Pitfalls and capabilities of various hydrogen donors in evaluation of peroxidase-like activity of gold nanoparticles.

Abstract

Catalytic nanomaterials, widely used as substitutes of peroxidase, exhibit unique properties, which are unattainable for native enzymes. However, their activity is usually examined by means of substrates developed and methods standardized for horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The aim of the presented work was to determine the scope of usefulness of chromogenic substrates for gold nanoparticle (AuNP) activity studies under conditions which significantly extend beyond the activity range of a native HRP. The applicability of chromogens such as 3,3′5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), o-phenylenediamine (OPD), 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) beyond the typical range of pH, and for the samples of high concentration of hydrogen peroxide was examined. The conducted research confirmed the usefulness of ABTS and TMB in acidic media (pH 2.5–3.5). At the same time, potential interferences from chloride anion, unobservable for HRP-based assays, were indicated. Moreover, a number of potentially useful hints concerning relations of concentration of substrates and catalyst for aromatic amine oxidation (TMB and OPD) were proposed. By increasing the concentration of chromogens and thanks to assuring the relatively low conversion of the reaction, the stability of TMB and OPD oxidation product was improved even in acidic media. The comparative studies of H2O2 affinity to the surface of AuNPs in the presence of various hydrogen donors underlined the superiority of phenolic compounds over aromatic amines and ABTS in the case of the samples of relatively low H2O2 concentration. This work highlights some improvements in the methods of HRP-like activity characterization of NPs. It provides a critical analysis of the major challenges, which may emerge in a case of bioanalytical assays employing the catalytic nanoparticles as labels.