Abstract
The paper examines the legitimacy of the political authority towards the arguments of the philosophical anarchism. The majority of thinkers interpreted the notion of legitimization as the exclusive right of political authority to be obeyed and to be recognized, to impose duties and to demand their fulfillment, and to exercise the monopoly of legitimate use of physical force when needed. Regarding that definition, no political authority can be considered legitimate according to philosophical anarchism because citizens never have an obligation to obey every valid law that applies to them by the state. The proposed solution aims to demonstrate an adequate answer to philosophical anarchism’s objection.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
