Abstract

The concept of an evacuated flat plate (EFP) collector was proposed over 40 years ago but, despite its professed advantages, very few manufacturers have developed commercial versions. This situation suggests both technical difficulties in manufacturing a competitively-priced sealed for life panel and a lack of awareness of the benefits of such panels.This paper demonstrates an evacuated flat plate simulation that closely models experimental efficiency measurements. Having established the validity of the model, it compares published data for a commercial EFP collector with predictions for an optimal design to investigate whether any further efficiency improvement might be possible. The optimised design is then evaluated against alternative solar energy devices by modelling a number of possible applications. These comparisons should inform choices about solar options for delivering heat: EFP collectors are well-suited to some of these applications.Evacuated flat plate collectors are a possible alternative to concentrating collectors for Organic Rankine Cycle power generation. The annual output for all the modelled collectors was found to be a quadratic function of delivery temperature: this enabled a novel optimisation of ORC source temperature. Predictions for concentrating and non-concentrating ORC plant are compared with a PV/thermal alternative. The ORC output is significantly less than a PV panel would achieve; applications needing both heat and power are better served by PVT panels. This is an original and novel result.

Highlights

  • The concept of an evacuated flat plate (EFP) collector was proposed over 40 years ago but, despite its professed advantages, very few manufacturers have developed commercial versions

  • This paper demonstrates an evacuated flat plate simulation that closely models experimental efficiency measurements

  • At G = 1000 W/m2 the optimised evacuated panel has higher efficiency than other designs up to TM = 245 °C: beyond this point the parabolic trough collector is more efficient, albeit only in clear conditions when beam radiation is available. At this high radiation level and TM = 60 °C an optimised evacuated flat plate could collect 13% more heat than a conventional flat panel or 32% more than the same area of evacuated tubes; this increases to approximately 50% relative to either flat panel or evacuated tube at TM = 100 °C.The PVT panel in Fig. 7 is a simulation described as “state of the art” by Matuska et al [45] that predicted the performance that should be possible from a single-glazed flat panel collector with PV cells bonded to the absorber surface

Read more

Summary

Evacuated flat plate solar thermal collectors

Non-concentrating solar thermal collectors for low temperature applications such as domestic solar hot water (DSHW) conventionally adopt either a flat plate (FP) or evacuated tube (ET) format. CHP DSHW EFP ET FP ORC PTC PV PVD PVT RTD TVP combined heat and power domestic solar hot water evacuated flat plate collector evacuated tube collector flat plate collector (non-evacuated) Organic Rankine cycle parabolic trough collector photo-voltaic panel physical vapour deposition photo-voltaic/thermal panel resistance temperature detector evacuated flat plate collector by TVP Solar combine the high fill factor, ease of cleaning and visual aesthetics of FP collectors with the low heat loss coefficient of ET collectors. They consist of a flat absorber contained within an evacuated enclosure with a top glass cover. Of an improved design, have demonstrated the advantages for DSHW heating under typical UK irradiance conditions and assessed the potential use of an organic Rankine cycle for power generation

Recent developments in thermal collectors
Enclosure styles
Absorber manufacture
System components and test procedure
Vacuum sealing
Test stability and instrumentation accuracy
Test results
Simulations of performance based on weather data
Panel area required to meet a low-temperature heat demand in Winter
Identification of optimum peak temperature T1 for an Organic Rankine cycle
Efficiency requirements for thermal power cycles to compete with PV panels
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.