Abstract
To preserve confidential information for numeric and character data, there are corresponding to differential privacy mechanisms. However, current work without uniform evaluation criterion for these differential privacy mechanisms, because the data types are different. In this paper, we proposed privacy-preserving monotonicity principle as an evaluation criterion of differential privacy mechanisms. Firstly, this paper summarized three perturbation paradigms of existing work, including the linear perturbation, non-linear perturbation, and randomized perturbation. Secondly, for numeric and character data, we proposed privacy-preserving monotonicity principle of differential privacy based on computational indistinguishability, respectively. Finally, through analysis privacy-preserving monotonicity of existing perturbation methods for each perturbation paradigm, we presented constrained perturbation paradigms for numeric and character data that can achieve privacy-preserving monotonicity. Therefore, our privacy-preserving monotonicity principle shows the tradeoff between privacy and utility, and it can be regarded as an evaluation criterion of differential privacy mechanisms. Furthermore, we show that constrained perturbation paradigms of maintaining privacy-preserving monotonicity provide a useful guideline for differential privacy development.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.