Abstract

Tripterygium wilfordii (Celastraceae) is a traditional Chinese medicine; and the dried root and rhizome constitute the main officinal parts. Tripterygium wilfordii has been identified as a potential candidate for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, nephritis, asthma, leprosy, and cancer. The phylogenetic relationships within the Tripterygium genus are ambiguous; thus, our aim is to clarify the relationships within this genus using phylogeographic and phylogenetic analyses. Here, we first sequenced three plastid DNA regions (i.e., psbA‐trnH, rpl32‐trnL, and trnL‐trnF) and found that Tripterygium hypoglaucum and T. wilfordii were clustered together based on the strength of the topology in the phylogenetic analysis: T. hypoglaucum is polyphyletic, and T. wilfordii is paraphyletic. A spatial analysis of molecular variance showed that the best group value is 4, and the groups were almost consistent with the topology of in the phylogenetic analysis. The Mantel analyses of Tripterygium using IBD web showed statistically significant relationships between genetic and geographical distance distributions (r = .3479, p < .0001). The molecular dating using Fossil calibration indicated that the divergence in Tripterygium was approximately 8.13 Ma. Furthermore, we also analyzed four DNA regions (i.e., ITS2, psbA‐trnH, matK, and rbcL) that were obtained from the NCBI nucleotide database; these results showed that T. wilfordii and T. hypoglaucum clustered together, while Tripterygium regelii represented a separate cluster. Tripterygium hypoglaucum and T. wilfordii were never distinct lineages, and the species circumscriptions are artificial. We propose that T. wilfordii and T. hypoglaucum are conspecific, while T. regelii likely constitutes a separate species.

Highlights

  • Tripterygium wilfordii, which is a perennial woody vine member of the Celastraceae family that is native to eastern and southern China, Taiwan, Korea, and Japan, has been used as a traditional and allopathic Chinese herb for centuries (Brinker, Ma, Lipsky, & Raskin, 2007)

  • An RAPD marker (Liu, Guo, Huang, & Si, 2007) experiment was conducted to study the genetic relationships and diversity in the Tripterygium genus. These experiments showed that five T. regelii individuals gathered closely to form a single branch that was separated from the other populations, and that T. wilfordii and T. hypoglaucum could be combined into the same species

  • Further analyses using four DNA regions (i.e., ITS2, matK, rbcL, and psbA-trnH) for species identification in Tripterygium showed that T. regelii clustered alone, whereas T. hypoglaucum clustered with T. wilfordii, suggesting

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Tripterygium wilfordii, which is a perennial woody vine member of the Celastraceae family that is native to eastern and southern China, Taiwan, Korea, and Japan, has been used as a traditional and allopathic Chinese herb for centuries (Brinker, Ma, Lipsky, & Raskin, 2007). On the Tropicos site (http:// www.tropicos.org/Home.aspx), Tripterygium contains the following five species: T. bullockii Hance, T. forrestii Loes, T. hypoglaucum A content analysis of triptolide in different populations and individuals of Tripterygium suggested that triptolide in T. regelii was very low, and there was no significant difference between T. wilfordii and T. hypoglaucum (Huang, Guo, & Si, 2005). An RAPD marker (Liu, Guo, Huang, & Si, 2007) experiment was conducted to study the genetic relationships and diversity in the Tripterygium genus These experiments showed that five T. regelii individuals gathered closely to form a single branch that was separated from the other populations, and that T. wilfordii and T. hypoglaucum could be combined into the same species. Further analyses using four DNA regions (i.e., ITS2, matK, rbcL, and psbA-trnH) for species identification in Tripterygium showed that T. regelii clustered alone, whereas T. hypoglaucum clustered with T. wilfordii, suggesting. The molecular dating using Fossil calibration estimated that the divergence in Tripterygium was approximately 8.13 Ma

| MATERIALS AND METHODS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.