and effectiveness. The protocol is reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 guidelines.Methods/designStudies will be identified through a systematic search of 15 electronic databases, supplemented by citation tracking. Studies will be retained for review where they report randomised controlled trials focusing on home-based health promotion delivered by a health professional for frail older people in community settings, written in English, and either published from 1980 onwards, or, for registered trials only, unpublished but completed with results obtainable from authors. Interventions will be coded for their content (BCTs, IFs) and for evidence of effectiveness (outcome data relating to behavioural and health outcomes). Analyses will describe characteristics of all interventions. Interventions for which effectiveness data are available will be categorised into those showing evidence of effectiveness versus those showing no such evidence. The potential for each intervention characteristic to contribute to change in behaviour or health outcomes will be estimated by calculating the percentage of all interventions featuring those characteristics that have shown effectiveness.DiscussionResults will reveal the strategies that have been drawn on within home-based interventions to modify the health behaviours of frail older people, and highlight those more associated with positive changes in behaviour and health. Findings from this review will provide a useful basis for understanding, developing, and implementing behaviour change interventions in this field.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42014010370Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-015-0138-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

ABSTRACTIntroductionThe MELD‐B project is a multidisciplinary research consortium with one of its aims focused on identifying childhood targets for the prevention of multiple long‐term conditions (MLTCs). Drawing upon the expertise of policy and practice stakeholders can inform research questions, data analysis, and contribute to meaningful and practical outputs. In pursuit of this collaborative approach, a stakeholder workshop, co‐designed with people with lived experience, was conducted to inform the next steps of the early prevention workstream of the MELD‐B project.MethodsThe research team worked with four public contributors to co‐design the workshop in terms of its aims and structure. This involved utilising a project‐specific animation and developing an imaginary persona to illustrate the life‐course concepts of MLTCs, with an emphasis on how early life factors can influence outcomes later in life. Stakeholders were divided into three groups, each with a mix of professions and facilitated by two team members. Jamboard (an online interactive whiteboard) was used to collate ideas, and overarching themes were identified. A poll was administered at the end of the workshop giving choices to prioritise time points for interventions.Results25 stakeholders with policy and practice expertise of childhood attended the workshop. Stakeholders were from backgrounds including integrated care boards (n = 5), healthcare practitioners (n = 3), academics (n = 4), council employees (n = 9) and not‐for‐profit organisations (n = 4). The workshop aimed to identify critical time points and targets in the early life‐course for feasible and practical interventions to prevent or delay MLTCs. Themes discussed included: mental health, educational attainment, early identification of health conditions and neurodiversity, nutritional choices, transitional periods, the virtual world, and intermediate outcomes on the pathway to future ill health. Stakeholders suggested that family‐targeted interventions were important to prioritise in early childhood; however, at secondary school age individual‐focused interventions may become more significant. A poll identified birth and ages 5–7 and 10–11 as the most important time points for interventions.ConclusionsPeople with lived experience should have central roles in shaping research questions, prioritising problems and engaging with stakeholders. Our workshop identified priority themes to inform prevention interventions using routinely collected and national cohort data.Patient or Public ContributionThe research team worked with four public contributors to co‐design the workshop in terms of its aims and structure. Public contributions helped to identify stakeholders to invite to the workshop and co‐produced PowerPoint slides to guide the workshop. In addition, the workshop utilised a co‐produced project‐specific animation and imaginary persona to help frame our research. Public contributors attended the workshop and helped to facilitate discussions by providing their own lived experience. Following the workshop, public contributors reviewed the themes identified by the research team from the discussions within the workshop. Finally, public contributors have also been involved in dissemination of the findings from this study, including this paper. Two of the public contributors are named co‐authors on this paper, and two did not wish to be named as co‐authors.

BackgroundMulti-disciplinary teams (MDTs) are common in paediatric rheumatology where UK standards of care state that all children/young people should have access to a paediatric rheumatologist, nurse, physiotherapist, occupational therapist and...

BackgroundHypertensive disorders of pregnancy affect around 10% of pregnancies and remain a major cause of maternal and foetal morbidity and mortality. Trials have shown that self-monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy is safe, but self-monitoring alone does not improve blood pressure control or pregnancy outcomes. This study aimed to develop and optimise a multicomponent intervention to support blood pressure monitoring, hypertension management and urine testing within current care pathways.MethodsRelevant literature, input from patient and public contributors (PPI) and stakeholder groups, and the researcher’s previous experience were used to develop an initial intervention. Think-aloud interviews and focus groups with women from diverse backgrounds with lived experience of hypertension in pregnancy and healthcare professionals provided feedback on the intervention prototype (n = 29). The MRC Framework for Developing Complex Interventions guided the processes to optimise the intervention’s acceptability and maximise engagement. A detailed tabulation of participants’ views and logic models was produced using the COM-B model of Behaviour Change.ResultsThe prototype intervention was acceptable and viable to both pregnant women with experience of hypertensive pregnancy and healthcare professionals. Emerging themes centred on how the intervention could be optimised within current National Health Service care pathways and the lives of pregnant women to support behaviour change. Key target behaviours to support the intervention included increasing understanding of blood pressure management, engagement with the intervention, monitoring blood pressure and urine and taking appropriate actions based on those readings. This informed the development of recommendations involving clear action timelines for women and evidence-based guidance to support decision-making by healthcare professionals. The findings were used to produce the multi-component My Pregnancy Care intervention, consisting of a smartphone application and an information leaflet to support blood pressure self-monitoring and proteinuria self-testing, self-management of antihypertensive medication and smartphone application use.ConclusionsThis research provided comprehensive insight into the needs of pregnant women with hypertension and their healthcare teams regarding self-monitoring and management of blood pressure. This supported the development of a tailored multi-component digital intervention that addresses barriers to blood pressure self-management by being user-friendly, persuasive and acceptable. It is hoped that the intervention will support the monitoring and management process, collaboration between healthcare professionals and women, clinical action and improved clinical outcomes.

ABSTRACTUnderstanding adolescents’ translation of HIV and AIDS-related behaviour change interventions (BCI) knowledge and skills into expected behavioural outcomes helps us appreciate behaviour change dynamics among young people and informs evidence-based programming. We explored the effects of adolescents’ exposure to BCI on their HIV risk reduction in selected schools in Nkhatabay and Mzimba districts and Mzuzu city in Northern Malawi. The study used questionnaires as instruments. Data were collected between January and April 2017. Adolescent boys and girls [n = 552], ages 11–19 were randomly sampled to participate. Data analysis was through multiple regression and content analysis. Respondents included 324 female [58.7%] and 228 male [41.3%]. Multiple regression analysis indicated that exposure to BCI did not affect risk reduction in the study area. The best stepwise model isolated sexual experience ([Beta = .727, p = .0001, p < .05]) as having the strongest correlation with the dependent variable – risk reduction. BCI exposure was stepwise excluded ([Beta = −.082, p = .053, p > .05]). There was therefore no evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between adolescent exposure to BCI and their HIV risk reduction. Overall there was limited BCI knowledge and skills translation to behavioural risk reduction. The study points to the need to evaluate and redesign adolescent BCI in line with current behavioural dynamics among young people in Malawi. The findings have been used to inform the design and programming of a model to be tested for feasibility through a quasi-experiment in the second phase of our project.

Objective: Communication of the content of a behaviour change intervention (BCI) involves clear description followed by appropriate recognition and interpretation. We investigated accuracy of recognition of BCI descriptions and the effects of training in the behaviour change taxonomy BCTTv1.Methods: Materials were 166 written descriptions of two BCIs previously written by 166 separate writers after viewing a video of the BCI. Each of the current participants (12 naïve and 12 trained in BCTTv1) was presented with a random sample of the written descriptions and asked to form groups of descriptions they judged to be describing the same intervention. For each participant, we assessed the number of groupings of BCI descriptions, their purity (containing only one BCI) and their differentiation (having a dominant BCI).Results: All except one participant classified the descriptions into more than two groupings. Naïve participants created significantly more groupings, fewer ‘pure’ groupings and less differentiated groupings (all Mann–Whitney p < .05).Conclusions: Written communications of BCI contents may not be recognised and interpreted adequately to support implementation. BCT taxonomy training may lead to some progress in interpreting the active content of interventions but, based on this limited study, further progress is needed if BCIs for accurate implementation.

Children and young people frequently report physical complaints that have no observable physical pathology known as medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). Research suggests that MUS are associated with substantial physical and psychological impairments and may have a negative impact on children's and young people's functional status and well-being in the long term. Due to the potentially complex needs of this group, children and young people with MUS may require timely access to suitable health and social care services to effectively manage symptoms and achieve their academic, social and personal potential. Families and professionals can offer important insights into the availability and appropriateness of current community and specialist health and social care services. This review is the first critical evaluation and synthesis of research that has examined families' and healthcare professionals' (HCP) perceptions of healthcare services for children and young people with MUS. A systematic search of electronic databases and manual searches of key journals and reference lists identified 17 papers from 15 studies for inclusion in the review. The review highlights the paucity of rigorously conducted research on this topic. Studies have been narrowly focused on the views of a homogeneous group of mothers and young people attending single centres. There has been some attempt to examine doctors' views, but the perceptions of children, fathers and health and social care professionals are absent or under-represented, and multi-site and longitudinal studies are lacking. Thematic analysis of the results from the included studies suggests that knowledge, communication, health beliefs and healthcare settings are factors that influence families' and HCPs' perceptions of services. Families report dissatisfaction with some HCPs' approach to managing MUS. The findings suggest that children and young people with MUS are at risk of receiving suboptimal care and support because there is insufficient research to inform high-quality, evidence-based practice.

Our patient and public involvement activities were part of a project aiming to develop a master protocol and National Institute for Health and Care research application for the PROTECT trial aiming to assess the effectiveness, implementation, and efficiency of antimicrobial stewardship interventions, to safely reduce unnecessary antibiotic usage by excluding severe bacterial infection in acutely unwell patients. Three public involvement sessions were held with representation from young people and parents, people from diverse backgrounds and people with experience of presenting to the emergency department with undifferentiated illness. The teleconference meetings lasted between 60-90 minutes, were recorded, notes were subsequently taken, and findings summarised. The data was collected on September 13, 2023, October 14, 2023 and February 28, 2024. Working with public involvement contributors and public involvement groups at the protocol development stage provided an opportunity for the public to shape and influence the trial. We were able to establish the feasibility of the trial in the proposed setting and gain insights into how it would be perceived by potential trial participants. Antibiotic resistance was viewed as an urgent problem and research evaluating new technologies was deemed timely and important. The platform design was considered appropriate, time and cost-effective. Deferred and electronic methods of consent were viewed as acceptable if a clear and inclusive explanation is provided. Having access to public contributors with relevant lived experience was an important resource for the trial team. Identification and recruitment of public contributors via working with existing public involvement groups across the UK enabled the trial team to involve public members with varied life experiences and from diverse backgrounds. This project was a good practice example of how public involvement groups and practitioners across the UK can work together to deliver public involvement that is inclusive of relevant groups.