Abstract
The aim of this study was pharmacoeconomic evaluation of treatment with reslizumab compared to omalizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma. Methods. The study was based on indirect comparison between omalizumab and reslizumab in patients with severe asthma using published data. Costs of treatment with omalizumab, reslizumab, combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists (ICS/LABA), outpatient treatment, treatment of exacerbations and adverse events were also compared. Cost-efficacy analysis and budget impact analysis were used. Results. According to results of cost-efficacy analysis, therapy with reslizumab dominated over therapy with omalizumab in patients with severe asthma in term of rate of exacerbations requiring treatment with systemic steroids. According to results of budget impact analysis, switching of 100 patients from omalizumab to reslizumab could save RUB 51.99 million per a year that corresponds to 36.6% reduction in general direct costs for treatment of severe asthma. Conclusion. The results of this study demonstrated economic advantage of reslizumab over omalizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
