Abstract

Cet article examine la relation entre les styles de leadership, l’implication et la perception des cultures et subcultures organisationnelles. L’impact de la culture et du style de leadership sur l’implication a déjàété envisagé, mais on manque d’informations sur les relations que les différents types de culture et de styles de leadership entretiennent avec l’implication. L’article est centré sur la notion de subculture organisationnelle et la façon dont la perception de ces cultures rejaillit sur l’implication, la subculture étant une variable négligée dans la littérature sur l’implication. Cette question fut abordée dans une enquête portant sur 258 infirmières relevant de divers secteurs hospitaliers de l’agglomération de Sydney. Les résultats indiquent que la subculture organisationnelle perçue est forcement reliée à l’implication. On précise en outre la force du lien existant entre l’implication et les différents types de leadership et de subculture. Les subcultures innovantes et centrées sur les personnes bénéficient d’une relation nettement positive tandis que les subcultures bureaucratiques souffrent d’une relation négative. Pour ce qui est des styles de leadership, un style centré sur les relations présente un lien plus fort avec l’implication qu’un style centré sur la tâche. Une analyse de régression a permis d’étudier l’éventuel rôle médiateur de la subculture dans l’influence du leadership sur l’implication. Le leadership a des effets à la fois directs et indirects sur l’implication. On traite finalement des retombées sur la pratique et les recherches à venir.This paper investigates the relationship between perceptions of organisational culture, organisational subculture, leadership style, and commitment. The impact of culture and leadership style on commitment has been previously noted, but there is a lack of detail regarding how different types of culture and leadership styles relate to commitment. The paper particularly addresses the notion of organisational subcultures and how the perception of those cultures relates to commitment, subculture being a neglected variable in the commitment literature. These issues were addressed in a survey of 258 nurses drawn from a range of hospital settings and wards within the Sydney metropolitan region. Results indicate that perceived organisational subculture has a strong relationship with commitment. Furthermore, the results identify the relative strength of specific types of leadership style and specific types of subculture with commitment. Both innovative and supportive subcultures have a clear positive relationship, while bureaucratic subcultures have a negative relationship. In terms of leadership style, a consideration style had a stronger relationship with commitment than a structuring style. Regression analysis was used to investigate the possible role of subculture as a mediator for the influence of leadership on commitment. Both direct and indirect effects of leadership on commitment were found. Implications for practice and for further research are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.