Abstract

Office-based clinicians play a major role in cervical cancer screening in the United States, but little is known about their specific knowledge and understanding of the technical aspects of obtaining an adequate Pap smear. We surveyed 186 office-based clinicians using a major commercial laboratory for cytology services to obtain their opinions regarding the technical adequacy of Pap smears, collection procedures, and methods of communicating test results to patients. There was an 80.1% response rate. Two thirds of the respondents were men. Cytobrush use was reported significantly more by female clinicians. Respondents varied in reported rotation of the cytobrush, from 90 degrees to greater than 360 degrees. More female than male clinicians appropriately indicated that inflammation and heavy vaginal discharge caused sampling difficulties. Approximately half of the respondents believed that errors in cervical screening most often resulted from sampling the cervix or preparation of the Pap smear. Nineteen percent reported that ectocervical cells were not necessary for an adequate smear to be reported. Just over 25% of respondents indicated they did not report normal Pap smear results to the patient. The results indicate differences between clinicians by gender and specialty in reported knowledge, understanding, and technique in cervical cancer screening. The differences suggest that targeted education in this population may be important to improve the quality of cervical cancer screening. Medical Subject Headings (MeSH): screening; neoplasms, cervical; Papanicolaou smear; diagnosis, laboratory.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.