Abstract
This research is part of a large-scale project aimed at creating a factor model of creative leadership potential. The present article features the effect of major and gender of students on their creative leadership potential. The authors identified groups of variables that characterize creative leadership potential. The study was based on the holodynamic and trans-communicative paradigm. The following range of scientific methods made it possible to determine the characteristics of creative leadership potential: the method of modeling communicative worlds, the method of psychosemantic graph, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, sociability scale profile, and social network analysis. The study involved 189 students of humanities (101) and science (88). The results showed the specificity of personal creative characteristics and parameters of the communicative world of the participants. Gender proved insignificant for future research. Students that majored in humanities appeared both more original and more conformal. They tended to find unusual negative points in positive topics and problems. Science students worked better with specific information and facts. They were good at evaluating alternatives and planning.
Highlights
This research is part of a large-scale project aimed at creating a factor model of creative leadership potential
The present article features the effect of major and gender of students on their creative leadership potential
The following range of scientific methods made it possible to determine the characteristics of creative leadership potential: the method of modeling communicative worlds, the method of psychosemantic graph, Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, sociability scale profile, and social network analysis
Summary
По методике SNA различия были обнаружены по большинству изучаемых шкал: In-Degree, Out-Degree, Closeness Centrality, Eigenvector Centrality. Студенты гуманитарных специальностей поддерживают больше социальных контактов внутри своей группы (различия по шкалам In-Degree и Out-Degree), а это может вести к более развитой социальной сети (выражено на шкалах Closeness Centrality и Eigenvector Centrality). Различия по шкалам Closeness Centrality и Eigenvector Centrality могут свидетельствовать о том, что студенты гуманитарных специальностей склонны выстраивать тесные и глубокие взаимосвязи, в результате которых проще занимать лидерские позиции и контактировать с другими лидерами. Более высокие значения у студентов гуманитарных направлений могут свидетельствовать о склонности к рефлексии, которая порождает большее количество тем и позволяет оценивать их и своих партнеров более ясно и насыщенно. Повышенные значения социальных контактов у студентов гуманитарных направлений неизбежно ведут к столкновению образов различных партнеров внутри личности, что порождает возможность более детального, разнообразного и насыщенного описания партнеров. Differences in the scales of In-Degree and Out-Degree (SNA method)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
