Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is uncommon in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) among patients undergoing coronary angiography. Periprocedural CS is more frequent in high-risk patients and in technically demanding procedures. To describe the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pVA-ECMO) for CS associated with interventional cardiology procedures. Review of clinical records of seven patients treated between January 2014 and October 2018. pVA-ECMO was implanted within 6 hours of the interventional cardiology procedure. All patients had coronary artery disease and one of them also had symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. One patient entered the CCL in cardiac arrest. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was performed in all patients; four patients underwent an emergency procedure and five patients experienced PCI complications. One patient undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement suffered acute severe aortic regurgitation. An intra-aortic balloon pump was inserted at the CCL in five patients. Six patients experienced cardiac arrest. Mean SAVE score was -4.3 and baseline lactate 55 mg/dl. pVA-ECMO mean duration was 5 ± 4 days. Survival after both hospital discharge and 12 months of follow-up was 85.7% Regarding vascular access complications, we observed one access site hematoma and one episode of cannulation site bleeding requiring surgical repair. pVA-ECMO should be considered in patients with periprocedural CS as a bridge to recovery. Its use was associated with improved clinical outcomes in this series.

Highlights

  • Cardiogenic shock (CS) is uncommon in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL), with an incidence of 0.24%-0.47% among patients undergoing coronary angiography[1,2]

  • Observational studies reveal an incidence of 3.5%4.3% in patients with acute coronary syndromes[3,4], and a periprocedural CS incidence of 1.6% has been reported in intermediate-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)[5]

  • One patient entered the CCL in cardiac arrest (SCAI EA); six patients (85.7%) were at risk for CS (SCAI A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is uncommon in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL), with an incidence of 0.24%-0.47% among patients undergoing coronary angiography[1,2]. Periprocedural CS is more frequent in high-risk patients due to baseline cardiovascular disease and the technically-demanding procedures performed. Consensus statements suggest that short-term MCS may be considered in patients experiencing periprocedural CS8,9. Cardiogenic shock (CS) is uncommon in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) among patients undergoing coronary angiography. Periprocedural CS is more frequent in high-risk patients and in technically demanding procedures. Aim: To describe the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent peripheral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pVA-ECMO) for CS associated with interventional cardiology procedures. Conclusions: pVA-ECMO should be considered in patients with periprocedural CS as a bridge to recovery. Its use was associated with improved clinical outcomes in this series

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.