Physician attitudes and knowledge on prophylactic salpingectomy in perimenopausal patients

Abstract

PurposeEighty percent of the approximately 500,000 hysterectomies performed annually in the US are for benign indications. There is lack of consensus regarding concurrent removal of fallopian tubes and/or ovaries. Ovarian cancer risk reduction is the principal benefit but the adverse consequences of ovarian removal can include vasomotor disturbance, vaginal dryness, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, and cognitive decline. Emerging evidence on the role of fallopian tubes in ovarian carcinogenesis and the consequences of oophorectomy have led the American College of Obstetricians-Gynecologists (ACOG) to recommend bilateral salpingectomy with ovarian conservation during benign hysterectomy for women at population risk for ovarian cancer. MethodsFive hundred members of the ACOG Collaborative Ambulatory Research Network (CARN) were randomly selected to participate in this survey study. Results165 completed the survey (35.3% response rate). Most respondents reported that a family history of breast, ovarian or colon cancer and patient age influence their decision to offer salpingectomy more than 75% of the time. Factors that a majority of respondents reported discussing during counseling included possible ovarian cancer risk reduction, surgical menopause, severity of symptoms, and the effects on bone and cardiovascular health. The respondents mean score for the knowledge-based questions was only 1.7 (±0.92) out of 4 points. ConclusionSeveral factors may affect decision making for prophylactic salpingectomy at the time of hysterectomy however paramount among these is cancer risk reduction. Most physicians found it difficult to discuss and implement a change in care for patients with preconceived notions of ovarian preservation or removal.