Abstract
This essay presents a critical analysis of the constitution of the “I” and the “other” as these are found in two of Kiekegaard’s most important texts, Works of Love , published in 1847, and Sickness unto Death , published in 1849. It particularly elucidates, with regard to the concepts of “I” and “other”, the nature of Kierkegaard’s discourse, which is based on a phenomenological strategy of reduplication that renders impossible every definition of the phenomena that departs from a positive stipulation of a conceptual identity. Hence, once one finds the presupposition of this strategy, that is to say, once one clarifies the essential features of the typically Christian phenomena, then it becomes possible to outline the faults and aporias advanced by Kierkegaard regarding the constitution of the subject or “I” and the relation between this “I” and the “other”. These faults or indeterminacies, which are the main topic of this essay, in their turn, seem to jeopardize not only a possible social theory – which Works of Love intends to develop – but, more fundamentally, the whole of Kierkegaard’s ethical project itself. Key words: I, other, reduplication, constitution of the subject, ethics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.