Periprocedural Cardiac Enzyme Elevation Predicts Adverse Outcomes

Purpose: We designed a prospective randomized, double blind study to assess whether pretreatment with cilostazol and rosuvastatin combination before elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) could reduce Periprocedural Myonecrosis (PPMN). Methods: A total of 172 patients with stable angina scheduled for elective PCI were randomly assigned to pretreatment with Cilostazol 200 mg and Rosuvastatin 40mg (group 1) or to pretreatment with Rosuvastatin 40mg group (group 2). Cardiac Troponin I (cTnI) levels were measured at baseline and at 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after PCI. The primary end-point was the occurrence of PPMN defined as any cTnI elevation above the Upper Normal Limit (UNL). The occurrence of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction (PPMI), defined as a postprocedural increase in cTnI level ≥5 times above the UNL. Results: There was no difference in baseline characteristics between the group 1 (n=86) and the group 2 (n=86). The incidence of PPMN was similar between the group 1 (21%) and the group 2 (24%, p=0.58). The rate of PPMI was also similar between the two groups (2.3% versus 7%, p=0.27). Subgroup analysis performed to the patients without chronic statin therapy before PCI (53 patients in group 1 and 50 patients in group 2) and showed that the incidence of PPMN was significantly lower in the group 1 (group 1:17% versus group 2:34%; p=0.04), but the rate of PPMI was similar between the groups (1.9% versus 10%; p=0.07). There was no significant difference in terms of the rate of adverse events during 1 month follow-up. Conclusion: This trial demonstrated that adjunctive cilostazol to rosuvastain pretreatment might not significantly reduce PPMN after elective PCI in patients with stable angina. However adjunctive cilostazol pretreatment could reduce PPMN in patients without chronic statin therapy before elective PCI.

n more than 20 years since the first percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures, the field of interventional cardiology has proliferated beyond all expectations. Now more than 1 million procedures are performed worldwide each year. Stenting has revolutionized the field, which previously relied on balloon dilatation in the majority of patients. With 50% of patients now undergoing stent implantation, the groundwork is laid for further important advances. In this article, we discuss the 4 most important new advances in the field of interventional cardiology: platelet inhibition, prevention of restenosis, stent evolution, and angiogenesis.

Background Dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor is the standard of care in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The optimal timing of the administration of oral P2Y12 inhibitors has been largely debated, particularly among patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). The latest European Society of Cardiology guidelines, based on recent scientific evidence, do not recommend routine pre-treatment with a P2Y12 inhibitor before coronary angiography. However, the impact of pre-treatment on the incidence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI) and myocardial injury has never been explored. Purpose To evaluate the impact of pre-treatment with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor on periprocedural myocardial infarction and injury in NSTEMI patients undergoing invasive treatment. Methods We evaluated all consecutive patients admitted to our coronary care unit from 2016 to 2021 affected by NSTEMI undergoing invasive management with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We enrolled only patients with stable (≤ 20% variation) or falling pre-procedure baseline cardiac troponin (cTn) values. The entire population was divided into two groups: patients pre-treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (an oral P2Y12 inhibitor in adjunct to aspirin) before performing coronary angiography (upstream group) and patients who started an oral P2Y12 inhibitor only after PCI (downstream group). All patients received aspirin and anticoagulant therapy before coronary angiography. The primary endpoint was the incidence rate of periprocedural MI and myocardial injury according to the fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. Finally, a safety endpoint of major and minor bleeding according to Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) criteria was evaluated for all bleeding episodes during hospitalization. Results A total of 878 patients with NSTEMI undergoing PCI and with pre-procedure stable cTn levels were analyzed: 615 (70%) constituted the upstream group. The mean age of the study population was 70.1±12.5 years and 71.3% were males. There were no significant differences regarding traditional cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, cTn and hemoglobin levels between the two groups. After PCI, the rate of periprocedural myocardial injury and MI did not significantly differ between the upstream and downstream groups (19.5% vs 24.7%, p=0.08 and 17.6% vs 19.4%, p=0.5, respectively). A trend of lower periprocedural myocardial injury and MI cumulative incidence was observed in the upstream group (37.1% vs 44.1%, p=0.051). Notably, major and minor bleedings during hospitalization occurred more frequently in the upstream group compared to the downstream one (5.2% vs 1.9%, p=0.02). Conclusions Among NSTEMI patients undergoing invasive management and with stable pre-procedure cTn levels, pretreatment with an oral P2Y12 inhibitor did not reduce the rate of periprocedural MI and myocardial injury but was associated with an increase in major and minor bleeding complications during hospitalization.

Novel Approaches for Preventing or Limiting Events (Naples) II Trial: Impact of a Single High Loading Dose of Atorvastatin on Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction

Although platelets lack nuclei and are the smallest circulating human cells, they play an integral and complex role in the process of thrombosis, both physiological and pathophysiological. Activation and aggregation of platelets play a central role in the propagation of intracoronary thrombi after (1) spontaneous atherosclerotic plaque disruption that results in myocardial ischemia or infarction in the acute coronary syndromes (ACS), or (2) the mechanical disruption that results from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Platelets initially adhere to collagen and von Willebrand factor at the site of the disrupted plaque, resulting in an initial platelet monolayer. After activation, platelets release secondary agonists such as thromboxane A2 and adenosine diphosphate (ADP), which in combination with thrombin generated by the coagulation cascade result in stimulation and recruitment of additional platelets.1,2 With this pathophysiological background, it is not surprising that antiplatelet therapy is a cornerstone of the management of patients with ACS, especially those undergoing PCI.3–5 See p 3171 Aspirin inhibits cyclooxygenase (COX) by irreversible acetylation, which prevents the production of thromboxane A2. The antithrombotic effect of aspirin results from the decreased production of this prothrombotic, vasoconstrictive substance. Aspirin is effective in the short- and long-term prevention of adverse vascular events in high-risk patient groups, including those with ACS, stroke and peripheral arterial disease.6 Aspirin also has been shown to reduce the frequency of ischemic complications after PCI.7,8 Despite the impressive and consistent effects of aspirin in reducing adverse events in a variety of ischemic heart disease states, a significant rate of such events persists, and more potent antiplatelet agents, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and thienopyridines have been developed. The thienopyridines irreversibly inhibit ADP binding to the P2Y12 receptor on the platelet surface. By blocking this receptor, these agents interfere with platelet activation, degranulation, and—by inhibiting the …

<i>Circulation</i> Editors’ Picks

Objectives: To test if the time of day significantly influences the occurrence of type 4A myocardial infarction in elective patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Background: Recent studies have suggested an influence of circadian rhythms on myocardial infarction size and mortality among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The aim of the study is to investigate whether periprocedural myocardial infarction (PMI) is influenced by the time of day in elective patients undergoing PCI.Methods: All consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI between 2007 and 2011 at our institutions with known post-interventional troponin were retrospectively included. Patients (n = 1021) were divided into two groups according to the starting time of the PCI: the morning group (n = 651) between 07:00 and 11:59, and the afternoon group (n = 370) between 12:00 and 18:59. Baseline and procedural characteristics as well as clinical outcome defined as the occurrence of PMI were compared between groups. In order to limit selection bias, all analyses were equally performed in 308 pairs using propensity score (PS) matching.Results: In the overall population, the rate of PMI was statistically lower in the morning group compared to the afternoon group (20% vs. 30%, p < 0.001). This difference remained statistically significant after PS-matching (21% vs. 29%, p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis shows that being treated in the afternoon independently increases the risk for PMI with an odds ratio of 2.0 (95%CI: 1.1–3.4; p = 0.02).Conclusions: This observational PS-matched study suggests that the timing of an elective PCI influences the rate of PMI.

Background Several definitions of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI) requiring different biomarker thresholds with or without ancillary criteria for myocardial ischemia are currently recommended without being fully validated in real-world patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Objectives We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin-based peri-procedural MI according to contemporary MI definitions using a large real-world PCI cohort. Methods In CCS patients undergoing elective PCI enrolled to the Bern PCI registry (NCT02241291) between 2010 and 2018, peri-procedural myocardial injury and infarction were assessed according to the 4th and 3rd universal definition of MI (UDMI), academic research consortium (ARC)-2, and Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) criteria. The primary endpoint was cardiac death at 1 year. Results Among 4404 CCS patients, peri-procedural MI defined by the 4th UDMI, 3rd UDMI, ARC-2, and SCAI were observed in 14.9%, 18.0%, 2.0%, and 2.0% of patients, respectively. Cardiac mortality at 1 year in patients with peri-procedural MI defined by 4th UDMI, 3rd UDMI, ARC-2, and SCAI were 3.0%, 2.9%, 5.8%, and 10.0%, respectively. After multivariate adjustments, peri-procedural MI defined by the ARC-2 and SCAI were independently associated with cardiac death at 1 year, while those defined by the 4th and 3rd UDMI were not. Conclusion Among CCS patients undergoing PCI, periprocedural MIs defined by theARC-2 and SCAI occurred 7 to 9 times less frequently as compared with the 4th and 3rd UDMI, and were the only definitions significantly associated with cardiac mortality. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Cardiac death at 1 year

Limited data are available on the risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction (MI) in patients undergoing complex versus noncomplex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We assessed the risk of periprocedural MI according to the fourth Universal definition of myocardial infarction (UDMI) and several other criteria among patients undergoing elective PCI in a prospective, single-center registry. Complex PCI included at least one of the following: 3 coronary vessels treated, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, total stent length >60 mm, treatment of chronic total occlusion, and use of rotational atherectomy. Between 2017 and 2021, we included 1010 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, of whom 226 underwent complex PCI (22.4%). The rate of periprocedural MI according to the fourth UDMI was significantly higher in complex compared to noncomplex PCI patients (26.5% vs. 14.5%, p < 0.001). Additionally, periprocedural MI was higher in the complex PCI group using SCAI (4% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.009), ARC-2 (13.7% vs. 8.0%, p = 0.013), ISCHEMIA (5.8% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.002), and EXCEL criteria (4.9% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.032). SYNTAX periprocedural MI occurred at low rates in both groups (0.9% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.657). Complex PCI was an independent predictor of the fourth UDMI periprocedural MI (odds ratio [OR] 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-2.27, p = 0.031). In patients with chronic coronary syndrome undergoing elective PCI, complex PCI is associated with a significantly higher risk of periprocedural MI using multiple definitions. These findings highlight the importance of considering upfront this risk in the planning of complex PCI procedures.

Relation of Aspirin Resistance to Coronary Flow Reserve in Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Purpose This review intends to illustrate basic principles on how to apply the Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI) for the diagnosis of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI) after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in clinical practice. Methods and Results Review of routine case-based events. Increases in cardiac troponin (cTn) concentrations are common after elective PCI in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). Peri-procedural PCI-related MI (type 4a MI) in CCS patients should be diagnosed in cases of major peri-procedural acute myocardial injury indicated by an increase in cTn concentrations of >5-times the 99th percentile upper reference limit (URL) together with evidence of new peri-procedural myocardial ischemia as demonstrated by electrocardiography (ECG), imaging, or flow-limiting peri-procedural complications in coronary angiography. Measurement of cTn baseline concentrations before elective PCI is useful. In patients presenting with acute MI undergoing PCI, peri-procedural increases in cTn concentrations are usually due to their index presentation and not PCI-related, apart from obvious major peri-procedural complications, such as persistent occlusion of a large side branch or no-reflow after stent implantation. Conclusion The distinction between type 4a MI, PCI-related acute myocardial injury, and chronic myocardial injury can be challenging in individuals undergoing PCI. Careful integration of all available clinical data is essential for correct classification.

Differential Rates and Clinical Significance of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction After Stenting or Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease According to Various Definitions

Is There Long-Term Clinical Equipoise Between CABG and PCI for Isolated Left Anterior Descending Artery Disease?

Evaluation of Intracoronary Adenosine to Prevent Periprocedural Myonecrosis in Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (From the PREVENT-ICARUS Trial)

The aim of our study was to assess the effect of pretreatment with cilostazol and rosuvastatin combination before elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on peri-procedural myocardial injury (PPMIJ). We randomly assigned 172 patients with stable angina pectoris scheduled for elective PCI to pre- treatment with Cilostazol 200mg and Rosuvastatin 40 mg (group 1), or to pretreatment with Rosuvastatin 40 mg group (group 2). The primary end-point was the occurrence of PPMIJ defined as any cardiac troponin I (Tn I) level elevated above the upper normal limit (UNL). The occurrence of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (PPMIN) was defined as a post-procedural increase in cTnI level ≥ 5 times above the UNL. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics between group 1 (n = 86) and group 2 (n = 86). The rate of PPMIJ (21% vs. 24%, p = 0.58) and PPMIN (2.3% vs. 7%, p = 0.27) were similar between the two study groups. Subgroup analysis performed on those patients without statin therapy before PCI (53 patients in group 1 and 50 patients in group 2) showed that the incidence of PPMIJ was significantly lower in the group 1 patients without chronic statin treatment [17% (9/53) versus 34% (17/50); p = 0.04], but the rate of PPMIN was similar between the two groups for those patients without chronic statin treatment [1.9% (1/53) versus 10% (5/50); p = 0.07]. We found that adjunct cilostazol and rosuvastatin pre-treatment did not significantly reduce PPMIJ after elective PCI in patients with stable angina pectoris. However, adjunct cilostazol pre-treatment could reduce PPMIJ in patients without chronic statin therapy before elective PCI. Cilostazol; Myocardial injury; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Statin.