Abstract
To the Editor.— While the basic premise of the study by DiBisceglie et al in the July 1986 issue of theArchives, that pityriasis rotunda may be a paraneoplastic phenomenon, is plausible, there are serious problems with the study and its test data that lead to questioning its validity. 1 The authors suggested that the macular, scaling, arcuate lesions on the torso of ten patients, seven of whom had hepatocellular carcinoma, might be cutaneous markers of their underlying disease, but the suggestion was made without submitting data to show that another source of such lesions, dermatophytosis, was considered in their differential diagnosis. Where are the results of such basic studies as their potassium hydroxide preparations, Sabouraud's fungal cultures, or cutaneous biopsies with periodic acid-Schiff stain and diastase digestion? The published photomicrograph of a cutaneous biopsy specimen is compatible with tinea when only a hematoxylin-eosin stain is used; the legend
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
