Abstract

pH has been recognized as one of the key environmental parameters with significant impacts on the nitrogen cycle in the environment. In this study, the effects of pH on NO3–/NO2– fate and N2O emission were examined with Shewanella loihica strain PV-4, an organism with complete denitrification and respiratory ammonification pathways. Strain PV-4 was incubated at varying pH with lactate as the electron donor and NO3–/NO2– and N2O as the electron acceptors. When incubated with NO3– and N2O at pH 6.0, transient accumulation of N2O was observed and no significant NH4+ production was observed. At pH 7.0 and 8.0, strain PV-4 served as a N2O sink, as N2O concentration decreased consistently without accumulation. Respiratory ammonification was upregulated in the experiments performed at these higher pH values. When NO2– was used in place of NO3–, neither growth nor NO2– reduction was observed at pH 6.0. NH4+ was the exclusive product from NO2– reduction at both pH 7.0 and 8.0 and neither production nor consumption of N2O was observed, suggesting that NO2– regulation superseded pH effects on the nitrogen-oxide dissimilation reactions. When NO3– was the electron acceptor, nirK transcription was significantly upregulated upon cultivation at pH 6.0, while nrfA transcription was significantly upregulated at pH 8.0. The highest level of nosZ transcription was observed at pH 6.0 and the lowest at pH 8.0. With NO2– as the electron acceptor, transcription profiles of nirK, nrfA, and nosZ were statistically indistinguishable between pH 7.0 and 8.0. The transcriptions of nirK and nosZ were severely downregulated regardless of pH. These observations suggested that the kinetic imbalance between N2O production and consumption, but neither decrease in expression nor activity of NosZ, was the major cause of N2O accumulation at pH 6.0. The findings also suggest that simultaneous enhancement of nitrogen retention and N2O emission reduction may be feasible through pH modulation, but only in environments where C:N or NO2–:NO3– ratio does not exhibit overarching control over the NO3–/NO2– reduction pathways.

Highlights

  • Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas ∼300 times more effective than CO2 in causing radiative forcing if present at the same concentration (Lashof and Ahuja, 1990)

  • Effects of pH on the NO3− Reduction Pathways and N2O Fate during NO3− Reduction pH conditions determined whether S. loihica strain PV-4 reduced NO3− to NH4+ or to N2 via N2O and whether the batch system functioned as a sink or a source of N2O during NO3− reduction (Figure 1)

  • The experiments performed with S. loihica strain PV-4 with NO3− and N2O as electron acceptors confirmed the previous finding that pH is a significant environmental parameter that regulate nitrogen-oxide dissimilation reactions. pH was previously suggested as one of the environmental parameters that determine the fate of NO3− in axenic cultures of S. loihica strain PV-4 and in complex mixed cultures (Stevens et al, 1998; Yoon et al, 2015a)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a potent greenhouse gas ∼300 times more effective than CO2 in causing radiative forcing if present at the same concentration (Lashof and Ahuja, 1990). The increase in the atmospheric concentration of N2O is strongly correlated to the increase in the global input of nitrogen fertilizers to agricultural soils (Kroeze et al, 1999; Davidson, 2009). Recent advances in microbial ecology have identified the environmental parameters that control the competition between denitrification and respiratory ammonification through experiments using axenic cultures or enrichment cultures (Kraft et al, 2014; van den Berg et al, 2015; Yoon et al, 2015a,b). In chemostat experiments with Shewanella loihica strain PV-4, electron acceptor limitation due to the high C:N ratio of the feed medium favored the dominance of respiratory ammonification over denitrification (Yoon et al, 2015a). Contrasting observations were reported, NO2−:NO3− ratios factored into selection of the NO3−/NO2− reduction pathways in two independent experiments carried out by different research groups (Kraft et al, 2014; Yoon et al, 2015b)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.