Abstract

The goal of this study is to see how intellectual intelligence affects academic cheating and how academic self-efficacy varies, with students' ethical beliefs as the limiting variable.The methodologies used in this investigation are quantitative.The survey's target audience was UPN Veteran Jawa Timur Experienced Accounting Students 2018, and the sample size was 70 people. The data analysis method is Warp PLS 7.0 Partial Least Square (PLS) software, and the sampling method is simple random sampling. The study and evaluation test results demonstrate a varying influence of intellectual intelligence on academic falsification, with a path coefficient of -0.455 and a p-value of 0.001. A path factor of -0.377 and a P-value of 0.001 were also found in variable testing of academic self-efficacy for academic fraud. The results show patf coefficients of 0.205 and P-values of 0.036 when testing the moderation variable, student ethical attitudes moderating intellectual intelligence, and academic self-report factors for academic cheating. With a P-value of 0.001, we may conclude that intellectual intelligence and academic self-efficacy factors have a negative and substantial impact on academic fraud, and that a variable in a student's ethical approach can diminish both of these variables. 
 Keywords: intellectual intelligence, academic self-efficacy, academic fraud, student's ethical attitude

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.