Abstract

Phytophthora megakarya (Pmeg) and Phytophthora palmivora (Ppal) cause black pod rot of Theobroma cacao L. (cacao). Of these two clade 4 species, Pmeg is more virulent and is displacing Ppal in many cacao production areas in Africa. Symptoms and species specific sporangia production were compared when the two species were co-inoculated onto pod pieces in staggered 24 h time intervals. Pmeg sporangia were predominantly recovered from pod pieces with unwounded surfaces even when inoculated 24 h after Ppal. On wounded surfaces, sporangia of Ppal were predominantly recovered if the two species were simultaneously applied or Ppal was applied first but not if Pmeg was applied first. Pmeg demonstrated an advantage over Ppal when infecting un-wounded surfaces while Ppal had the advantage when infecting wounded surfaces. RNA-Seq was carried out on RNA isolated from control and Pmeg and Ppal infected pod pieces 3 days post inoculation to assess their abilities to alter/suppress cacao defense. Expression of 4,482 and 5,264 cacao genes was altered after Pmeg and Ppal infection, respectively, with most genes responding to both species. Neural network self-organizing map analyses separated the cacao RNA-Seq gene expression profiles into 24 classes, 6 of which were largely induced in response to infection. Using KEGG analysis, subsets of genes composing interrelated pathways leading to phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, ethylene and jasmonic acid biosynthesis and action, plant defense signal transduction, and endocytosis showed induction in response to infection. A large subset of genes encoding putative Pr-proteins also showed differential expression in response to infection. A subset of 36 cacao genes was used to validate the RNA-Seq expression data and compare infection induced gene expression patterns in leaves and wounded and unwounded pod husks. Expression patterns between RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR were generally reproducible. The level and timing of altered gene expression was influenced by the tissues studied and by wounding. Although, in these susceptible interactions gene expression patterns were similar, some genes did show differential expression in a Phytophthora species dependent manner. The biggest difference was the more intense changes in expression in Ppal inoculated wounded pod pieces further demonstrating its rapid progression when penetrating through wounds.

Highlights

  • Theobroma cacao L., the source of cocoa and a critical ingredient in chocolate, is grown around the world where favorable tropical environments occur

  • When zoospores of Phytophthora megakarya Brasier and Griffin (Pmeg) and Ppal were applied to unwounded surfaces of cacao pod husks, the disease development, as measured by area under disease progress curve (AUDPC), was dependent on the timing of the individual species isolate inoculated (Figure 1)

  • When the Ppal zoospores were simultaneously inoculated along with Pmeg zoospores, the observed disease reactions were that of Pmeg and Pmeg was most often recovered from the sporangia produced at 5 dpi

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Theobroma cacao L. (cacao), the source of cocoa and a critical ingredient in chocolate, is grown around the world where favorable tropical environments occur. Phytophthora megakarya Brasier and Griffin (Pmeg) occurs only in the countries of West and Central Africa and is considered a significant pathogen only on cacao. Pmeg and Ppal have estimated genome sizes of 126.88 and 151.23 Mb, respectively with 42,036 and 44,327 genes, respectively (Ali et al, in press). Ppal has gone through whole genome duplication and subsequent gene diversification has expanded its genetic capacity for nutrient acquisition and breakdown of complex structures, for example cell walls. This capacity may influence Ppal’s vigorous growth and broad host range, even without extended co-evolution with cacao. During Phytophthora infection, appressoria release effectors even before penetrations that enter host cells in an attempt to suppress PAMP (pathogenassociated molecular pattern)-triggered immunity (Giraldo and Valent, 2013)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.