Piezo-photocatalytic coupling field driven efficient C2H4 synthesis: Proton-coupled electron transfer path optimization
Piezo-photocatalytic coupling field driven efficient C2H4 synthesis: Proton-coupled electron transfer path optimization
757
- 10.1002/anie.202101818
- May 5, 2021
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
18
- 10.1039/d4ta03676j
- Jan 1, 2024
- Journal of Materials Chemistry A
9
- 10.1021/jacs.5c00583
- Mar 4, 2025
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
1
- 10.1002/anie.202423666
- Apr 25, 2025
- Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)
49
- 10.1007/s12598-021-01809-x
- Aug 16, 2021
- Rare Metals
371
- 10.1038/s41467-022-32449-z
- Aug 10, 2022
- Nature Communications
10
- 10.1021/acsnano.4c03643
- May 10, 2024
- ACS Nano
39
- 10.1016/j.apcatb.2023.123177
- Aug 18, 2023
- Applied Catalysis B: Environmental
30
- 10.1002/aenm.202400851
- May 5, 2024
- Advanced Energy Materials
- 10.1021/jacsau.4c01221
- Jan 29, 2025
- JACS Au
- Research Article
157
- 10.1021/ar300289x
- Feb 13, 2013
- Accounts of Chemical Research
Proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) plays a crucial role in many enzymatic reactions and is relevant for a variety of processes including water oxidation, nitrogen fixation, and carbon dioxide reduction. Much of the research on PCET has focused on transfers between molecules in their electronic ground states, but increasingly researchers are investigating PCET between photoexcited reactants. This Account describes recent studies of excited-state PCET with d(6) metal complexes emphasizing work performed in my laboratory. Upon photoexcitation, some complexes release an electron and a proton to benzoquinone reaction partners. Others act as combined electron-proton acceptors in the presence of phenols. As a result, we can investigate photoinduced PCET involving electron and proton transfer in a given direction, a process that resembles hydrogen-atom transfer (HAT). In other studies, the photoexcited metal complexes merely serve as electron donors or electron acceptors because the proton donating and accepting sites are located on other parts of the molecular PCET ensemble. We and others have used this multisite design to explore so-called bidirectional PCET which occurs in many enzymes. A central question in all of these studies is whether concerted proton-electron transfer (CPET) can compete kinetically with sequential electron and proton transfer steps. Short laser pulses can trigger excited-state PCET, making it possible to investigate rapid reactions. Luminescence spectroscopy is a convenient tool for monitoring PCET, but unambiguous identification of reaction products can require a combination of luminescence spectroscopy and transient absorption spectroscopy. Nevertheless, in some cases, distinguishing between PCET photoproducts and reaction products formed by simple photoinduced electron transfer (ET) (reactions that don't include proton transfer) is tricky. Some of the studies presented here deal directly with this important problem. In one case study we employed a cyclometalated iridium(III) complex. Our other studies with ruthenium(II) complexes and phenols focused on systematic variations of the reaction free energies for the CPET, ET, and proton transfer (PT) steps to explore their influence on the overall PCET reaction. Still other work with rhenium(I) complexes concentrated on the question of how the electronic structure of the metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) excited states affects PCET. We used covalent rhenium(I)-phenol dyads to explore the influence of the electron donor-electron acceptor distance on bidirectional PCET. In covalent triarylamine-Ru(bpy)₃²⁺/Os(bpy)₃²⁺-anthraquinone triads (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine), hydrogen-bond donating solvents significantly lengthened the lifetimes of photogenerated electron/hole pairs because of hydrogen-bonding to the quinone radical anion. Until now, comparatively few researchers have investigated this variation of PCET: the strengthening of H-bonds upon photoreduction.
- Research Article
- 10.1149/ma2014-01/19/830
- Apr 1, 2014
- Electrochemical Society Meeting Abstracts
There is a growing appreciation of the important role that H-bond complexes can play in the mechanism of proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions. Until relatively recently it had been thought that PCET reactions always proceeded step-wise with sequential electron and proton transfer. Much of the recent fundamental interest in PCET stems from the realization that a third option is available, concerted electron and proton transfer or CPET in which the electron and proton both move in a single kinetic step. This interest in the concerted process has increased awareness of H-bonding states in PCET, since the concerted reaction occurs within a H-bonded intermediate. However, even if the proton and electron transfer is not concerted, the H-bonded complex formed in the process of proton transfer can play an important role in the PCET mechanism if it is sufficiently long-lived.Recently we have introduced a generally useful mechanistic framework with which to include H-bonding steps within an overall PCET pathway. This scheme, which for obvious reasons we call a “wedge”, is shown in Scheme 1 for the generic 1e−, 1H+ oxidation, AH + B = A + HB+ + e−. The front face in the wedge (in bold) is the standard electron transfer/proton transfer square scheme, with the two possible electron transfer reactions on the top and bottom edges, and the two possible proton transfers on the left and right edges. However, proton transfer reactions actually go through a H-bond intermediate, so a more accurate description of the proton transfer follows the dashed lines on the triangular sides of the wedge to and from the H-bond intermediates, A-H-B or A-H-B+, which are meant to represent the thermodynamically most stable H-bond complex in each oxidation state. If the H-bonded intermediate has sufficient lifetime, then electron transfer to/from the H-bond complex is also possible, represented by the rear edge of the wedge (thin solid line). If the proton moves from being more attached to A in A-H-B to being more attached to B in A-H-B+, then E° of this reaction is that of the CPET step, if the proton doesn’t move then the E° is simply that of oxidation of the H-bond complex. Either way, it is straightforward to show that E°(A-H-B0/+) has to have a value in between E°(AH0/+) and E°(A−/0). Thus the possibility of electron transfer through the H-bond complex opens up a pathway of intermediate potential for the overall reaction AH + B = A + HB+ + e−.The usefulness of the wedge scheme is demonstrated by its ability to explain the unusual electrochemistry of the phenylenediamine-based urea, U(H)H, which we have shown undergoes a self proton transfer upon oxidation to give half equivalent of the doubly oxidized quinoidal cation and half-equivalent of the electroinactive, protonated reduced urea, Scheme 2. The reaction gives chemically irreversible voltammetry in acetonitrile as would be expected given that the quinoidal cation is harder to reduce than the initially formed radical cation. However, it gives reversible voltammetry in methylene chloride, which can be explained by the greater stability of the H-bonded intermediate in this solvent. In addition, in methylene chloride, we are able to clearly observe a concentration and scan rate dependent conversion between two different reduction pathways on the return scan. This behavior cannot be explained by a simple square scheme, but is readily explained by the wedge scheme.In this presentation, we will report recent results on the voltammetry of U(H)H in the presence of guest molecules that H-bond to the starting, reduced state. We will show that their effect on the voltammetry can be explained in terms of two interlinked wedge schemes, one representing the electron transfer / H-bonding / proton transfer reactions of U(H)H with itself and the other representing the reactions with the added guest.
- Research Article
- 10.56042/ijca.v60i7.46223
- Sep 22, 2021
- Indian Journal of Chemistry -Section A
In aqueous perchloric acid medium (pH = 0.522 – 1.3) , N–benzylhydroxylamine ( two electron reductant) reduces the one electron oxidant, superoxo ligand in [(dien)(en)CoIII(O2)CoIII(en)(dien)](ClO4)5 (1) to the corresponding hydroperoxo complex, [(en)(dien)CoIII(HO2)CoIII(en)(dien)]5+ (2) and itself gets oxidised to PhCH2NO following both proton coupled electron transfer (PCET) path and an electron – transfer (ET) reaction. The kinetics, stoichiometry and reaction mechanism clearly indicate that oxidation of PhCH2NHOH occurs through the formation of an intermediate, benzyl derivative of aminoxyl radical (PhCH2NHO•). In the presence of excess PhCH2NHOH over 1, the reaction obeys first-order kinetics and rate of the reaction increases with [PhCH2NHOH]. The reaction rate, however, decreases with increase in [H+] and the plot of 1/ko with [H+] is linear with a small but noteworthy intercept. It is also remarked that the reaction rate remarkably decreases with increasing proportion of D2O replacing H2O in the solvent. Therefore, an H-atom transfer (HAT) from PhCH2NHOH to the bridging superoxide in 1 seems reasonable at the rate determining step.
- Research Article
8
- 10.1021/jz500396r
- Mar 28, 2014
- The journal of physical chemistry letters
Rigorous quantum dynamical study of concerted proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) on the time scale of a few femtoseconds (fs) has been rarely reported. Herein, a time-dependent quantum wavepacket propagation method was applied to the dynamics of the charge-transfer excited electronic state of FHCl corresponding to F(+)HCl(-). The dynamics corresponds to a bidirectional PCET with two dissociation channels: the electron transfer (ET, generating FH+Cl) and proton transfer (PT, generating F+HCl) paths. The calculated branching ratio (Cl/F), 0.78, implies a surprising fact: PT prevails over ET. A detailed analysis of the proton movement and electron readjustment suggests that the proton movement starts ∼3 fs earlier than the electron movement, and the electron readjustment is triggered by the initial movement of the proton. The branching ratio drastically inverts to 1.24 because of a reduced nonadiabatic effect in the isotope-substituted system, FDCl.
- Research Article
198
- 10.1021/ja068090g
- Apr 20, 2007
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
Proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET), a class of formal hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) reactions, is of widespread interest because it is implicated in a broad range of chemical and biochemical processes. PCET is typically differentiated from HAT by the fact that it occurs when a proton and electron are transferred between different sets of molecular orbitals. Previous theoretical work predicted that hydrogen bonding between reactants is a necessary but not sufficient condition for H exchanges to take place by PCET. This implies that HAT is the only mechanism for H exchange between two carbon atoms. In this work, we present computational results that show that the H exchange in the tert-butylperoxyl/phenol couple, a prototypical antioxidant exchange reaction, occurs by PCET and that the transfer of the electron can occur via an oxygen lone pair-ring pi overlap. We then show that the H exchange in a model for the tyrosyl/tyrosine couple, which is implicated in ribonucleotide reductase chemistry, occurs via PCET and that one path for the electron transfer is provided by a strong pi-stacking interaction. Finally, we show that a pi-stacking interaction in the benzyl/toluene couple, a system in which there is no H-bonding, can result in this exchange occurring via PCET to some extent. Collectively, these results indicate that PCET reactions are not unique to systems that can engage in H-bonding and that lone pair-pi and pi-pi interactions in these systems may be more important than previously understood.
- Research Article
17
- 10.1002/cphc.201900095
- Apr 29, 2019
- Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry
Although the mechanism for the transformation of carbon dioxide to formate with copper hydride is well understood, it is not clear how formic acid is ultimately released. Herein, we show how formic acid is formed in the decomposition of the copper formate clusters Cu(II)(HCOO)3 − and Cu(II)2(HCOO)5 −. Infrared irradiation resonant with the antisymmetric C−O stretching mode activates the cluster, resulting in the release of formic acid and carbon dioxide. For the binary cluster, electronic structure calculations indicate that CO2 is eliminated first, through hydride transfer from formate to copper. Formic acid is released via proton‐coupled electron transfer (PCET) to a second formate ligand, evidenced by close to zero partial charge and spin density at the hydrogen atom in the transition state. Concomitantly, the two copper centers are reduced from Cu(II) to Cu(I). Depending on the detailed situation, either PCET or hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) takes place.
- Research Article
41
- 10.1073/pnas.71.4.1408
- Apr 1, 1974
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Chromous ion reacts with ferricytochrome c to yield a one-to-one Cr(III)-ferrocytochrome c complex. This material, when hydrolyzed by trypsin and subjected to chromatographic procedures, yielded two fragments containing chromium. The amino-acid compositions and chemical characteristics of each of these fragments indicated that the chromium had crosslinked two segments of polypeptide chain; these were residues 40-53-Cr(III)-residues 61-72 and residues 40-53-Cr(III)-residues 61-73. Examination of a model of the ferricytochrome c molecule indicated that only two residues of the crosslinked peptides were sufficiently close to allow crosslinking to take place. These residues were tyrosine 67 and asparagine 52. Enzymatic hydrolysis of one of those fragments by aminopeptidase M supported this identification. The position of the chromic ion implies what is the path of electron transfer from the chromous ion to the ferric ion in this chemical reduction of cytochrome c, and suggests a possible path of electron transfer in biological oxidation-reduction reactions.
- Research Article
169
- 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.03.001
- Mar 12, 2010
- Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Integrating proton coupled electron transfer (PCET) and excited states
- Research Article
5
- 10.1021/jacs.0c04716
- Jul 15, 2020
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
Long-range electron transfer is coupled to proton transfer in a wide range of chemically and biologically important processes. Recently the proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) rate constants for a series of biomimetic oligoproline peptides linking Ru(bpy)32+ to tyrosine were shown to exhibit a substantially shallower dependence on the number of proline spacers compared to the analogous electron transfer (ET) systems. The experiments implicated a concerted PCET mechanism involving intramolecular electron transfer from tyrosine to Ru(bpy)33+ and proton transfer from tyrosine to a hydrogen phosphate dianion. Herein these PCET systems, as well as the analogous ET systems, are studied with microsecond molecular dynamics, and the ET and PCET rate constants are calculated with the corresponding nonadiabatic theories. The molecular dynamics simulations illustrate that smaller ET donor-acceptor distances are sampled by the PCET systems than by the analogous ET systems. The shallower dependence of the PCET rate constant on the ET donor-acceptor distance is explained in terms of an additional positive, distance-dependent electrostatic term in the PCET driving force, which attenuates the rate constant at smaller distances. This electrostatic term depends on the change in the electrostatic interaction between the charges on each end of the bridge and can be modified by altering these charges. On the basis of these insights, this theory predicted a less shallow distance dependence of the PCET rate constant when imidazole rather than hydrogen phosphate serves as the proton acceptor, even though their pKa values are similar. This theoretical prediction was subsequently validated experimentally, illustrating that long-range electron transfer processes can be tuned by modifying the nature of the proton acceptor in concerted PCET processes. This level of control has broad implications for the design of more effective charge-transfer systems.
- Research Article
211
- 10.1016/j.bbabio.2003.07.002
- Dec 31, 2003
- Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics
Thermodynamics and kinetics of proton-coupled electron transfer: stepwise vs. concerted pathways
- Research Article
34
- 10.1021/jp907808t
- Oct 1, 2009
- The journal of physical chemistry. B
The driving force dependence of the rate constants for nonadiabatic electron transfer (ET), proton transfer (PT), and proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions is examined. Inverted region behavior, where the rate constant decreases as the reaction becomes more exoergic (i.e., as DeltaG(0) becomes more negative), has been observed experimentally for ET and PT. This behavior was predicted theoretically for ET but is not well understood for PT and PCET. The objective of this Letter is to predict the experimental conditions that could lead to observation of inverted region behavior for PT and PCET. The driving force dependence of the rate constant is qualitatively different for PT and PCET than for ET because of the high proton vibrational frequency and substantial shift between the reactant and product proton vibrational wave functions. As a result, inverted region behavior is predicted to be experimentally inaccessible for PT and PCET if only the driving force is varied. This behavior may be observed for PT over a limited range of rates and driving forces if the solvent reorganization energy is low enough to cause observable oscillations. Moreover, this behavior may be observed for PT or PCET if the proton donor-acceptor distance increases as DeltaG(0) becomes more negative. Thus, a plausible explanation for experimentally observed inverted region behavior for PT or PCET is that varying the driving force also impacts other properties of the system, such as the proton donor-acceptor distance.
- Research Article
- 10.5958/0974-4150.2015.00093.0
- Jan 1, 2015
- Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry
Enzymes often rely on the coupling of electrons and protons to affect primary metabolic steps involving charge transport and catalysis. The present theoretical study is intend to explore the path of electron transfer from substrate to active site and to provide a plausible route of electron transfer in the enzymatic catalysis from 6-MP or hypoxanthine to active site. Density functional theory (DFT)/B3LYP method were used to probe the path of electron or proton transfer mechanism from Mullikan charge.
- Research Article
10
- 10.1021/jacs.2c09672
- Oct 31, 2022
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
The reorganization energy (λ) for interfacial electron transfer (ET) and proton-coupled ET (PCET) from a conductive metal oxide (In2O3:Sn, ITO) to a surface-bound water oxidation catalyst was extracted from kinetic data measured as a function of the thermodynamic driving force. Visible light excitation resulted in rapid excited-state injection (kinj > 108 s-1) to the ITO, which photo-initiated the two interfacial reactions of interest. The rate constants for both reactions increased with the driving force, -ΔG°, to a saturating limit, kmax, with rate constants consistently larger for ET than for PCET. Marcus-Gerischer analysis of the kinetic data provided the reorganization energy for interfacial PCET (0.90 ± 0.02 eV) and ET (0.40 ± 0.02 eV), respectively. The magnitude of kmax for PCET was found to decrease with pH, behavior that was absent for ET. Both the decrease in kmax and the larger reorganization energy for an unwanted competing PCET reaction from the ITO to the oxidized catalyst showcases a significant kinetic advantage for driving solar water oxidation at high pH. Computational analysis revealed a larger inner-sphere reorganization energy contribution for PCET than for ET arising from a more significant change in the Ru-O bond length for the PCET reaction. Extending the Marcus-Gerischer theory to PCET by including the excited electron-proton vibronic states and the proton donor-acceptor motion provided an apparent reorganization energy of 1.01 eV. This study demonstrates that the Marcus-Gerischer theory initially developed for ET can be reliably extended to PCET for quantifying and interpreting reorganization energies observed experimentally.
- Research Article
73
- 10.1021/ja0100524
- Mar 29, 2001
- Journal of the American Chemical Society
A comparative theoretical investigation of single electron transfer (ET), single proton transfer (PT), and proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions in iron bi-imidazoline complexes is presented. These calculations are motivated by experimental studies showing that the rates of ET and PCET are similar and are both slower than the rate of PT for these systems (Roth, J. P.; Lovel, S.; Mayer, J. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5486). The theoretical calculations are based on a multistate continuum theory, in which the solute is described by a multistate valence bond model, the transferring hydrogen nucleus is treated quantum mechanically, and the solvent is represented as a dielectric continuum. For electronically nonadiabatic electron transfer, the rate expressions for ET and PCET depend on the inner-sphere (solute) and outer-sphere (solvent) reorganization energies and on the electronic coupling, which is averaged over the reactant and product proton vibrational wave functions for PCET. The small overlap of the proton vibrational wave functions localized on opposite sides of the proton transfer interface decreases the coupling for PCET relative to ET. The theory accurately reproduces the experimentally measured rates and deuterium kinetic isotope effects for ET and PCET. The calculations indicate that the similarity of the rates for ET and PCET is due mainly to the compensation of the smaller outer-sphere solvent reorganization energy for PCET by the larger coupling for ET. The moderate kinetic isotope effect for PCET arises from the relatively short proton transfer distance. The PT reaction is found to be dominated by solute reorganization (with very small solvent reorganization energy) and to be electronically adiabatic, leading to a fundamentally different mechanism that accounts for the faster rate.
- Research Article
124
- 10.1021/bi00091a005
- Oct 12, 1993
- Biochemistry
The crystal structure of plastocyanin from the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii has been determined at 1.5-A resolution with a crystallographic R factor of 16.8%. Plastocyanin is a small (98 amino acids), blue copper-binding protein that catalyzes the transfer of electrons in oxygenic photosynthesis from cytochrome f in the quinol oxidase complex to P700+ in photosystem I. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii plastocyanin is an eight-stranded, antiparallel beta-barrel with a single copper atom coordinated in quasitetrahedral geometry by two imidazole nitrogens (from His-37 and His-87), a cysteine sulfur (from Cys-84), and a methionine sulfur (from Met-92). The molecule contains a region of negative charge surrounding Tyr-83 (the putative distant site of electron transfer) and an exclusively hydrophobic region surrounding His-87; these regions are thought to be involved in the recognition of reaction partners for the purpose of directing electron transfer. Chlamydomonas reinhardtii plastocyanin is similar to the other plastocyanins of known structure, particularly the green algal plastocyanins from Enteromorpha prolifera and Scenedesmus obliquus. A potential "through-bond" path of electron transfer has been identified in the protein that involves the side chain of Tyr-83, the main-chain atoms between residues 83 and 84, the side chain of Cys-84, the copper atom, and the side chain of His-87.
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.126154
- Nov 1, 2025
- Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125469
- Nov 1, 2025
- Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy
- New
- Research Article
1
- 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125452
- Nov 1, 2025
- Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125511
- Nov 1, 2025
- Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125509
- Nov 1, 2025
- Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125512
- Nov 1, 2025
- Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.126159
- Nov 1, 2025
- Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125514
- Nov 1, 2025
- Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125472
- Nov 1, 2025
- Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.apcatb.2025.125520
- Nov 1, 2025
- Applied Catalysis B: Environment and Energy
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.