Abstract
The purpose of this research is to determine how the PTUN tests the discretion of government officials by means of normative legal research methods. So, that it could be concluded that’s discretion had Law no. 30 of 2014 regarding Government Management. Meanwhile, for discration decisions that are deemed to be violations or discrepancies announced by government bodies or officials, administrative settlement processes, administrative appeals and lawsuits can be carried out in court. Where, the use of discretion may be exercised by government officials while still exercising it for several government officials, then the testing of discretion by the PTUN against government officials is based on various specific reasons, and the discretion exercised by government officials must be accountable.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
