Perinatal mental health beyond rhetoric: need for a global transformative response

Addressing Maternal Mental Health: Progress, Challenges, and Potential Solutions

Perinatal mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic.

THE BURGEONING BURDEN OF PERINATAL MENTAL HEALTH IN LOWER MIDDLE-INCOME COUNTRIES

Finding a Medical Home for Perinatal Depression: How Can We Bridge the Postpartum Gap?

BackgroundThe perinatal period is a crucial time for women, as they experience various biological, psychological, and social stressors. Due to the complexity of this vulnerable time, there is a high prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders among pregnant women. In 2019, the Health Commission of Shenzhen initiated perinatal mental health screening programme in China. However, attitudes and perceptions of medical staff towards implementing mental health screening programme during pregnancy remain unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the perceptions and attitudes of obstetric staff and midwives towards screening for perinatal mental disorders in pregnant women, and identify their perceived needs and motivations for undertaking this task.MethodsThis is a qualitative exploratory study. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. The dataset was analysed using inductive content analysis. Purposive sampling method was used to recruit 13 participants at a tertiary maternal hospital in Shenzhen from September to November, 2019.ResultsA total of 13 obstetric staff was interviewed, including two obstetricians, three midwives, and eight nurses. Four themes were identified from this study: views on perinatal mental health disorders screening, competency in identifying and supporting high-risk groups, barriers to dealing with psychological problems during pregnancy, and the support needs of medical staff in undertaking the tasks of mental health disorders screening.ConclusionMedical staff lacked sufficient knowledge and skills in perinatal psychological health and were not well prepared for the task of screening pregnant women for mental health disorders. To address this issue, medical organisations and relevant government sectors should provide training to medical staff on perinatal mental health disorders, enhance public awareness of perinatal mental health disorders, establish a model of multidisciplinary collaboration for the screening of women’s perinatal mental disorders, and provide continuous and holistic care for pregnant women.

Although perinatal mental disorders are the most common health complication among women in the perinatal period, there is a huge gap in the implementation of related research findings in the health care system. We mapped the state of perinatal mental health (PMH) care in the WHO Europe region with aim to identify leading countries, which can serve as models for countries with less developed perinatal mental health care. Guidelines, policies, and documents related to screening and treatment services for PMH were searched as grey literature. Results were analysed to assess the status of PMH care in the WHO European countries and to identify gaps (absence of relevant service or documents). The state of perinatal mental health care was scored on a 0-5 scale. The grey literature search resulted in a total of 361 websites. Seven countries (Belgium, Finland, Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, UK, Malta) received full points for the presence of relevant PMH services or documents, while five countries received zero points. Most WHO European countries (48/53) have general mental health policies, but only 25 countries have policies specifically on perinatal mental health. Ten countries offer PMH screening, and 11 countries offer PMH service (of any type). Any PMH guidelines were provided in 23/53 countries. Perinatal mental health care is in its infancy in most WHO European countries. Leading countries (Belgium, Finland, Ireland, Netherlands, Sweden, UK, Malta) in PMH care can serve as conceptual models for those less developed and geopolitically close.

Perinatal mental health disorders are a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality in childbearing women. The World Health Organization recommends all women be screened for mental health disorders postnatally and have diagnostic and management services available. There are, however, currently no global indicators in use which measure the status and progress of perinatal mental health. The aim of this scoping review was to identify existing perinatal mental health indicators and propose a core set which could be used at a global level. We used the Global Perinatal Mental Health Theory of Change as the conceptual framework. We found 25 indicators for PMH aligned with the Global Perinatal Mental Health Theory of Change, which were condensed to form a core set of nine indicators These core indicators include the proportion of women with depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis, or adjustment disorders in the perinatal period; the proportion of women screened for these services; the proportion who have access to services following a positive diagnosis; and, the proportion of healthcare providers trained to provide mental health care. This review forms part of the foundational work for the development of a global monitoring framework which would be able to monitor progress towards the provision of universal high quality perinatal mental health care.

There are one billion migrants globally, of whom 82 million are forced migrants. Pregnant migrants face pre-migration stressors such as conflict, transit stressors including poverty, and post-migration stressors including navigating the immigration system; these stressors can make them vulnerable to mental illness. We aimed to assess the global prevalence of and risk factors for perinatal mental health disorders or substance use among women who are migrants. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched OVID MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Global Health, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published from database inception until July 8, 2022. Cohort, cross-sectional, and interventional studies with prevalence data for any mental illness in pregnancy or the postnatal period (ie, up to a year after delivery) or substance use in pregnancy were included. The primary outcome was the prevalence of perinatal common mental health disorders among women who are migrants, globally. Data for study quality and risk factors were also extracted. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates, when appropriate. Sensitivity analyses were conducted according to study quality, sample representativeness, and method of outcome assessment. Risk factor data were synthesised narratively. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021226291. 18 650 studies were retrieved, of which 135 studies comprising data from 621 995 participants met the inclusion criteria. 123 (91%) of 135 studies were conducted in high-income host countries. Five (4%) of 135 studies were interventional, 40 (30%) were cohort, and 90 (66%) were cross-sectional. The most common regions of origin of participants were South America, the Middle East, and north Africa. Only 26 studies presented disaggregated data for forced migrants or economic migrants. The pooled prevalence of perinatal depressive disorders was 24·2% (range 0·5-95·5%; I2 98·8%; τ2 0·01) among all women who are migrants, 32·5% (1·5-81·6; 98·7%; 0·01) among forced migrants, and 13·7% (4·7-35·1; 91·5%; 0·01) among economic migrants (p<0·001). The pooled prevalence of perinatal anxiety disorders was 19·6% (range 1·2-53·1; I2 96·8%; τ2 0·01) among all migrants. The pooled prevalence of perinatal post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among all migrant women was 8·9% (range 3·2-33·3; I2 97·4%; τ2 0·18). The pooled prevalence of perinatal PTSD among forced migrants was 17·1% (range 6·5-44·3; I2 96·6%; τ2 0·32). Key risk factors for perinatal depression were being a recently arrived immigrant (ie, approximately within the past year), having poor social support, and having a poor relationship with one's partner. One in four women who are migrants and who are pregnant or post partum experience perinatal depression, one in five perinatal anxiety, and one in 11 perinatal PTSD. The burden of perinatal mental illness appears higher among women who are forced migrants compared with women who are economic migrants. To our knowledge, we have provided the first pooled estimate of perinatal depression and PTSD among women who are forced migrants. Interpreting the prevalence estimate should be observed with caution due to the very wide range found within the included studies. Additionally, 66% of studies were cross-sectional representing low quality evidence. These findings highlight the need for community-based routine perinatal mental health screening for migrant communities, and access to interventions that are culturally sensitive, particularly for forced migrants who might experience a higher burden of disease than economic migrants. UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR); March of Dimes European Preterm Birth Research Centre, Imperial College; Imperial College NIHR Biomedical Research Centre; and Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford.

The experience of pregnancy and having a baby is a time of significant change and transition. One in five perinatal women experience problems with their emotional wellbeing and mental health in this period; adjustment, anxiety and depressive illnesses being most common. Whilst investment in specialist perinatal mental health pathways continues, there is limited understanding of healthcare professionals' views and experiences of these pathways and of support available for women with mild or moderate mental health problems. This study explored healthcare professionals' views on the barriers and facilitators to identification and management of perinatal anxiety, and on how to optimise care pathways. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of healthcare professionals in universal perinatal services (including maternity, primary care, and health-visiting) and specialist (including talking therapies, maternal and perinatal) mental health services. Data were analysed using framework analysis. Interviews were conducted with 62 healthcare professionals from England and Scotland. 40% of the sample stated they had received no training in perinatal mental health, and 45% reported that they did not use standardised or validated questions or scales when enquiring about mental health. Themes related to barriers, facilitators, and service optimisation are presented for each stage of their care pathway: identification; disclosure; referral and assessment; care and treatment. Recommendations for optimising care included improving mental health education and training to strengthen perinatal healthcare and developing a sustainable perinatal mental health pathway, including for women with mild mental health problems. Healthcare professionals considered that the healthcare pathway for women with severe mental health problems was clear and well-developed, but that healthcare for women with mild and moderate anxiety and mental health problems was under-developed. Improvements in perinatal mental health education, in mandatory training for healthcare professionals, should be put in place in order to improve care. Increasing the number of staff and time available to address perinatal mental health is vital but requires additional resources and should be part of long-term strategies for funding.

Addressing the Maternal Mental Health Crisis Through a Novel Tech-Enabled Peer-to-Peer Driven Perinatal Collaborative Care Model

A virtual course in perinatal mental health for healthcare professionals.

Background Pregnant migrants are particularly vulnerable to mental illness because they are exposed to stressors including conflict, poverty, and discrimination. We aimed to assess the global prevalence of perinatal mental health disorders or substance use among migrant women. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, Global Health, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published from inception until July 8, 2022. Cohort, cross-sectional, and interventional studies with prevalence data for any mental illness in the perinatal period or substance use in pregnancy were included. The primary outcome was the prevalence of perinatal mental health disorders amongst migrant women globally. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate pooled prevalence estimates. PROSPERO: CRD42021226291. Results 18,650 studies were retrieved, of which 135 studies (comprising data from 621,995 participants) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled prevalence of perinatal depressive disorders was 24·2% (range 0·5-95·5%; I2 98·8%; τ2 0·01) among all migrant women, 32·5% (1·5-81·6; 98·7%; τ2 0·01) among forced migrants, and 13·7% (4·7-35·1; 91·5%; τ2 0·01) among economic migrants (p &amp;lt; 0·001). The pooled prevalence of perinatal anxiety disorders was 19·6% (range 1·2-53·1; I2 96·8%; τ2 0·01) among all migrants. The pooled prevalence of perinatal post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among all migrant women was 8·9% (range 3·2-33·3; I2 97·4%; τ2 0·18). The pooled prevalence of perinatal PTSD among forced migrants was 17·1% (range 6·5-44·3; I2 96·6%; τ2 0·32). Conclusions One in four migrant women who are pregnant or postpartum experience perinatal depression, one in five perinatal anxiety, and one in 11 perinatal PTSD. The burden of perinatal mental illness appears higher amongst forced migrant women compared to economic migrants. These findings highlight the need for community-based perinatal mental health screening and access to interventions that are culturally sensitive. Key messages • Women who are forced migrants have a higher prevalence of perinatal depressive disorders compared with women who are economic migrants; forced migrants also experience a high burden of PTSD. • The findings highlight the need for culturally sensitive mental health screening and care for migrant women who are pregnant or postpartum, particularly for forced migrants.

This study sought to identify racial and ethnic differences in rates of alcohol-related advice given to veterans treated in Veterans Affairs (VA) facilities. This was a cross-sectional analysis of data from the VA Survey of the Healthcare Experiences of Patients (SHEP). Participants were 255,522 veterans treated in VA ambulatory clinics in fiscal year 2005. SHEP measures included alcohol consumption questions from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test and an item inquiring whether a VA clinician had given advice about drinking. Logistic regression was used to examine relationships between race and ethnicity categories and receipt of alcohol-related advice. Covariate measures included demographic characteristics and physical and mental component summary scores from the Veterans RAND Health Survey (VR-12). Among veterans who consumed any alcohol, compared with veterans from the other racial or ethnic groups, Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Pacific Islander veterans were less likely to be in the medium and highest alcohol consumption categories and non-Hispanic white veterans were less likely to be in the highest alcohol consumption category (p<.001). In a model adjusting for demographic characteristics, physical and mental health status, and alcohol consumption category, among veterans who consumed any alcohol, those who were non-Hispanic black (odds ratio [OR]=1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.47-1.84), Hispanic (OR=1.56, CI=1.35-1.80), or non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (OR=1.56, CI=1.06-2.29) were more likely to report receiving alcohol-related advice, compared with non-Hispanic white veterans. The results suggest that veterans from certain minority groups are more likely than white veterans to report receiving alcohol-related advice in the VA, after the model is adjusted for demographic characteristics, health status, and alcohol consumption. Further research is needed to understand the underlying reasons for observed differences in receipt of alcohol-related advice and the potential clinical implications.

Perinatal mental health disorders affect one in five mothers during pregnancy or within 2 years post childbirth. These disorders can lead to poor pregnancy and childbirth outcomes and maternal deaths. Additionally, they negatively affect a child's cognitive, social and emotional development. Stigma and a lack of specialised services have limited access to mental health care. National Health Service England invested £365M in community perinatal mental health teams, but their impact on women and infants' outcomes are not known. Develop a taxonomy of community perinatal mental health teams (work package 1). Compare and validate two assessments of quality of mother-infant interaction for use by community perinatal mental health teams (work package 2). Evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of community perinatal mental health teams (work packages 3 and 4). Mixed-methods study. Community perinatal mental health teams in England. Women who were pregnant or within 2 years postnatal. Work package 1: Typology of community perinatal mental health teams in England. Work package 2: Reliability and validity of two observational assessments of parent-infant interaction. Work package 3: Realist evaluation interviews with women, partners/close others, and staff to determine effective community perinatal mental health team components. Work package 4: Analysis of linked data: Association of community perinatal mental health teams with access to secondary care mental health services. Risk of acute relapse and improved obstetric and neonate outcomes for women with pre-existing severe disorders in areas with community perinatal mental health teams compared to generic services. Economic analysis of cost of community perinatal mental health teams. Objective 1: Community perinatal mental health team typologies revealed in 2020, 84% had basic staffing levels and 63% had more multi-professionals. Objective 2: The 'Parent Infant Interaction Observation Scale' and 'National Institute of Child Health and Human Development' assessments of mother-infant interaction were reliable and valid; the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development is more suitable for community perinatal mental health teams. Objective 3: Work package 3: Interviews with 139 women, 55 partners/close others and 80 health workers highlighted the importance of specialist perinatal knowledge, responding in a warm and non-judgemental way, working closely with other healthcare providers, optimising medication, supporting mothers to reduce conflict and improve social support, helping mother-infant bonding, and teaching emotional management. Work package 4: Analysis of linked health data revealed higher risks for obstetric and neonate problems in women with severe mental health disorders, particularly recent or very serious episodes. Work package 4: Areas with community perinatal mental health teams saw increased mental health access among perinatal women and reduced need for acute care, albeit at a higher cost and with greater neonatal risks. High levels of missing data on diagnosis and mental health outcomes in existing health and service data. Lack of data on child outcomes. Evaluation occurred during community perinatal mental health team changes and the coronavirus disease discovered in 2019 pandemic limiting a full assessment of the impact of community perinatal mental health teams on maternal and child outcomes. Community perinatal mental health teams can support perinatal women with complex, moderate/severe mental health disorders, but further attention to women's physical needs is essential. The use of observational assessments of parent-infant relationships will enhance the evaluation of community perinatal mental health teams' impact on infant outcomes. Research should focus on prospective studies that gather mental health and child outcomes from community perinatal mental health teams and primary care mental health, to assess broader impacts of perinatal-specific treatment across care pathways. This study is registered on Research Registry as researchregistry5463. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/49/38) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 13, No. 38. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

BackgroundThe perinatal period is a time of increased vulnerability regarding maternal mental health status. Although guidelines and policies have been published for perinatal mental health disorders (PMHDs) screening in China, the knowledge, attitudes, and support needs of nurses and midwives toward implementing mental health screening programs during pregnancy remain unclear. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the knowledge of PMHDs, attitudes and support needs related to implementing mental health screening during pregnancy among obstetrics and gynecology (OB/GYN) nurses and midwives in the central region of China while identifying the related influencing factors.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in 14 cities in Hubei, China, using convenience sampling from July to October 2023. The Chinese version of the Perinatal Mental Health Knowledge Questionnaire, the Chinese version of the Perinatal Mental Health Attitudes Scale, and the Health Care Facilities Support Needs Scale were used to investigate the PMHDs knowledge, attitudes, and support needs of OB/GYN nurses and midwives, respectively. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 27.0. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant.ResultsThe average scores for knowledge, attitudes, and support needs were 6.09 ± 1.99 (total score: 13), 47.67 ± 8.80 (total score: 80), and 29.35 ± 4.66 (total score: 35), respectively. After adjusting for years of nursing experience and years of obstetrics and gynecology nursing experience, the multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that having mental health-related education or work experience [adjusted OR (aOR) = 1.43, p = 0.01], being midwives (aOR = 1.78, p < 0.001), and working in specialist maternity hospitals (aOR = 1.55, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher knowledge scores; having mental health related education or work experience (aOR = 1.59, p = 0.014) and working in specialist maternity hospitals (aOR = 1.42, p < 0.01) were significantly associated with higher support needs scores.ConclusionOB/GYN nurses and midwives demonstrated insufficient knowledge and moderate attitudes toward PMHDs screening, and have great support need for PMHDs screening. To address these issues, medical organizations and relevant government sectors should enhance training for nurses and midwives on PMHDs and provide professional support to promote routine maternal mental health screening programs and improve perinatal mental health outcomes.