Pediatric Vascular Access Peripheral IV Algorithm Success Rate

Abstract

PurposeDetermine if the pediatric peripheral vascular access algorithm (PPVAA) led to differences in first-attempt and overall peripheral intravenous (PIV) success, staff attempting PIV access per episode and overall attempts and first PIV attempt success by provider. Design/MethodsA two-cohort pre-/post-implementation comparative design involved pediatric nurses and patients. The PPVAA included four components: a patient comfort plan, PIV grading score, nurses' self-assessed IV access capability and nurse decision to stop-the-line. Two sample t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test and Pearson's chi-square test were used to evaluate differences between groups and measures. ResultsHealthcare providers (N=96) attempted 721 PIV insertions (pre-PPVAA, n=419 and post-PPVAA, n=302). Of 78 nurse providers, mean (SD) age was 37.4 (11.0) years and 20.0% self-assessed PIV capability as expert. Of children, mean age was 8.3 (7.0) years. Post-PPVAA, first-attempt (p=0.86) and overall (p=0.21) success did not change, though fewer staff were needed per episode to initiate PIV; p=0.017. Overall rate of success after one attempt in the post-PPVAA period compared to pre-PPVAA was reduced (p=0.002), reflecting greater awareness to stop-the-line. Compared to pre-PPVAA, advanced practice nurses and non-clinician providers were more likely to achieve success on first attempt. ConclusionsThe PPVAA did not increase first-attempt or overall PIV success; however, it decreased overall IV attempts and the number of staff attempting access per episode. Practice ImplicationsThe multi-component PPVAA provided a guide for nurses during PIV and assisted decision making to stop attempts in difficult cases.