Abstract

The performance of two minimal QR-LSL algorithms in a low precision environment is investigated. For both algorithms backward consistency and backward stability become guaranteed under simple numerical conventions. They present stable behaviour even when excited with ill conditioned signals such as predictable signals. Since the problem of ensuring numerical stability is solved for these algorithms, an investigation about their accuracy is in place. By simulating a channel equalizer configuration it is shown that, for small mantissa wordlengths and forgetting factors /spl lambda/ not too close to 1, the a priori algorithm performs better due to its dispensing with passive rotations. For forgetting factors very close to one and small wordlengths, both algorithms are sensitive to the accuracy of some well-identified computations. They are compared to an LSL algorithm, based on a priori prediction errors, whose good performance in limited precision environments is known.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.