Abstract
Background/Objective: To ensure about which protocol is best for mobile networks by comparing the performances of DSR, DSDV and AODV protocols using NS-2. Method/Statistical Analysis: The functionalities of the three protocols have been compared by the three performance metrics such as Packet Delivery Ratio, Control Overhead and End to End Delay for the changing scenario. Findings: By comparing the packet delivery, it is clear that DSDV protocol is not good but, by comparing the control overhead, DSDV has very high control overhead than DSR and AODV protocols. AODV protocol performs well in some cases but considering the overall performances, DSR performs good than AODV protocol. Improvements/Applications: The protocols design will be improved to adapt themselves for all the changing scenario of the networks and this will be helpful in many applications such as military applications, emergency rescue operations, exploration missions etc. Keywords: AODV, Control Overhead, DSDV, DSR, End to End Delay, Mobility, Packet Delivery Ratio, Packet Size, Time Interval
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
