Performance of Two-Tiered Subclassification of Atypia of Undetermined Significance in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Without Routine Molecular Testing.

To identify the subtypes of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) that confers a different magnitude for the risk of malignancy (RM), thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cases carrying a diagnosis of "atypical follicular cells" or "follicular lesion" with surgical pathology followup were included in this study. The direct smears of the aspirates were rereviewed and subclassified into four subgroups based on cytomorphology: AUS cannot exclude follicular neoplasm (AUS-FN), AUS cannot exclude Hürthle cell neoplasm (AUS-HCN), AUS cannot exclude papillary carcinoma (AUS-PTC) and AUS, not otherwise specified (AUS-NOS). Based on the followup histopathologic findings, RM not including papillary microcarcinoma (PMC), RM including PMC and the risk of neoplasm (RN) were calculated for each of the four AUS subgroups. A total of 138 AUS cases were subclassified into AUS-NOS (48), AUS-PTC (41), AUS-FN (32), and AUS-HCN (17). RM not including PMC was 32% for AUS-PTC (P < 0.001), 25% for AUS-FN, 8% for AUS-NOS, 0% for AUS-HCN, and 18% for all AUS cases. RM including PMC was 54% for AUS-PTC (P < 0.001), 34% for AUS-FN, 19% for AUS-NOS, 18% for AUS-HCN, and 33% for all AUS cases. RN was 63% for AUS-PTC (P = 0.05), 81% for AUS-FN (P < 0.01), AUS-HCN 53%, AUS-NOS 44% and 59% for all cases. In our study, subclassification enabled us to further divide AUS cases into high- and low-risk groups. The high-risk group includes AUS-PTC with a significantly higher risk of malignancy and AUS-FN with a significantly higher risks of neoplasm. AUS-HCN and AUS-NOS subgroups demonstrate a lower risk of malignancy of <10%.

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) has provided a set of uniform diagnostic terminology including benign (B), atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), follicular neoplasm (FN), suspicious for malignancy (SM), malignancy (M), and nondiagnostic (ND) for the interpretation of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA). We applied this terminology on our 1,382 thyroid aspirates in a community practice setting, which included 539 cases of B (39%), 376 cases of AUS (27.2%), 116 cases of FN (8.4%), 37 cases of malignant (2.7%), 36 cases of SM (2.6%), and 278 cases of ND (20.1%). Two hundred twenty-one cases (16%) of thyroid FNA had corresponding follow-up thyroidectomies. Each diagnostic category represented a unique association with risk of malignancy and risk of neoplasm. Based on histologic follow-up, the risk of neoplasm (including benign and malignant neoplasm) was B 14%, AUS 44%, FN 67%, SM 77%, and M 100% and the risk of malignancy was B 3%, AUS 6%, FN 22%, SM 56%, and M 100%. The classification and follow-up recommendation of TBSRTC are appropriate for each category. Both B and AUS are low-risk lesions with low probability of malignancy. FN predicts a higher rate for neoplasm but an intermediate rate for malignancy while SM carries a high risk for malignancy.

Significant interobserver variabilities exist for Bethesda category III: atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC). Thus, subcategorization of AUS including AUS “nuclear” and AUS “other” is proposed in the recent 3rd edition of TBSRTC. This study investigated the impact of the nuclear features/architectural features/nuclear score (NS) (3-tiered)/subcategories and subgroups on risk of malignancy (ROM) in thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNA). 6940 FNAs were evaluated. 1224 (17.6%) cases diagnosed as AUS were reviewed, and 240 patients (initial FNAs of 260 nodules and 240 thyroidectomies) were included. Subcategories and subgroups were defined according to TBSRTC 2nd and 3rd editions. Histological diagnostic groups included nonneoplastic disease, benign neoplasm, low-risk neoplasm, and malignant neoplasm. Overall, ROM was 30.7%. ROM was significantly higher in FNAs with nuclear overlapping (35.5%), nuclear molding (56.9%), irregular contours (42.1%), nuclear grooves (74.1%), chromatin clearing (49.4%), and chromatin margination (57.7%), and these features were independent significant predictors for malignancy. FNAs with NS3 had significantly higher ROM (64.2%). Three-dimensional groups were significantly more frequent in malignant neoplasms (35.7%). ROM was significantly higher in AUS-nuclear subcategory (48.2%) and in AUS-nuclear and architectural subcategory (38.3%). The highest ROM was detected in AUS-nuclear1 subgroup (65.2%). ROM was significantly higher in the group including AUS-nuclear and AUS-nuclear and architectural subcategories, namely “high-risk group” than the group including other subcategories, namely “low-risk group” (42.0%vs 13.9%). In conclusion, subcategorization may not be the end point, and nuclear scoring and evaluation of architectural patterns according to strict criteria may provide data for remodeling of TBSRTC categories.

Objective: To determine if focal ‘nuclear atypia’ or ‘microfollicular architecture’ portends a higher risk of malignancy than other subcategories of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) in thyroid fine-needle aspirations (FNAs). Study Design: The frequencies of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) categories were calculated from 3,956 thyroid FNAs interpreted over a 26-month period at The Johns Hopkins Hospital after adoption of TBSRTC. TBSRTC criteria were applied strictly. The risk of malignancy, specifically for AUS subcategories, was analyzed by cyto-histo correlation. Results: Of the 133 cases diagnosed as AUS, 32% were found to have stageable carcinoma (not incidental microcarcinoma) on resection. When the subset of AUS with ‘nuclear atypia’ (AUS-N) was separated from other AUS cases, 48% (30/62) of them had stageable carcinoma on resection; of the AUS subset with ‘microfollicular architecture’ (AUS-F), 27% (8/30) were malignant on resection. The ‘suspicious for papillary thyroid carcinoma’ (SPTC) group maintained a higher risk of malignancy versus AUS-N (relative risk, RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.23–1.81). Conclusion: The subcategory of ‘nuclear atypia’ within AUS indicates a higher risk of malignancy than other subcategories of AUS but has a lower risk of malignancy than SPTC does. Thus, it is an important distinction with potential clinical implications.

Atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) is a category of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology that refers to salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens that cannot be definitively diagnosed as neoplastic or nonneoplastic. The AUS FNA samples were selected from a large academic institution from 2008 through 2018. The AUS cases were divided into 6 subgroups. The risk of malignancy (ROM), risk of neoplasm (RON), and clinical outcomes for each subgroup were evaluated. A total of 123 cases were found (76 males and 47 females with a mean age of 62years [range, 6-94years]). The parotid gland was the most common FNA site (103 cases), followed by the submandibular gland (9 cases). The overall RON and ROM were 63% and 47%, respectively. Among the subgroups, salivary gland lymph nodes or lymphoid lesions was the most common diagnosis (42%), whereas mucinous cystic lesions with no or a scant epithelial component was the least common (2%). The specimens with preparation artifacts category had the highest RON and ROM (100% for both), whereas the reactive and reparative atypia indefinite for a neoplasm category had the lowest RON and ROM (7% for both). The salivary gland lymph nodes or lymphoid lesions indefinite for a lymphoproliferative disorder category had the second highest RON and ROM at 77% and 74%, respectively. The overall RON and ROM for the AUS category were 63% and 47%, respectively. The RON and ROM varied among the different AUS subgroups, being highest in the specimens with preparation artifacts category and lowest in the reactive and reparative atypia category, thereby demonstrating the importance of subgrouping in the AUS specimens.

Impact of thyroid Bethesda category IV (follicular neoplasm) terminology unification on atypia of undetermined significance reporting patterns in thyroid fine-needle aspiration.

The optimal management of thyroid nodules that undergo fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with findings of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) is unclear. Categorizing nodules by AUS subtype and ultrasound characteristics may improve risk stratification. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the association between AUS subtype and ultrasound features on risk of malignancy (ROM). We performed a review of all patients with a thyroid nodule who underwent an FNA at our institution between January 2010 and November 2015. Patients with AUS were divided into groups with (1) nuclear atypia, (2) architectural atypia, or (3) Hurthle cell atypia. Their ultrasound features were assessed using the American Thyroid Association (ATA) thyroid nodule sonographic patterns. We conducted a univariate and multivariable analysis to determine the association between AUS subtype and other variables of interest with ROM. Of the 3428 thyroid nodules that underwent FNA, 237 (6.9%) had AUS. Of the 97 surgically resected nodules, 67 (69%) were benign and 30 (31%) were malignant. On univariate analysis nuclear atypia (p < 0.01) was associated with a thyroid malignancy. On multivariable analysis, both ATA high-risk ultrasound features (p = 0.04, odds ratio [OR] 3.68) and nuclear atypia (p < 0.01, OR 11.8) were independently associated with a final diagnosis of thyroid carcinoma. Nuclear atypia and ATA high-risk ultrasound features are useful in identifying patients with AUS that are at a higher risk of thyroid malignancy. Surgeons should take these factors into consideration when evaluating patients with AUS.

Molecular testing is recommended for risk stratification of atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) nodules in the USA; however, it is not routinely performed in some countries owing to limited availability and affordability. Here, we propose a risk stratification algorithm for AUS nodules when molecular testing is unavailable. We examined 304 (4.3%) AUS nodules among 7073 thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens examined at Kuma Hospital from January 2020 to December 2020. Clinical data were obtained from the medical records of Kuma Hospital. AUS with nuclear atypia and AUS-other each accounted for half of the total AUS nodules. The repeat aspiration rate was 19.7%; 61.7% of the nodules were reclassified as benign or malignant upon repeat aspiration. Resection rate and overall risk of malignancy (ROM) were 32.6% and 12.8%, respectively. Architectural atypia showed the lowest (1.1%) overall ROM in the AUS nodules. For AUS with nuclear atypia, nodules ≤ 10 mm in size showed significantly lower overall ROM than those of > 10 mm, and nodules with ultrasonographically low suspicion showed significantly lower overall ROM than those with intermediate to high suspicion. AUS nodules with atypical lymphoid cells, possible medullary thyroid carcinoma, or possible parathyroid lesion were confirmed using flow cytometry, biochemical testing using needle washout fluid or immunocytochemistry, respectively. Our proposed clinical management algorithm for each subdivision according to cytological findings, based on repeat aspiration rates, ROM, ultrasound findings and results of ancillary tests except for molecular testing, should be useful for the clinical management of AUS nodules.

"Atypia of undetermined significance" (AUS) in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology is a heterogeneous category for cases that cannot be easily classified into benign, suspicious, or malignant. This study evaluated whether cytomorphology-based subcategorization could better predict the malignancy risk in cases designated as AUS, and how the subcategories correlated with BRAF mutation status in thyroid fine-needle aspirates (FNA). Of 3589 cases of thyroid FNA diagnosed at the authors' institution in Seongnam, Korea, from January 2010 to December 2011, 331 cases of AUS were reviewed and subcategorized based on cytomorphological features, including nuclear atypia (NA), microfollicle formation (MF), Hürthle cell change (HC), and others (O). The malignancy rate of each subcategory was calculated using cases with histologic follow-up. Pyrosequencing was conducted to detect BRAF mutations. Malignancy was histologically proven in 23.3% (77 of 331) of cases diagnosed as AUS. In cytomorphology-based subcategories, the rate of malignancy was 30.8% (66 of 214) for AUS-NA, 14.5% (8 of 55) for AUS-O, 4.8% (2 of 42) for AUS-MF, and 5% (1 of 20) for AUS-HC. The BRAF V600E mutation was found in 40% (48 of 120) of AUS-NA, 30.8% (4 of 13) of AUS-HC, 6.7% (1 of 15) of AUS-O, and 2.8% (1 of 35) of AUS-MF. The AUS-NA subcategory was associated with the highest risk of malignancy and the greatest frequency of BRAF V600E (substitution of valine to glutamic acid at position 600) mutation. These findings suggest that subcategorization of AUS by cytomorphology and BRAF V600E mutation status is important for predicting the risk of malignancy.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine the risk of neoplasm and malignancy in thyroid fine needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance with Hürthle cell change (AUS-H) or Hürthle cell neoplasm (HCN). Study Design: A computerized search of our laboratory information system was performed to identify all thyroid FNA and correlating surgical pathology diagnoses including Hürthle cell or oncocyte in the diagnostic nomenclature. The risks of neoplasm and malignancy were calculated for AUS-H and HCN categories separately. Results: For the 29 AUS-H cases, the follow-up histology demonstrated 15 benign lesions, 4 follicular adenomas, 7 Hürthle cell adenomas, 1 papillary microcarcinoma (PMC), 1 follicular carcinoma and 1 Hürthle cell carcinoma. For the 93 HCN cases, the follow-up histology demonstrated 28 benign lesions, 9 follicular adenomas, 32 Hürthle cell adenomas, 2 PMCs, 2 papillary thyroid carcinomas, 6 follicular carcinomas and 14 Hürthle cell carcinomas. Conclusions: The risks of neoplasm and malignancy were 62 and 7% for the AUS-H category and 73 and 24% for the HCN category, respectively. The risk of malignancy for the AUS-H patients is within the 5- to 15-percent range suggested by the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology and within the 15- to 30-percent range suggested for follicular neoplasms.

ThyroSeq assesses the probability of malignancy (POM) in thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology specimens diagnosed as atypia of undetermined significance (AUS). The authors investigated whether defined AUS subcategories are associated with specific molecular alterations, the molecular-derived risk of malignancy (MDROM), and the risk of malignancy (ROM). Fine-needle aspiration cytology reports of AUS and corresponding results from the ThyroSeq version 3 genomic classifier results were retrieved and subcategorized as follicular cells with either cytologic atypia (FC-C), architectural atypia (FC-A), both cytologic and architectural atypia (FC-CA), or a predominance of Hurthle cells (PHC). The MDROM, ROM, and frequency of molecular alterations by subcategory were computed and analyzed, and p &lt; .05 was considered significant. The final analysis included 541 cases subdivided into 233 with FC-A, 104 with FC-C, 116 with FC-CA, and 88 with PHC. The benign call rate and positive call rate for the AUS category were 72% and 28%, respectively, which varied between AUS subcategories. The MDROM by subcategory was 15.9% FC-A, 20.5% FC-C, 33.8% FC-CA, and 14.4% PHC. Histologic follow-up was available for 155 (28%) AUS cases with a follow-up period ≥12 months. The 95% confidence intervals of the MDROMs overlapped with the ROMs. The highest MDROM and ROM were in the FC-CA subcategory. RAS mutations were present in all subcategories. BRAF V600E mutations and papillary thyroid carcinoma were most frequent in the FC-CA subcategory. Noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features was significantly more frequent in the FC-C subcategory. The current results demonstrated that AUS subcategories are associated with specific genetic alterations, the MDROM, and the ROM. Molecular results and an awareness of various cancer probabilities within AUS subcategories can allow for a more tailored management.

Objective: The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a recently published evidence-based categorization system for salivary gland fine-needle aspiration (FNA). We applied MSRSGC to Japanese cases and evaluated its utility. Study Design: A total of 480 FNA cases were reviewed. We recategorized each case into one of the MSRSGC categories. The risk of neoplasm (RON) and the risk of malignancy (ROM) for each diagnostic category in MSRSGC, and the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for malignancy and for neoplasms were calculated for cases with histological follow-up. In addition, the overall ROM (O-ROM) was calculated for all FNA cases. Results: RON, ROM, and O-ROM rates were as follows – non-diagnostic: 51.3, 5.1, and 1.0%; non-neoplastic: 0, 0, and 0%; atypia of undetermined significance: 83.9, 12.9, and 7.3%; neoplasm, benign: 100, 0, and 0%; salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential: 100, 32.1, and 23.7%; suspicious for malignancy: 100, 85.7, and 60%; and malignant: 100, 100, 81.8%. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy with (without) indeterminate cases for malignancy were 65 (100), 99 (99), 92% (99%) and PPV and NPV were 96 and 100%, respectively, and those for neoplasms were 84 (100), 100 (100), 85% (100%), and PPV and NPV were 100 and 100%, respectively. Conclusions: The MSRSGC is useful for stratification of ROM and for promoting the performance of salivary gland FNA. The MSRSGC could be easily introduced in Japan and may improve the Japanese salivary gland FNA status.

The atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) category is heterogeneous, leading to variations in its use. To prevent excessive usage, the AUS rate should be≤10%. Although this recommendation aims to maintain diagnostic quality, it lacks supporting data. The AUS:Malignant (AUS:M) ratio has been proposed as a metric tool to evaluate AUS use. Furthermore, integrating ThyroSeq v3 (TSV3) positive call rate (PCR) and the molecular-derived risk of malignancy (MDROM) have been put forward as performance improvement tools. The authors reviewed their AUS:M ratios, TSV3 PCR, MDROM, and ROM. Thyroid aspirates evaluated in the laboratory (from August 2022 to September 2023) by seven cytopathologists (CPs) were identified. AUS:M ratio, MDROM, ROM, and TSV3 PCR results for the laboratory and each CP were recorded and analyzed. A total of 2248 aspirates were identified (462 AUS and 80 malignant). The AUS:M ratio for the laboratory was 5.8 (CPs range, 2.8 to 7.3). The TSV3 PCR for the laboratory was 23% (CPs range, 11% to 41%). The MDROM for the laboratory was 19% (CPs range, 9% to 31%), whereas the ROM was 36% (CPs range, 29% to 50%). Linear regression analysis of AUS:M ratio versus TSV3 PCR and MDROM demonstrated a moderate positive correlation but a weak negative correlation to the ROM. Deviations from established targets were attributed to multiple factors. The findings of this study underscore the importance of using a combination of metrics to evaluate diagnostic practices. By dissecting the practice patterns of each CP, the authors can measure different aspects of their performance and provide individualized feedback.

The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytology (BSFRTC) is widely adopted in the management of thyroid nodules. The system was updated in 2017, and its impact is the subject of this paper. All thyroid fine needle aspirations from 2016-2020 using the BSFRTC, with follow-up surgical pathology, were reviewed. The risk of neoplasia (RON), risk of malignancy (ROM), RON/ROM ratio, and surgical follow-up rate were determined for each diagnostic category with cytohistological correlation. ROM was calculated in two separate manners, with non-invasive follicular tumours with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) counted as malignant or non-malignant. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values were determined for indeterminate categories: atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), suspicious for follicular neoplasm (SFN), and suspicious for malignancy (SFM). RON, ROM, and the surgical follow-up rate increased steadily from the benign through intermediate to malignant categories. The omission of NIFTP from malignant lesions reduced the calculated ROM in indeterminate categories and improved the stratification between AUS and SFN. ROM in AUS was distinct from SFN. AUS has a well-balanced sensitivity and specificity favouring a screening rather than a diagnostic category. The calculated RON/ROM was significantly higher in AUS (1.56), compared to SFN (1.03) and SM (1.05), in agreement with current BSRTC management recommendations. AUS is an important screening category and should remain with the addition of subcategorisation. RON and surgical follow-up rates are essential quality indicators. The RON/ROM ratio could be utilised to determine appropriate management for each diagnostic category on an institutional basis.

Objective:The Japanese System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (JSRTC) does not include the risks of malignancies (ROMs) or recommended clinical management. This multi-institutional study aimed to determine the frequency, re-aspiration rate, resection rate, ROM, and clinical management options in seven different categories.Material and Methods:For 15,495 cases of thyroid fine-needle aspiration performed at seven Japanese institutions without molecular testing, the frequency, re-aspiration rate, resection rate, ROM, and clinical management options of each diagnostic category were examined. The categorization was based on JSRTC, and cases were subdivided into those with nuclear atypia and other subtypes for undetermined significance.Results:Re-aspiration of unsatisfactory and undermined significance diagnostic categories was mainly performed for cases of suspected malignancy on ultrasound. The median re-aspiration rate of cyst fluid nodules was 4.9%, which was significantly different from that (17.8%) of unsatisfactory cases (P < 0.05). The resected ROMs for nodules that were suspicious for malignancy and malignant were 94.2% and 99.6%, respectively. The low resection rates of nodules that were suspicious for malignancy (77.8%) and malignant (70.8%) could be attributed to active surveillance for low-risk papillary microcarcinoma. The overall ROMs of unsatisfactory, cyst fluid, benign, undetermined significance, and follicular neoplasms were 4.5%, 0.4%, 0.7%, 16.7%, and 11.4%, respectively. In the subtype of undetermined significance, the overall ROM of nuclear atypia (27.6%) was higher than that of the others (6.7%).Conclusion:Overall, this study determines the frequency, ROM, and recommended clinical management for thyroid cytopathology in Japan. These results were different from those proposed by the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. In the future, our results will be helpful in the revision of JSRTC and will contribute to improving the outcomes among Japanese patients with thyroid nodules.