Abstract
Background: Aspiration pneumonia is the most common cause of death in patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding. This study aimed to compare PEG versus NGT feeding regarding the risk of pneumonia, according to the severity of pooling secretions in the pharyngolaryngeal region. Methods: Patients were stratified by endoscopic observation of the pooling secretions in the pharyngolaryngeal region: control group (<25% pooling secretions filling the pyriform sinus), pharyngeal group (25–100% pooling secretions filling the pyriform sinus), and laryngeal group (pooling secretions entering the laryngeal vestibule). Demographic data, swallowing level scale score, and pneumonia requiring hospital admission were recorded. Results: Patients with NGT (n = 97) had a significantly higher incidence of pneumonia (episodes/person-years) than those patients with PEG (n = 130) in the pharyngeal group (3.6 ± 1.0 vs. 2.3 ± 2.1, P < 0.001) and the laryngeal group (3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 2.3 ± 2.2 vs, P < 0.001). The risk of pneumonia was significantly higher in patients with NGT than in patients with PEG (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.85, 95% CI: 1.46–4.98, P < 0.001). Cumulative proportion of pneumonia was significantly higher in patients with NGT than with PEG for patients when combining the two groups (pharyngeal + laryngeal groups) (P = 0.035). Conclusion: PEG is a better choice than NGT feeding due to the decrease in risk of pneumonia requiring hospital admission, particularly in patients with abnormal amounts of pooling secretions accumulation in the pyriform sinus or leak into the laryngeal vestibule.
Highlights
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding are widely used for delivering enteral nutrition to patients with dysphagia [1,2]
Meta-analyses of pneumonia risk did not observe that patients with NGT were at higher risk than those with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), but these results may be due to high levels of statistical heterogeneity between studies [2,11,12]
There were no significant differences between the baseline characteristics of the PEG and NGT groups, regarding age, gender, body mass index, serum albumin level, duration of tube feeding, swallowing level scale score, reasons for tube feeding, severity of pooling secretions, occurrence of pneumonia, and incidence of pneumonia requiring hospital admission
Summary
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding are widely used for delivering enteral nutrition to patients with dysphagia [1,2]. Aspiration pneumonia is the most common cause of death in patients with PEG and NGT feeding [9,10]. Meta-analyses of pneumonia risk did not observe that patients with NGT were at higher risk than those with PEG, but these results may be due to high levels of statistical heterogeneity between studies [2,11,12]. Aspiration pneumonia is the most common cause of death in patients with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding. Cumulative proportion of pneumonia was significantly higher in patients with NGT than with PEG for patients when combining the two groups
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
