Physicians' assessments of the utility of health states associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

Abstract

An understanding of quality of life (QOL) with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is important because the merits of prevention and treatment alternatives may depend substantially on how these interventions affect QOL. Physicians' views about QOL are important, because they influence the therapeutic options that physicians consider or offer, the recommendations that physicians make, and because they are important for the analysis of certain policy questions. We assessed physicians' utilities of health states associated with HIV infection, and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection; assessment of utilities for HBV was induced to provide a comparison with HIV utilities. We surveyed 200 housestaff and staff physicians in an academic medical centre by anonymous paper-based questionnaire and used the time-tradeoff method to assess physicians' utilities of the health states. On a scale in which 0 was equivalent to death, and 1 was equivalent to good health, the median utilities for asymptomatic HIV infection, symptomatic HIV infection, and AIDS were 0.833, 0.417, and 0.167, respectively (p < 0.01 or each two-way comparison). Median utilities for asymptomatic HBV infection, mildly symptomatic HBV infection, and severely symptomatic HBV infection were 0.917, 0.667, and 0.167, respectively (p < 0.01 for each two-way comparison). Although physicians varied substantially in the ratings of health states, they assessed the utility of life with HIV disease, including asymptomatic infection, as severely reduced. Studies of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of preventive and therapeutic interventions for HIV should evaluate the effect of the intervention on utility-based assessments of QOL. Studies that do not assess such effects may significantly underestimate or overestimate the value of these interventions, depending on the intervention's effect on QOL.