Phenotype-guided approach for device-based therapies in heart failure.

Adherence to Guideline-Recommended Adjunctive Heart Failure Therapies Among Outpatient Cardiology Practices (Findings from IMPROVE HF)

Cardiac Autonomic Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Heart Failure

More than 4000 patients have been evaluated in randomized controlled trials of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). These studies have demonstrated that CRT with or without an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) consistently improves quality of life, functional status, exercise capacity, and cardiac structure and function and reduces morbidity and mortality in heart failure patients with ventricular dyssynchrony. The magnitude of benefit seen with CRT is comparable to or exceeds that seen with evidence-based drug therapies for heart failure but occurs in patients who are already receiving such medications. Thus, CRT has been added to the list of evidence-based therapies that make heart failure patients feel better and live longer (the Table). Consequently, a strong ethical mandate exists for the use of CRT in heart failure. This mandate is reflected in our current practice guidelines for the management of chronic heart failure, which state that all eligible patients should receive CRT unless contraindicated.1,2 End of debate! CRT should be a routine part of any evidence-based treatment regimen for heart failure. View this table: Major Benefits of Evidence-Based Heart Failure Therapies Of course, things are never quite so simple, so let us take a look at the evidence supporting this clinical mandate for CRT and address patient selection, some of the limitations of CRT, and some of the unanswered questions about the use of CRT in heart failure. None of this discussion will lessen the role of CRT in the treatment of heart failure; rather, it will guide the selection of appropriate patients and speculate on the future application of CRT to an even broader group of heart failure patients. Response by Greenberg and Mehra p 2698 Approximately one third of patients with systolic heart failure exhibit ventricular dyssynchrony, defined as a QRS duration >120 ms on the surface ECG.3,4 Ventricular dyssynchrony produces suboptimal ventricular …

Heart failure

International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Practice guidelines for management of heart failure in children

HFSA Scientific Statement: Update on Device Based Therapies in Heart Failure

Heart failure is a syndrome related to abnormal cardiac performance with a consequence of impaired cardiac output at rest or with exertion and/or congestion, which usually leads to symptoms of fatigue, dyspnea, and edema. The syndrome is characterized by various phenotypes related to a vast array of etiologies with diverse management targets. The current broad categorization of heart failure separates patients based on ejection fraction. Further description of the phenotype beyond ejection fraction is imperative to correctly identify the etiology of heart failure and, ultimately, to choose medical, device, and surgical therapies appropriately. This review covers the epidemiology of heart failure, defining the phenotype and etiology of heart failure, recognition and management of acute decompensated heart failure, management of chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction, management of heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction, and advanced heart failure. Figures show the evolution of therapy in chronic heart failure from the symptom-directed model, the complex pathophysiology and principal aberrations underlying heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and concepts underlying surgical therapy in advanced heart failure using Laplace’s law. Tables list various etiologies of heart failure; sensitivity and specificity of clinical, biomarker, and radiographic data in the diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure; drugs and devices with a demonstrated survival benefit in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction; neurohormonal antagonist dosing in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction; randomized, placebo-controlled trials in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction; categorization of heart failure according to American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology heart failure stage, New York Heart Association functional class, and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support level; and poor prognostic indicators in heart failure. This review contains 4 highly rendered figures, 8 tables, and 114 references.

Heart failure is a syndrome related to abnormal cardiac performance with a consequence of impaired cardiac output at rest or with exertion and/or congestion, which usually leads to symptoms of fatigue, dyspnea, and edema. The syndrome is characterized by various phenotypes related to a vast array of etiologies with diverse management targets. The current broad categorization of heart failure separates patients based on ejection fraction. Further description of the phenotype beyond ejection fraction is imperative to correctly identify the etiology of heart failure and, ultimately, to choose medical, device, and surgical therapies appropriately. This review covers the epidemiology of heart failure, defining the phenotype and etiology of heart failure, recognition and management of acute decompensated heart failure, management of chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction, management of heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction, and advanced heart failure. Figures show the evolution of therapy in chronic heart failure from the symptom-directed model, the complex pathophysiology and principal aberrations underlying heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and concepts underlying surgical therapy in advanced heart failure using Laplace’s law. Tables list various etiologies of heart failure; sensitivity and specificity of clinical, biomarker, and radiographic data in the diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure; drugs and devices with a demonstrated survival benefit in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction; neurohormonal antagonist dosing in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction; randomized, placebo-controlled trials in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction; categorization of heart failure according to American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology heart failure stage, New York Heart Association functional class, and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support level; and poor prognostic indicators in heart failure. This review contains 4 highly rendered figures, 8 tables, and 114 references.

Heart failure is a syndrome related to abnormal cardiac performance with a consequence of impaired cardiac output at rest or with exertion and/or congestion, which usually leads to symptoms of fatigue, dyspnea, and edema. The syndrome is characterized by various phenotypes related to a vast array of etiologies with diverse management targets. The current broad categorization of heart failure separates patients based on ejection fraction. Further description of the phenotype beyond ejection fraction is imperative to correctly identify the etiology of heart failure and, ultimately, to choose medical, device, and surgical therapies appropriately. This review covers the epidemiology of heart failure, defining the phenotype and etiology of heart failure, recognition and management of acute decompensated heart failure, management of chronic heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction, management of heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction, and advanced heart failure. Figures show the evolution of therapy in chronic heart failure from the symptom-directed model, the complex pathophysiology and principal aberrations underlying heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and concepts underlying surgical therapy in advanced heart failure using Laplace’s law. Tables list various etiologies of heart failure; sensitivity and specificity of clinical, biomarker, and radiographic data in the diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure; drugs and devices with a demonstrated survival benefit in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction; neurohormonal antagonist dosing in heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction; randomized, placebo-controlled trials in heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction; categorization of heart failure according to American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology heart failure stage, New York Heart Association functional class, and Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support level; and poor prognostic indicators in heart failure. This review contains 3 highly rendered figures, 7 tables, and 113 references.

Radiographic, ultrasound, nuclear, and magnetic resonance methods have become indispensable in the management of heart failure (HF). Imaging is widely used in decision making in HF, not only in relation to left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic function but also in the selection of medical, device, and surgical therapy in HF and valvular heart disease. Future developments in the care of advanced heart disease, including stem cell therapy, device therapy to control remodeling, and percutaneous valve interventions, as well as the need to identify subclinical heart disease, are likely to expand this use. Moreover, the epidemic of diabesity (diabetes and obesity) will augment the existing epidemic of HF just when it appeared to have peaked.1 Large numbers of patients will need information from imaging to guide clinical decision making (Table 1). The sources of this information will need to be expeditious, inexpensive, and preferably objective and quantitative.2 View this table: Table 1. Established HF: What the Clinician Needs Although some of the measurements in HF patients are structural (LV mass and geometry), the main components of an imaging assessment in HF will continue to be primarily functional (LV ejection fraction, size, filling pressures, filling characteristics, and right ventricular [RV] function). A number of new technologies will enhance the future accuracy and reliability of these measures. ### LV Volumes and Ejection Fraction Routine techniques (contrast ventriculography, 2D echocardiography) provide real-time imaging in standard imaging planes. The only traditional method that has escaped this limitation has been radionuclide ventriculography, in which the ejection fraction is calculated from scintigraphic counts, but this introduces the separate potential problems of attenuation and overlying chambers. #### Limitations of 2D Imaging Two-dimensional imaging approaches require expert acquisition and observers and have limited reliability in obtaining appropriate cut planes in sequential studies. The limitation of requiring imaging planes in the correct axis is particularly an issue for 2D echocardiography, which …

Disorders of the cardiac muscle or cardiomyopathies are a broad, yet collectively common, group of conditions. Despite the heterogeneous etiologies, mode of death from these conditions is remarkably similar - progressive decline in cardiac function leading to intractable heart failure (HF) and sustained ventricular arrhythmias resulting in sudden cardiac death (SCD). Nearly 50% of patients die within 5 years of a HF diagnosis.1 Indeed, in the United States, HF alone is thought to cause 55,000 deaths per year2 and further contribute to 1 in 9 deaths overall.1 However, while advanced HF and the risk of SCD were once thought to be untreatable, technological advances has seen the emergence of device therapies as viable treatment options. Specifically, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy for treatment of ventricular arrhythmias, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for restoring cardiac synchrony and mechanical efficiency, and ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy to temporarily or permanently replace the function of the failing heart, have all emerged as highly efficacious therapies. The expanding use of device therapies, however, poses many challenges. First, while the indications for these devices are well summarized in clinical guidelines,3,4 considerable hurdles remain in ensuring eligible patients receive these therapies.5 By the same token, establishing the safety and effectiveness of these therapies in populations that are found in clinical practice, yet commonly excluded from trials, such as the elderly6 and uncommon forms of cardiomyopathies,7 is a high priority. Second, rapid dissemination of technologies frequently results in disparities in care. Indeed, age, gender, and racial disparities, in both receipt of these devices and outcomes following implantation, have been well documented. Whether these disparities have persisted, and the potential causative mechanisms underlying these disparities, however, are uncertain.8,9 Third, these devices are not without significant untoward effects; understanding …

Metabolic assessment of exercise in chronic heart failure patients treated with short-term vasodilators.

In contrast to systolic heart failure (SHF), for which knowledge of pathophysiology and therapy has advanced rapidly over the past decade, little is known about diastolic heart failure (DHF). The article by van Heerebeek et al1 in this issue of Circulation that describes an abnormal distribution of titin isoforms in DHF may herald a new approach to understanding the pathophysiology of this syndrome. Article p 1966 Recognition of 2 forms of heart failure is not new; almost 70 years ago, Fishberg2 described “those forms of cardiac insufficiency which are due to inadequate diastolic filling of the heart (hypodiastolic failure) [and] the far more common ones in which the heart fills adequately but does not empty to the normal extent (hyposystolic failure)” (p 23). This distinction has stood the test of time, because there is a growing consensus that these 2 clinical syndromes differ in epidemiology, demographics, and origin. Because DHF and SHF represent subgroups of patients with heart failure, they share many clinical features, notably the hemodynamic findings, but it is now clear that they are caused by different pathophysiological mechanisms. Hearts in SHF are characterized by eccentric hypertrophy, progressive left ventricular (LV) dilation, and abnormal LV systolic properties, whereas in DHF, the hearts generally exhibit concentric hypertrophy, normal or reduced LV volume, concentric remodeling, and abnormal diastolic function.3,4 In addition, cardiomyocyte size, shape, and molecular composition differ in these 2 syndromes. Diastolic dysfunction refers to mechanical and functional abnormalities present during relaxation and filling, whereas DHF refers to clinical syndromes in which patients with heart failure have little or no ventricular dilatation and significant, often dominant diastolic dysfunction. Diastolic dysfunction can be quantified with indices of LV pressure decline and filling. Abnormal pressure decline is characterized by decreased peak −dP/dt, prolonged isovolumic time constant (τ), and …

Pulmonary artery pressure-based telemedicine in heart failure: ready for Europe?

His bundle pacing improves left ventricular diastolic function in patients with heart failure with preserved systolic function